|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
March 18th, 2009, 07:04 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 219
Thanks: 50
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Tank, model year 1972
If thats what it should look like then I'm fine with it. I just thought I would point out something that looked wierd to me so if it was a problem Don & Andy could fix it.
I recognize that they have worked hard on this game and that without them we would be playing a very outdated piece of software, thanks Don and Andy.
Last edited by Ramm; March 18th, 2009 at 07:14 PM..
Reason: LOL
|
March 18th, 2009, 07:06 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 219
Thanks: 50
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Tank, model year 1972
message deleted
|
March 18th, 2009, 07:32 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,490
Thanks: 3,960
Thanked 5,696 Times in 2,813 Posts
|
|
Re: Tank, model year 1972
Andrew........ a case could be made that the turret in question is a pixel ( ONE PIXEL ) longer ( as a "slice" of turret ) than it should be or could be at this scale but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. If you think it looks like a "green Easter egg" I might suggest corrective eyewear
But I will say that anyone who feels it's their "duty" to complain about things that they really have no actual idea what it's supposed to look like
Quote:
"Is that the way its supposed to look?"
|
is really just being a PITA whether that's you intent or not is irrelevant.
Don
|
March 18th, 2009, 07:49 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 219
Thanks: 50
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Tank, model year 1972
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG
Andrew........ a case could be made that the turret in question is a pixel ( ONE PIXEL ) longer ( as a "slice" of turret ) than it should be or could be at this scale but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. If you think it looks like a "green Easter egg" I might suggest corrective eyewear
But I will say that anyone who feels it's their "duty" to complain about things that they really have no actual idea what it's supposed to look like
Quote:
"Is that the way its supposed to look?"
|
is really just being a PITA whether that's you intent or not is irrelevant.
Don
|
The reason I asked if thats what it looked like was because the T-72 I saw at Aberdeen may have been different then the one modeled. So I do know what I am talking about or at least as much as an honest amateur who tells it like he sees it. I'm sorry you think I'm being a pain but I will continue to report anything that looks odd to me
and if you want you can ignore me. Just don't get offended I'm not personally attacking you just trying help out.
Last edited by Ramm; March 18th, 2009 at 08:02 PM..
Reason: Grammer
|
March 18th, 2009, 08:26 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 219
Thanks: 50
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Tank, model year 1972
I'm sorry for being disrespectful Don.
Sincerely,
Andrew Nault
|
March 18th, 2009, 10:03 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: Tank, model year 1972
Skirmisher unless I am mistaken thats Mr Woodward there, do you just use your forces to mop up after he has scarred the .... out of them?
|
March 18th, 2009, 10:13 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 919
Thanks: 26
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Tank, model year 1972
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imp
Skirmisher unless I am mistaken thats Mr Woodward there, do you just use your forces to mop up after he has scarred the .... out of them?
|
Yup
|
March 18th, 2009, 10:18 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 919
Thanks: 26
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Tank, model year 1972
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imp
Skirmisher unless I am mistaken thats Mr Woodward there, do you just use your forces to mop up after he has scarred the .... out of them?
|
What ya think submachine shot or mugshot better?
|
March 18th, 2009, 10:41 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: Tank, model year 1972
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skirmisher
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imp
Skirmisher unless I am mistaken thats Mr Woodward there, do you just use your forces to mop up after he has scarred the .... out of them?
|
What ya think submachine shot or mugshot better?
|
Stick with the mugshot its more intimidating
|
March 19th, 2009, 02:17 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 733
Thanks: 74
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
|
|
Re: Tank, model year 1972
While I can see, now you've mentioned it, an Easter Eggyness to it, it does look right. As for T72's they have many variants and there are within the game a few icons which pretty much cover them off for the scale here. I'm positive the T72 you saw looked different than the one here especially from a ground prespective.
Bottom-line don't worry even after playing this game for 15 plus years I'm still seeing things that I'm assured are not there!!
Bob out
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PanzerBob For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|