|
|
|
|
|
September 12th, 2002, 08:47 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 558
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cool tactic: Retrofitting on the Fly
Sorry for the newbie question but if you build more than 1 spaceyard on a planet, and you build something there, do they both "work" on the construction or do they have seperate construction queues?
Am i correct i assuming that for instance 2 construction ships only work on items in their own construction queue and thus don't stack?
__________________
A Se++ GdY $++ Fr+ C++++ Csc Sf++ Ai** AuO M MpT MpSk MpFd S--- Ss- RV Pw Fq Nd- Rp- G Mm++ Bb++ Tcp+ L++
|
September 12th, 2002, 08:55 AM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cool tactic: Retrofitting on the Fly
There can be only one....
Wow, just had Deja Vu relating to the Highlander series.
Seriously, you can only have one planetary shipyard but multiple shipyards vessels/stations. Each planetary shipyard, spacestation yard or ship yard has it's own queue.
T-
__________________
===================================
Someday I'll tell my friends about this forum... Naaaah.
===================================
|
September 12th, 2002, 05:24 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 409
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cool tactic: Retrofitting on the Fly
Geo, I don't know why you would want to mothball the yards. My prefered strategy is almost centred around construction bases and I gain the edge by having LOTS of yards and out-producing everybody else. In fact the very first item on my "end turn check list" is to make sure that every yard is building something, and they only go on hold when I run out of resources.
__________________
A propeller is just a big fan in front of the plane designed to keep the pilot cool. Want prove? Stop the prop and watch the pilot break out in a heavy sweat!
|
September 12th, 2002, 05:45 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cool tactic: Retrofitting on the Fly
Aren't you better off mothballing the ships themselves?
__________________
'There are old space jockies and bold space jockies but there ain't no old, bold space jockies'
|
September 12th, 2002, 06:35 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cool tactic: Retrofitting on the Fly
Not to reply for Geo, but I would use his method of a "mothballed construction center" as the back up in case things go wrong (like one of the front lines collapses, etc.). The mothballed bases would be located in a backwater area, unlikely to be probed by others, and so it's whereabouts would be unknown (the only change I'd make is to have 10 - 15 in a storm, with two unmothballed).
The majority of construction would still happen on my front lines and out of my home planets, but woe to those whose front lines collapse with no recourse! (it's always easier to reinforce from a central position than around the perimeter).
As to mothballing the ships that are constructed... I'd do this in a high cost research game, but in normal and low cost games the ships are improving to rapidly, and I couldn't be bothered to retrofit hundreds of ships every 10 turns. If they're old, scrap them for the resources (or mothball with the intention of scrapping them later) and only retrofit the experienced ships.
IMO
__________________
Jimbob
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
-Linus Pauling
Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
-Søren Kierkegaard
|
September 12th, 2002, 06:58 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cool tactic: Retrofitting on the Fly
Quote:
Originally posted by geoschmo:
A nice thing to do with bases is mothball them. Build 10 or 15 over a huge planet with a land based space yard that is in a quiet part of your empire and mothball them. Then if the situation changes and the enemy starts harrasing that area you can quickly unmothball them and have them cranking out units or ships to fill the holes in your defenses. Just In Time Inventory, SEIV style.
Geoschmo
|
Watch how often you do that. Taking ships in and out of mothball is something like a 30% cost in resources. If your Maintenance is 5%, you need to mothball them for over 6 turns before you have really saved anything.
|
September 12th, 2002, 07:00 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cool tactic: Retrofitting on the Fly
Quote:
Originally posted by jimbob:
Not to reply for Geo, but I would use his method of a "mothballed construction center" as the back up in case things go wrong (like one of the front lines collapses, etc.). The mothballed bases would be located in a backwater area, unlikely to be probed by others, and so it's whereabouts would be unknown (the only change I'd make is to have 10 - 15 in a storm, with two unmothballed).
The majority of construction would still happen on my front lines and out of my home planets, but woe to those whose front lines collapse with no recourse! (it's always easier to reinforce from a central position than around the perimeter).
As to mothballing the ships that are constructed... I'd do this in a high cost research game, but in normal and low cost games the ships are improving to rapidly, and I couldn't be bothered to retrofit hundreds of ships every 10 turns. If they're old, scrap them for the resources (or mothball with the intention of scrapping them later) and only retrofit the experienced ships.
IMO
|
I thought retrofitting removes ship experience.
|
September 12th, 2002, 07:05 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Cool tactic: Retrofitting on the Fly
[quote]Originally posted by LGM:
Quote:
Watch how often you do that. Taking ships in and out of mothball is something like a 30% cost in resources. If your Maintenance is 5%, you need to mothball them for over 6 turns before you have really saved anything.
|
True enough, but getting you maint down to 5% is pretty expensive I believe. I don't often do it. By default it's 25%. The absolute minimum you can have is 5% and that takes a LOT of racial points.
And yes, mothballing ships does cause them to lose their experience.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
September 12th, 2002, 11:01 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cool tactic: Retrofitting on the Fly
And retrofitting does not affect experience
__________________
Jimbob
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
-Linus Pauling
Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
-Søren Kierkegaard
|
September 13th, 2002, 12:25 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 1,277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cool tactic: Retrofitting on the Fly
Yea so if I build some basic hulls, I can train them cheaply and then start to retrofit in the expensive stuff.
__________________
So many ugly women, so little beer.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|