Quote:
Cohen said:
True, Tien has mages with low but numberous paths.
Mmm ... the Abysyans generals could start thinking to plan the manchurian empire invasion to put those gems into their bags. Even because those manchurian are closing my expansion way on 2 sides.
|
Lies!!! This is outrageous propaganda of the first rank - do not be swayed the bile that spews from the mouths of the Abysian PR Minister!
Instead, we suggest that everyone put their cards on the table, and you the nations of Faerun can judge for yourself who is blocking who, and who
you should feel threatened by.
As all know, Abysia, T'ien Ch'i and the C'tis are all located near each other in the northeast corner of Faerun. To be specific, our capitals are at:
Abysia - 217
C'tis - 125
T'ien Ch'i - 272
Know that on turn 7, the Abysians took 302, capping any possible expansion we might have had to the northwest, and coming very close to our capital in the bargain. We then demanded that the Abysians stop their advance at that point, and they complied (but not without bellicose, but vague threats of a later invasion).
So, I guess the Abysian Minister of Dis-Information (maybe we shall call him Kim Jong-Il, or Baghdad Bob, henceforth), calls this "closing his expansion" well then I guess they mean that their intended expansion into our capital was closed.
Now, the second direction of closure to which Abysia no doubt refers is my recent move into 178 and 155. Well this does in fact block Abysia's expansion to the southeast - while opening my
only hope of having any expansion after Abysia's rapid move towards my capital, and blocking my access to the northwest.
Any who have the resources to send scouts or to scry can check the truth of my words, and I encourage all to do so. The situation is currently that Abysia and T'ien Ch'i each block each other's advance in one direction. We regard this as an acceptable status quo, but we fear that the rapaciousness and greed of the Abysians make this situation unstable.
Tao Lan
Emperor of the Mists
Lord of T'ien Ch'i