|
|
|
|
 |
|
December 30th, 2005, 10:44 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Going back to 24hrs
Just waiting on Ermor and Pythium...
|
December 30th, 2005, 10:47 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Going back to 24hrs
having the score graphs show me as having the largest army seems to instil in my neighbors a sense of peace
|
December 30th, 2005, 02:28 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,606
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Going back to 24hrs
note to self: be nice to man
|
December 30th, 2005, 03:13 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Going back to 24hrs
Quote:
shovah said:
note to self: be nice to man
|
This should read: note to self, take my turn
 |
December 30th, 2005, 03:38 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Going back to 24hrs
Quote:
Dimaz said:
It seems it will be really fast game for me, with Ulm and Machaka attacking me together.
|
Wow, already? Tho I suppose Ulm's early power is even stronger than usual in this game. If I'd started near them I'd be begging for my life until I got my research going 
Quote:
Wish_For_Blood_Slaves said:
having the score graphs show me as having the largest army seems to instil in my neighbors a sense of peace
|
Hahahah. Tho its still so early the graphs can change pretty wildly. Lose your starting army and suddenly you are the weakest around. |
December 30th, 2005, 04:09 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,606
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Going back to 24hrs
my turns in
|
December 30th, 2005, 04:21 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Going back to 24hrs
Quote:
Tho I suppose Ulm's early power is even stronger than usual in this game
|
what the heck are you smoking? Ulm always sucks, at any stage of the game. It is not unusually strong to begin w/, lol. If you would care to test this in a blitz, I'd be happy to oblige...
|
December 30th, 2005, 04:39 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Going back to 24hrs
new turns up, btw
|
December 30th, 2005, 04:44 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Going back to 24hrs
Quote:
archaeolept said:
Quote:
Tho I suppose Ulm's early power is even stronger than usual in this game
|
what the heck are you smoking? Ulm always sucks, at any stage of the game. It is not unusually strong to begin w/, lol. If you would care to test this in a blitz, I'd be happy to oblige...
|
Yes, lets. |
December 30th, 2005, 05:40 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Going back to 24hrs
quantum is very good at expanding. the sun armor helps I am sure.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
