.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPMBT > TO&Es
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old June 2nd, 2009, 11:16 AM
Suhiir's Avatar

Suhiir Suhiir is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
Suhiir is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Tank carry capacity

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suhiir View Post
May want to change this to "which non engineer/mine clearing tanks that do not have an active defence system don't have a carry capacity?"

*gives a cute smile and bats her eyes*


The reason "engineer/mine clearing" tanks are NOT given a carry capacity should be obvious to anyone with an imagination and that is why I didn't include that in my comment.

Don
I quite agree...it "should be".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobhack View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imp View Post
Don
Okay so the Abrams is the exeption due to training the criteria for not having a carry capacity are missile defence or reactive armour. It was the fact the Abrams cant & the Leo can that first struck me as why.

Finland MBT (15) T-55MS has VIRSS & carry capacity is only one I know of that does not conform.
I have the seating diagram for an M1 somewhere in the US Army PDF field manuals. I cannot find it but recall several problems, which may be why it is only used non-tactically.

- The engine exhaust causes problems with possible cooked troops. Thus loading and unloading requires care, and not to be done over the rear. So probably only at the halt (no turning tracks to eat troops limbs).

- The M1 has to disengage turret traverse while carrying.

- the section had to sit in a set pattern on the turret top - not the rear engine decks.

Cannot recall if any discussion of the blow out ammo panels not being sat on - as if they had suffered a catastrophic hit that caused the blow outs to pop then the infantry section would likely already be strawberry jam a few milliseconds before that event happened!.

In reality - M1s in combat have enough kit tied all over the turret that the clean configuration required to give some guys a lift is not available. And US formations will have enough APCS and Humvees that administrative lift perched on top of the turret is not needed.

Tactically - the requirement to halt for mounting, take extrem care from exhaust heat, disengagement of the gun turret, and the highly exposed position of the grunts all sat around the rim of the turret, are all bad. Tank riding is just not needed.

Andy
Ahh ha!
The "real" answer!

Thanks Andy.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie

People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.