|
|
|
|
 |
|
June 18th, 2003, 12:23 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheric conditioners or ringworlds?
Quote:
|
Still, nothing beats system after system of 100% oxy worlds, sparkling in in the sun [Big Grin]
|
Nothing, that is, except system after system of sparkling 100% oxy worlds, each one with a spanking enormous ringworld in the middle of it=-) |
June 18th, 2003, 06:43 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheric conditioners or ringworlds?
Why bother with ringworlds if you can have sphereworlds?  |
June 18th, 2003, 08:52 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheric conditioners or ringworlds?
Quote:
Originally posted by Q:
Why bother with ringworlds if you can have sphereworlds?
|
Good point!  |
June 18th, 2003, 09:55 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheric conditioners or ringworlds?
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|
June 18th, 2003, 10:26 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheric conditioners or ringworlds?
So switch the images around. It will do nothing to hinder MP games (as long as you just change the BMPs, not the data files). |
June 19th, 2003, 12:42 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 558
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheric conditioners or ringworlds?
Quote:
Originally posted by Q:
Why bother with ringworlds if you can have sphereworlds?
|
Because it takes far less resources to build. After i have those ringworlds, they will produce enough resources to allow me to build sphereworlds. But for now, i'll stick with ringworlds until i have so much resources, i'll drown in them
__________________
A Se++ GdY $++ Fr+ C++++ Csc Sf++ Ai** AuO M MpT MpSk MpFd S--- Ss- RV Pw Fq Nd- Rp- G Mm++ Bb++ Tcp+ L++
|
June 19th, 2003, 01:25 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 558
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheric conditioners or ringworlds?
I'm actually working on that: every system has a system shield, all asteroid fields are in the process of being converted to planets ( 6 planet creators flying around ), ringworlds are being constructed (only 4-5 at a time because of the cost) and athmospheric converters (also only 3 systems at a time are converted because of the resource drain)
Anyway, i don't think i will complete everything because i think the AI will soon turn on me.
Luckily because of trade, they will loose a lot of trade too when they go at war with me
__________________
A Se++ GdY $++ Fr+ C++++ Csc Sf++ Ai** AuO M MpT MpSk MpFd S--- Ss- RV Pw Fq Nd- Rp- G Mm++ Bb++ Tcp+ L++
|
June 19th, 2003, 02:49 PM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheric conditioners or ringworlds?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
) And since at this stage you don't really care about winning anymore, aesthetics is the only criteria that matters 
Linear Mode
