|
|
|
|
|
January 19th, 2004, 09:29 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Maps, theory discussion
Isn't Google wonderful Tesco?
|
January 19th, 2004, 09:54 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Maps, theory discussion
google i am alittle more refined than that cookie cutter search engine.
Yea I was being funny.... I was laughing the whole time i was making that post...
__________________
RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
old avatar = http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...1051567998.jpg
Hey GUTB where did you go...???
He is still driving his mighty armada at 3 miles per month along the interstellar highway bypass and will be arriving shortly
|
January 19th, 2004, 09:59 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Maps, theory discussion
We all know you used Google Tesco.
|
January 19th, 2004, 10:06 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Maps, theory discussion
Hmm... for the sake of readablilty it would probably be better to represent the tetrahedrons differently. Like this. code:
---------------#-------------\
/ \ /---------\ \
| ----------------#---------\ \ \
|/ ------------\ / \ /-----\ \ \ \
||/ ------------#---#-----\ \ \ \ \
|||/ --------\ / \ / \ /-\ \ \ \ \ \
||||/ --------#---#---#-\ \ \ \ \ \ \
|||||/ ----\ / \ / \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
||||||/ #---#---#---#---#| | | | | | |
|||||\|/ \ / \ / \ / \ / | / / / / / /
||||| #---#---#---#---#--// / / / / /
|||\|/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / / / / / /
||| #---#---#---#---#---#-/ / / / /
|\|/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / / / /
\-#---#---#---#---#---#---#-/ / /
\ |\ |\ |\ / \ / \ / \ / /
\ \ \ \ \ \ #---#---#---#-/
\ \ \ \ \ \---/| /| /|
\ \ \ \ \-----/ / / / /
\ \ \ \-------/ / / /
\ \ \---------/ / /
\ \-----------/ /
\-------------/
Oh yeah, sure. That's more readable...
[ January 19, 2004, 20:54: Message edited by: Loser ]
|
January 19th, 2004, 11:03 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Maps, theory discussion
|
January 19th, 2004, 11:24 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Maps, theory discussion
Neat ideas.
I think for a competetive "fair" game, it makes a lot of sense to just show both players the map to start with. Otherwise, even without Ancient being used, there is a lot dependent on discovery, which is a shot in the dark.
The economics of the unmodded game favor the fastest, most massive expansion so much that rapid planet grabbing is the most important factor between skilled competetive players.
You guys are gonna make all these maps right?
The "Fair" map used in the Universe Cup tourney was, I thought, about as fair as could be. It is completely symmetrical (lozenge- or football- shaped), and players were allowed to study the map before play. It did get a bit dull playing on the same map after a while, though. Maybe someone could make some more maps that are completely symmetrical.
On the other hand, I tend to like randomized maps even if they aren't as fair.
Has anyone made any mods that have expansion economies half-way between Proportions and unmodded?
PvK
|
January 19th, 2004, 11:40 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Maps, theory discussion
Check out the B5 Mod. Or P&N PBW. Both of those have slowed down economic expansion, but certainly not as far as Proportions.
And for the record, even Proportions favors he who can expand the fastest. It is diluted, but fast expansion is still important.
[ January 19, 2004, 21:43: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|
January 20th, 2004, 12:53 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Maps, theory discussion
I've never used the map editor. Is it possible to set up a static arrangement of systems and randomly populate them?
|
January 20th, 2004, 02:17 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Maps, theory discussion
Alright, here it comes. code:
/---------------\
|/-------------\ \
#-------------\ \ \
/-\ /|\ /---------\ \ \ \
/ /-# | #---------\ \ \ \|
/ / /|\|/|\ /-----\ \ \ \||
/ / || # | #-----\ \ \ \|||
|/ || |\|/|\ /-\ \ \ \||||
|| |\ | # | #-\ \ \ \|||||
|| | \|/|\|/|\ \ \ \||||||
|| | # | # || \ \|||||||
|| \ /|\|/| || \||||||||
|| /-# | # | /| |||||||||
|| / /|\|/|\|/ | |||||||||
||/ || # | # | |||||||||
||| || |\|/|\ / |||||||||
||| |\ | # | #-\ |||||||||
||| | \|/|\|/|\ \ |||||||||
||| | # | # || \|||||||||
||| \ /|\|/| || ||||||||||
||| /-# | # | /| ||||||||||
|||/ /|\|/|\|/ | ||||||||||
|||| || # | # | ||||||||||
|||| || |\|/|\ / ||||||||||
|||| |\ | # | #-\ ||||||||||
|||| | \|/|\|/|\ \||||||||||
|||| | # | # || |||||||||||
|||| \ /|\|/| || |||||||||||
||||/-# | # | /| |||||||||||
|||||/|\|/|\|/ | |||||||||||
||||||| # | # | |||||||||||
||||||| |\|/|\ / |||||||||||
||||||\ | # | #-\|||||||||||
|||\|\ \|/|\|/|\||||||||||||
\\\-# \ # | # ||||||||||||||
\\/ \|/|\|/| ||||||||||||||
\---# | # | /|||||||||||||
|\|/|\|/ /|/||||||||||
| # | # / #-/|||||||||
| |\|/|\|/ \-/////////
| | # | #----////////
| |/|\|/ \---///////
\ ||| #------//////
\\\\ \-----/////
\\\\-------////
\\\-------///
\\-------//
\-------/
Whoa, that one's messy.
I think there's an error.
Can you find it!?!?
[edit: by the way, that's an icosahedron with an extra system midway along each edge. you might be more liekyl to recognize an icosahedron if I called it a D20]
[ January 20, 2004, 00:28: Message edited by: Loser ]
|
January 20th, 2004, 02:49 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 68
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Maps, theory discussion
You could try for HyperCubes, which are one of the models minimizing the connectivity between multiprocessor systems. Ones with LOTS of processors.
Remember, the perfectly predicable map is, ummm, BORING!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|