|
|
|
|
|
December 30th, 2005, 08:33 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Searching for a holy grail.
Posts: 1,001
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
He still looks tiny which was my point. The problem with Hollywood Urban legends is that they're rarely as strange as truth.
After Terminator came out if you said Arnie will be "The Governator" or he's only 5ft everyone would have gone for the short option.
__________________
He who disagrees with me in private, call him a fool. He who disagrees with me in public, call him an ambulance.
|
December 30th, 2005, 01:51 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: At work or sleeping
Posts: 821
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
His ego is definitely taller on Opra's couch.
__________________
Aa Turam Empire
Geekdom is eternal... you will be assimilated... resistance is futile.
A+ Se GdY S++ Fr- C* Cs* Sf- Ai++ Au>M! M- Mp! S@ Ss+ R! Pw+ Fq++ Nd? Rp++ G++ Mm++ Bb-- L-- Tcp
'We, the weird, chasing the pointless, for no reason at all, have been finding out things that have no effect on anything important for at least a couple days and are now qualified to chase our tails to the merriment of all watching.'-Narf et al
"Of course, you don't want to be going about handing out immortality willy-nilly, that just wouldn't be responsible." -O'Shea
|
December 30th, 2005, 05:14 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outter Glazbox
Posts: 760
Thanks: 12
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
"Camera angle" is everything in hollywood. If your short then your in front and the camera is below your shoulders AND wolla! YOUR BIG! Arnold and Sly are around 5'9" - 5'7" and are always shot from a lower angle to make them appear larger then life! John Wayne always rode a smaller horse to make him appear larger then he was. Hollywood, where anything is possible, even Galaxy's far, far away.
|
December 30th, 2005, 07:08 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Quote:
Xrati said:
"Camera angle" is everything in hollywood. If your short then your in front and the camera is below your shoulders AND wolla! YOUR BIG! Arnold and Sly are around 5'9" - 5'7" and are always shot from a lower angle to make them appear larger then life! John Wayne always rode a smaller horse to make him appear larger then he was. Hollywood, where anything is possible, even Galaxy's far, far away.
|
Gak! I don't know about Stallone, but Arnold Schwartzenegger is 6'2" - I know this because Arnold was beaten out for 'The Hulk' role by Lou Ferrigno because he is 6'5"!
|
December 30th, 2005, 08:48 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Yep, Sly isn't a tall man. If you ever saw pictures of him with Bridget Nielsen you can see it. If you think about it everybody in the Rocky movies, Carl weathers, Mr. T., Micky, was a little on the short side so he didn't seem too short by comparison. Then in Rocky 4 when they brought our Dolph Lundgren he looked like a giant, but he was only 6'5" or so. But next to Sly he looked 8 feet tall.
John Wayne was one of the tallest actors in Hollywood though at the time he was working. He was 6'4". Not saying they didn't put him on a small horse to make him look even bigger though. Course it might have been just so they could keep him in the frame with the other actors.
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
December 31st, 2005, 02:58 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 84
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Ahem...
Hollywood be darned; who do ya think should play Honor?
|
December 31st, 2005, 03:11 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Sylvester Stallone is 5'10"
__________________
May you be forever touched by His noodly appendage.
|
December 31st, 2005, 06:55 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Quote:
El_Phil said:
She is indeed easy on the eye, which is never a bad thing.
Starhawk, me old matey, cynicism is good for the soul. It's also normally always right with the advantage that when you are wrong it's normally a nice change.
Case in point: Serenity. A series of joy that was cancelled and a movie that just broke even. It'll be a brave movie exec who makes a sequel. Compare with, say, Lethal Weapon 4. One of the most derivate, predictable films ever made and the only thing stopping part 5 is Mel Gibson has gone barking mad and is making films in Mayan about ancient Mexico.
Hell Rocky VI is in the can and Rambo 4 is on it's way. No brain formulaic movies make money, as do their sequels.
That ain't being negative, it's fact.
|
If you say so, but please consider:
* Is there any reason why even derivative sequels _have_ to be so badly made, either for games or for films? Surely with the huge budgets invested, someone could invest some more taste, talent, or other qualities? Do the _have_ to be so bad to make money? Wouldn't they make more money if they were better derivative sequels than they generally are?
* Just because some crappy business practice makes money, doesn't mean I or you or anyone _has_ to care, purchase, or pay any attention to the crappy products. For example, we're still here playing Space Empires IV, a _good_ sequel, and I never even bothered with MOO3, a crappy sequel, or most other low-gameplay megacorp releases, or most Hollywood (i.e. crappy) films.
* By paying for, paying attention to, and mentioning acceptance of such crappy practices, one becomes part of the problem.
PvK
|
January 1st, 2006, 11:00 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 84
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
PvK has a point. And also, you're more likely to keep your audience and possibly grow it by making a respectable series of movies. Sort of like star wars, only not overbearingly shiney to the point of sacraficing content. Sort of like Harry Potter who, despite my own reservations, is a pretty good example of how to continue a sustainable movie franchise.
|
January 2nd, 2006, 11:17 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,389
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT- Honour Harrington movie
Yah know who would make a good Honor Harrington
http://www.perfectpeople.net/picpage.php3/cpid=83531
Awwwww China
Seriously from what I've seen she's an okay actress and she's fairly tall AND she fits the "good looking Asian/Caucasian" mix that HH would require
__________________
When life gives you lemons take them and squeeze them in life's eye until it gives you the oranges you asked for!
"If men build things to look like our penis such as towers and ships does that mean female achitects represent women having penis envy?"
A line that made me chuckle, I can't remember where I heard it I just know it made me laugh.
"I'm not really a slapper....I mainly punch and gouge."
Tammy Lee my kung fu instructor/sifu's daughter when asked if she ever slapped a boy for saying something nasty to her.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|