|
|
|
|
|
October 6th, 2008, 12:21 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 323
Thanks: 18
Thanked 32 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War (upgraded to 3.20)
Where are we now in this game?
Could any observer tell us where we stand?
|
October 6th, 2008, 12:30 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War (upgraded to 3.20)
i think we're still squabbling about victory conditions
as there were 3 types of victory conditions
Neutral: QM clearly has the lead here. whether it is enough to hold up against a concerted alliance, I don't know.
Good: Ulm kept the alliance together - Pythium's success is due to CU, so i think Ulm has the edge here
Evil: there can only be one Burninator
Personally, I liked the idea of this game, where each side has different restrictions and conditions. I'd say that denying both death and blood to Good is too much though - death is too important. Perhaps a lesser restriction on death magic? Also, something needs to be done to get the neutrals involved and not able to just watch and turtle.
|
October 6th, 2008, 08:44 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 947
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War (upgraded to 3.20)
I'm glad you liked it, archaeolept! I enjoyed it, too. I'm not sure how much the Neutrals liked it because there never was any reason for them to do anything. That would definitely need to be changed for a second game.
In my opinion, QM is probably the most powerful, although I can't count Ryleh out due to how he handed me my a$$ in a previous game as Ryleh. Also Pangea is pretty stout as well.
I took the server down, but I can put it back up if we decide to continue.
|
October 6th, 2008, 08:56 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War (upgraded to 3.20)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CUnknown
I'm glad you liked it, archaeolept! I enjoyed it, too. I'm not sure how much the Neutrals liked it because there never was any reason for them to do anything. That would definitely need to be changed for a second game.
In my opinion, QM is probably the most powerful, although I can't count Ryleh out due to how he handed me my a$$ in a previous game as Ryleh. Also Pangea is pretty stout as well.
I took the server down, but I can put it back up if we decide to continue.
|
Please put it up so somone can take a look at it and give us some closure.
If Foodstamp isn't available I nominate Micah as judge.
|
October 9th, 2008, 02:57 AM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War (upgraded to 3.20)
*Bump*
Is the holdup getting the master password from foodstamp?
|
October 9th, 2008, 07:36 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 947
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War (upgraded to 3.20)
I asked Foodstamp to check out the game, it stayed up for a week, I don't think he ever checked it. The server is off right now...
Is someone else going to check it? They should contact me so I can put the server back up if so.
|
October 10th, 2008, 11:39 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 2,059
Thanks: 229
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War (upgraded to 3.20)
Oh it seemed like no one was interested in this game being checked. That is why I never did do it after I got the appropriate IP etc.
It may be better if someone else judge it anyway because I was going to call it a draw unless someone met the predefined victory conditions.
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
|
October 11th, 2008, 03:30 AM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War (upgraded to 3.20)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foodstamp
It may be better if someone else judge it anyway because I was going to call it a draw unless someone met the predefined victory conditions.
|
I have to agree that rather defeats the point of a judge.
|
October 11th, 2008, 11:36 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 2,059
Thanks: 229
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War (upgraded to 3.20)
I'm afraid any other judgment would just be opinion .
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
|
November 4th, 2008, 01:04 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 12
Thanked 86 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War (upgraded to 3.20)
After reviewing the various turn files it is evident that there is not a clear winner of the game. Shinuyama has a slight lead, but Rlyeh is close enough to be arguably tied in power, and Pangaea is in a strong third place that could tip the balance either way or potentially weasel his way into first if the other two began to duke it out in earnest, especially with help from the remaining nations.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|