|
|
|
|
|
February 9th, 2006, 06:58 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: 24hr Vote
There is no need for ultimatums. Clearly you are voting for 48hrs then.
|
February 9th, 2006, 07:11 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: 24hr Vote
I have to vote for 48 in order to let Arch get his turn in; it would be uninteresting without proper thinking. I would want extra time if I were in the same position.
|
February 9th, 2006, 08:22 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: 24hr Vote
I'll vote 48 hours also.
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|
February 9th, 2006, 11:14 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: 24hr Vote
sure there's a need for ultimatums. I'm fighting a five front war, and barely have enough time to get a turn in at the present schedule. 24 hrs is not an acceptible option for me at all, as you should clearly know. The results of a "vote" are irrelevant.
|
February 9th, 2006, 04:57 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: 24hr Vote
Well, since I know that QM favors 48hrs as well it would seem that the consensus favors you anyway (4-2). 48hrs it is!
|
February 14th, 2006, 03:46 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Ermor = Evil
Let it be known that the necrophagic, zombie-loving, vestal virgin-wasting pile of festering maggots-smelling nation of Ermor has backstabbed me. And I am shocked beyond words. Except for these.
- Hakitursar of Jotunheim
|
February 14th, 2006, 04:25 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Ermor = Evil
Did he actually backstab you? Like you had a NAP and he broke it without warning?
|
February 14th, 2006, 11:22 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ermor = Evil
Nope. Didn't have a NAP. Saturday on IRC there was talk of a NAP, I simply said that Ermor was very peaceful, but never agreed to NAP.
Edit : Only formal NAP I have had all game is a 5 turn one with C'Tis, having had less formal friendly arrangements with other such nations as Man. Never an arrangement with Mictlan or Jotuns, nor with the nations I've not yet even met such as Abysia and Vanheim.
Then there's under-the-table dealings, such as taking bribes not to attack a specific third party nation for "a turn or two".
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|
February 14th, 2006, 11:27 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Ermor = Evil
morkilus just seems to be shocked that somone would presume to do to him exactly what he did to me
|
February 14th, 2006, 02:43 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Ermor = Evil
Morkilus is not shocked (we did not in fact have a pact). Hakitursar is shocked and angry, and shall soon be visiting the front lines of the total war between us. Nimmu (or whatever he calls himself) shall be humbled once and for all. You may win deathmatches aplenty, but the weight of thousands of Jotun feet shall crush you.
-Hakitursar of Jotunheim
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|