|
|
|
|
|
September 30th, 2005, 05:49 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: The Council of Wyrms
Quote:
Arralen said:
Rule 17:
No Wyrms into death match !
|
I don't think they can, without hand slots.
|
September 30th, 2005, 06:57 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,606
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Council of Wyrms
i thought they could, havnt tested it with latest patch though
|
September 30th, 2005, 07:13 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, ME (USA)
Posts: 3,241
Thanks: 31
Thanked 65 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: The Council of Wyrms
|
September 30th, 2005, 08:06 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: The Council of Wyrms
Well... It looked like Panther was in doubt...
Btw, I'm reasonably certain that I've seen plenty of instances of critters without handslots participating in the deathmatch; not in the latest patch, undoubtedly, but has it been changed at any point, then? Wouldn't really make sense to me.
Why shouldn't the wyrms be allowed in the deathmatch, if it's possible? I should suggest instead giving the reigning deathmatch champion a limited veto, or other diplomatical benefit: it's a unique event and as it is, no one is interested in it. Something could be done to make it more cool by house rules, just to make things more interesting. Then, I guess nothing stops the Council from passing a statement that everyone must pay 100g to the winner of the match, if that's whats desired, so it really needn't be enforced in the rules... Just thinking out loud, never mind me; I'm guessing this will be a highly interesting game! (And a terrible timesink, so not for me, but still.)
|
September 30th, 2005, 09:17 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: The Council of Wyrms
has anyone claimed man yet? if not i'll do so. also I ran a search in the mods forum for zen 4.0 but could not find it.
|
September 30th, 2005, 11:14 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: west of DC
Posts: 587
Thanks: 6
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: The Council of Wyrms
OK, I'll take Marignon. I knew it was inevitable when I realized I had named not only my pretender, but also each of his two heads.
If puffyn hosts another wiki for this game, I'll do my share in helping to get it organized.
WfBS: I believe Zen 4.0 is what is called "Conceptual Balance" over in the mod forum (and is now at 5.0).
|
October 1st, 2005, 12:10 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: The Council of Wyrms
so are we doing 4.0 or 5.0?
|
October 1st, 2005, 12:37 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: The Council of Wyrms
Hehehe. After all the rule revisions I'm totally jealous of everyone who is playing now Sadly I just really wont have time.
|
October 1st, 2005, 04:00 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 500km from Ulm
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: The Council of Wyrms
Wyrms in deathmatch
- just tested: A Wyrm can enter deathmatch (o.c.). It gets 100Exp + x Exp (from hits). It does not get the trident, though.
- Haven't tested if it's obliged to enter then next deathmatch, though
- a bug: A blind Wyrm can hit his adversary regularly, at least in deathmatch
Why not
Why should a Wyrm attend a deathmatch? It's a WYRM. The ruler-of-all. It doesn't have to prove it can eat others for breakfeast, right? Besides, such activities are such common - how could any self-respecting Wyrm attend to them and go back to the council to meet his kin?
Frankly, I searched for something -however small- that would speak for not playing a Wyrm in this game.
__________________
As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
|
October 1st, 2005, 10:12 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: The Council of Wyrms
Dear Pasha,
I would recommend that you address me with all due respect, for otherwise I might be annoyed with you. Have you checked if you have the ability to participate in this game without creating a conflict of interests, given your other activities? Did you register your possession of special abilities (we shall label those abilities as being lawyerliness) in Council? Did you check the penalties for defamation against a Justice of the Council? I thought so.
Therefore, it is the opinion of the court that the aforementioned Pasha should adopt a more fitting demeanour: failure to comply with this ruling shall result in the termination of the offending individual.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|