|
|
|
|
|
December 19th, 2006, 03:32 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
My preference is for non-cumulative VPs, though of course the host has the final say.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
December 19th, 2006, 03:36 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
How about this - whoever controls the most provinces when the next President of the US is sworn in, is the winner ?
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
December 19th, 2006, 04:00 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
VP's, I will go with whatever the host thinks.
Turnaround, 24hr quickhost is great for the early game, turns 1-20 but I recommend 48hr quickhost after that, otherwise you will get lots of players having stale turns.
|
December 19th, 2006, 04:24 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East Norriton, PA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
I am in favor of non-cumilative VPs.
That way the winner will still be the most powerful/most land, but you dont have to conquer every last thing. It also eliminates the frustration of turtling water nations.
|
December 19th, 2006, 05:04 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 304
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
If we are voting, I vote for VP, but it seems like most people don't want cumulative so I vote for Standard VP.
|
December 19th, 2006, 05:05 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
Non-cumulative VPs sounds good to me too. Adds a bit of extra interest and strategy, I'm guessing, if particular provinces have greater value.
Also 24H quickhost sounds good for as long as we can make it work. It was still working well in the newbie game (21 players I think) when I got knocked out, which was turn 45 or so.
|
December 19th, 2006, 05:21 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Argentina
Posts: 478
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
Standar VP seems. The rest as it´s set.
__________________
" Jefe, le presento a Manuk, el hombre de la sonrisa de hierro "
|
December 19th, 2006, 05:38 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game
Despite the fact tht most of the subjects here say "Re: New game PBEM" I assume this game will in fact be TCP/IP hosted (not PBEM)? I personally vote against PBEM because it sounds like such a pain.
I meant non-cumulative VP's when I suggested we play with VP's. I would actually vote against cumulative VP's myself.
|
December 19th, 2006, 05:41 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 223
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Game PBEM
Ok, I will set up the game as soon as I get home.
So glory of the gods multiplayer
all standard settings
what about
renaming on?
hall of fame entries 15?
score graphs enabled or disabled?
Victory points
(1 per capitol) = 20 points
10 1 point provinces = 10 points
5 2 point provinces = 10 points
5 3 point provinces = 15 points
55 victory points with 20 needed to win (or of course defeating everyone else in the game).
I think that set-up will make for an exciting game. Alliances will have to 'cede' territories to a single nation in the alliance in order for victory to be achieved. Otherwise a win by an alliance would be too easy.
Edit: Yes Virtual it will be TCP/IP; Manuk was going to host a PBEM game because he only has dial-up and I offered to host for him.
__________________
Regno Dominatio
|
December 19th, 2006, 05:48 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Argentina
Posts: 478
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New TCPIP game
score enabled. VP public right?
I think allies should name one of them a winner since can only will be 1 god.
[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/icon09.gif[/img]
__________________
" Jefe, le presento a Manuk, el hombre de la sonrisa de hierro "
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|