|
|
|
|
|
February 9th, 2007, 05:11 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 790
Thanks: 7
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug - battle report does not agree with strate
Sounds like a bug we had in dom2, where linux host and windows client gave us wrong battle reviews.
http://www.shrapnelcommunity.com/thr...=&fpart=1&vc=1
Is it equal discribed in the dom2 thread above?
|
February 9th, 2007, 10:19 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 202
Thanks: 98
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Save and quit
Save and quit when connected to the server actually uploads the 2h file even though the warning message says it will not upload.
This can cause problems when the server is on quick host and you are the last player to take his turn. It can cause premature end turns.
I guess just changing the warning message would be handy.
|
February 9th, 2007, 05:39 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 359
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug - battle report does not agree with strate
It's possible, but to find out for sure, we need to know what systems people are running on. Regardless, it seems unlikely since my opponent says he saw the same thing I did, so the source of the bug is more likely to be the server than an inconsistency based on the difference between server and player OS's. Although I suppose I really don't understand this OS-based bug, since someone in D2 claims to have seen it in SP?
I'm running 3.06 on a Mac. DrPraetorius, what system is the server running?
Terrel, my opponent, says he saw pretty much the same thing I did. I'll try to get him to comment here with any additional details from his side, especially what OS he's using!
|
February 9th, 2007, 06:05 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 449
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug - battle report does not agree with strate
Quote:
Ewierl said:
...
Terrel, my opponent, says he saw pretty much the same thing I did. I'll try to get him to comment here with any additional details from his side, especially what OS he's using!
|
Its like Ewierl said, I saw the same thing he did, so that doesn't sound like the OS bug to me. FWIW, I'm running WinXP.
|
February 9th, 2007, 07:06 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug - battle report does not agree with strate
I'm also running Windows XP, dominions version 3.06.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
February 9th, 2007, 10:05 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Urban Wilderness
Posts: 258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New bug in 3.06
Units revived via Ritual of Rebirth who were thousands of years old at the time of their death (even if they were not old!) result in a mummy with old age.
The starting age for the mummy should be 0 (it was just created), or the maxage should be 1000 + the base age of the creature being revived.
|
February 10th, 2007, 03:23 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 68
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Instant drowning freespawn; changing forge orders
Quote:
Jack_Trowell said:
[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Bug.gif[/img] the war shamblers for a mercenary group are described as having a shark skin armor (and the sprite seems inded to wear something), but the War shamblers have no armor.
|
The same unit (War Shambler) is a ME Atlantis recruitable; again description mentions sharkskin armor, sprite has the armor, unit doesn't have armor.
|
February 10th, 2007, 03:56 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 559
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
More on the Unholy Bless Bug
Deleted.
|
February 14th, 2007, 09:00 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: R'lyeh
Posts: 3,861
Thanks: 144
Thanked 403 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug thread
Spelling errors: PD should be called Defense, not Defence in the map screen. There's no fence in Defense. There is no such word as Shamen - it's called Shamans in english, too. It is not a man from Sha or something, so you can't build the plural like that.
I got lots of other spelling errors, but I don't know if I should list all of them?
Bug: It is possible to assign "Corrupt Commander" and "Seduce enemy Commander" actions to other units who don't have the necessary skill to do so. This should have already been reported, otherwise ask me via PM how to reproduce it.
Bug: The hero Sköge has only the name "Sk" when you get him. In his description it is correctly listed as "Sköge".
--
I am fairly certain that for every map that you randomly generate, the computer "forgets" to assign neighbors for at least one province, so that this province only gains neighbors through adjacent provinces which reference it. But I haven't been doing extensive enough testing on that.
|
February 14th, 2007, 03:59 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug thread
Quote:
lch said:
Spelling errors: PD should be called Defense, not Defence in the map screen.
|
Defence is the British spelling, so most of the world spells it that way.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|