|
|
|
|
|
April 23rd, 2009, 05:04 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
Seeking Arrow Test (Updated 1st June 2009 to V1.1 with Death Bless tests)
For those interested, here are the results of some tests I ran regarding what items or effects help protect against the 'Seeking Arrow' spell.
The test involved sending seven lots of 10 x 'Seeking Arrow' spells against seven lots of 10 Indy Scouts, where the Scouts were equipped with nothing for the control (bare), shields (Small + Tower), Lucky Pendant, Robe of Missile Protection. I also tested for the increased chance of afflictions from a Death Bless, testing D6 (200%) and D10 (400% and Death Weapons). The Death Bless tests were carried out against bare Scouts.
This test was repeated 30 times, giving the following results.
(I would like to show the complete result table here, but there doesn't appear to be any simple, and more importantly, visually pleasing way to show a table on the forum. So I will instead direct you to the zip file attached, which includes the test game I used, and the full results table [MSExcel File])
The end results show that out of 300 'Seeking Arrows' cast at....
300 Bare Scouts --- 151 died, 45 received afflictions.
300 Scouts equipped with a Small Shield (Parry 4) --- 150 died, 39 received afflictions.
300 Scouts equipped with a Tower Shield (Parry 8) --- 145 died, 57 received afflictions.
300 Scouts equipped with a Lucky Pendant --- 67 died, 25 received afflictions.
300 Scouts equipped with Robe of Missile Protection --- 14 died, 9 received afflictions.
300 Bare Scouts, caster had 200% affliction chance --- 137 died, 39 received afflictions.
300 Bare Scouts, caster had 400% affliction chance and death weapons --- 140 died, 43 received afflictions
All the Scouts were set to 'Defend'.
*** Note *** Units with 'Hide' or 'Sneak' orders can not be targetted with 'Seeking Arrow'.
Preliminary Conclusions.
- Out of those tested, only the 'Luck' or 'Air Shield' effect provided any protection against the 'Seeking Arrow' spell.
- A shield makes no difference.
- The Death Bless does not cause any extra afflictions.
When I get chance I will run further tests on the following.
- Etherealness
- Flaming Weapons from a Fire Bless.
- Regeneration (does it help avoid afflictions?)
- Cursed
- Twist Fate
Please feel free to comment, and if anyone knows of any other effects or variables they think might help for or against the success of 'Seeking Arrow', then please post in the thread and I'll add it to the list for the next test run.
Thank You for Reading.
---------------------------------
Updated 1st June 2009 to V.1.1
I have now tested the Death Bless more thoroughly with the 'Seeking Arrow' spell, and I can only conclude that it has no effect on the spell with regards having an increased chance of causing afflictions.
For the test I used Bane Lords, and 'Seeking Arrow' casters wearing a shroud which bestowed the Death Bless upon them. I tested the D4 bless, and the D10 bless.
For one of the test runs I also sent the shroud wearers into battle the turn before casting the 'Seeking Arrow' spell, as I heard there was the possibility that the effects of the bless gained from the shroud does not 'stick' unless the unit has been in an actual battle while wearing it.
I also tested the range of damage that was inflicted in order to try and establish the actual damage roll that takes place during the spell.
Results.
'Seeking Arrow' damage mechanics.
Over the course of 400 tests, the average damage observed was 8.2, which corresponds nicely to the indicated damage of the spell, which is 8. The range of damage was between 0 - 24. This seems to indicate that there is a bonus roll added to the damage from the spell, but also an equal resistance roll to reduce/negate the damage.
It has been suggested that the 'Seeking Arrow' spell does 8 + DRN ( - DRN) points of damage. I am now pretty convinced that this is true. Although I was not able to determine if re-rolls for 6's are unlimited or not.
The Death Bless
After 100 tests in each category, the following number of afflictions were observed
No Death Bless - 18
D4 Bless - 19
D10 Bless - 21
D10 Bless (afterbattle) - 16
In the final 100 tests, the shroud wearers were engaged in a battle the turn before they cast the 'Seeking Arrow' spells. All this was done to ensure as well as possible that there was no problem with the bless effects from the shroud in 'sticking' to the unit.
The affliction mechanics from the manual states that the chance of an affliction occurring is the % HP lost in the attack multiplied by any extra affliction chance, such as the one caused by the Death Bless.
A Bane Lord has 42 HP, and a D4 bless increases the affliction chance by 100%. Now if my understanding of the mechanics are correct, in theory if the Bane Lord is hit for 21 HP (50% chance of an affliction occurring) or more from a D4 blessed unit, there should be a 100% chance of an affliction occurring (50% increased by 100% is 100%). During the D4 test, there was one incidence of 21 HP of damage occurring, but no affliction was seen.
A D10 bless has a 400% chance of causing an affliction, so in theory if a Bane Lord is hit for 9 HP (approx >20% chance of an affliction occurring) or more from a D10 blessed unit, there should be a 100% chance of an affliction occurring. Here is the maths I'm basing this on in case anyone thinks 20% increased by 400% is only 80%.
20% increased by 100% is 40% - D4 bless
20% increased by 200% is 60% - D6 bless
20% increased by 300% is 80% - D8 bless
20% increased by 400% is 100% - D10 bless
So >20% increased by 400% is >100%. During both the D10 tests, there was 63 occurrences of 9 or more HP of damage occurring, but no affliction seen.
Conclusions.
-The damage roll/mechanic for the 'Seeking Arrow' spell is 8 + DRN ( - DRN) *** Note the defender roll is minus all the damage, and not just the extra damage. As it is possible for the defender to negate all the damage with a high enough roll.***
- The Death Bless has no effect when it comes to causing afflictions with the 'Seeking Arrow' spell.
I still have to run tests on other possible defences like etherealness, twist fate, regen etc. But I think I have tested all I can for the Death Bless, and have not once witnessed it having even the slightest effect with regards causing afflictions. (unless someone can suggest another way to test it).
The games used for these tests can be downloaded below.
'Thank You' to anyone who reads this and anyone who offers feedback.
(Note, will tidy this post up next chance I get.)
Last edited by Calahan; June 1st, 2009 at 05:52 PM..
Reason: updated to V.1.1
|
The Following 33 Users Say Thank You to Calahan For This Useful Post:
|
Agema, analytic_kernel, ano, Bananadine, BesucherXia, chrispedersen, cleveland, Diverted Traffic, DonCorazon, Doo, Endoperez, Falkor, fungalreason, GrudgeBringer, Horst F. JENS, Jarkko, Joelz, Kadelake, Knai, MaxWilson, Meglobob, Mysterio, oldrocker99, PsiSoldier, Reay, sansanjuan, sector24, Soyweiser, Stretch, tgbob, Tmoe, Wick, WingedDog |
April 23rd, 2009, 05:09 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Seeking Arrow Test
Wonderful tests, thanks!
There's no need to test flaming weapons bless because they apply (or at least should) only to melee attacks.
|
April 23rd, 2009, 05:30 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Seeking Arrow Test
Also, the seeking arrow is supposed to be magical, so a etheral unit should be the same as a bare unit.
Its still a good idea to test flaming weapons and etheral thou, just to check if the dominions mechanics are working as they should be. Its only through such tests we find out they are not.
On your above tests, everything worked as expected, except for me the affliction tests, I thought ritual spells that do damage cast by a blessed mage who has increased affliction chance would inflict more afflictons. But apparently not.
You could additionally test shield of valour, silver hauberk, amulet of missile protection and shroud of the battle saint with A10 air bless. All are supposed to give 80% air shield.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Meglobob For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 23rd, 2009, 05:33 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Serbia
Posts: 2,245
Thanks: 48
Thanked 84 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Seeking Arrow Test
Wouldn't the mage need to be carrying the shroud of the saint for the death bless to work on seeking arrow?
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Executor For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 23rd, 2009, 05:39 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Seeking Arrow Test
Quote:
Originally Posted by Executor
Wouldn't the mage need to be carrying the shroud of the saint for the death bless to work on seeking arrow?
|
Yes. I assumed he would be.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Meglobob For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 23rd, 2009, 05:40 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
Re: Seeking Arrow Test
Quote:
Originally Posted by ano
Wonderful tests, thanks!
There's no need to test flaming weapons bless because they apply (or at least should) only to melee attacks.
|
My curiosity with the flaming weapons is that I'm thinking they won't make any difference, but what happens if the target unit has fire immunity? Does that cancel out the arrow all together? It shouldn't, but this is Dominions, so who knows!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meglobob
On your above tests, everything worked as expected, except for me the affliction tests, I thought ritual spells that do damage cast by a blessed mage who has increased affliction chance would inflict more afflictions. But apparently not.
|
Yes I was very surprised by this as well. I was expecting any survivors to have multiple afflictions, but that theory just didn't pan out in testing. I'm really interested in running Death Bless tests on other rituals now, just to see if it's limited to 'Seeking Arrow' or not. It would certainly be another kick in the teeth for the Death Bless if in actual fact it doesn't work with rituals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Executor
Wouldn't the mage need to be carrying the shroud of the saint for the death bless to work on seeking arrow?
|
Check the test game. All mages were fully shrouded up
|
April 23rd, 2009, 05:47 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 539
Thanks: 15
Thanked 43 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
Re: Seeking Arrow Test
One of the problems with calculating afflictions from firing multiple arrows at a single province is the chance that the arrows will hit a survivor - where one arrow isn't guaranteed to kill a scout two are extremely likely to kill one. Killing power for two arrows fired against two scouts in one province is greater than the killing power of two arrows against scouts in two different provinces.
Those who survive (the afflicted) aren't likely to survive two, you regain hp when all arrows have been resolved. Though thinking about it, the effect would probably not be very significant on the results
From what I recall someone said that seeking arrows deal 8 AN Damage. That is: 8 damage + DRN - DRN per arrow.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Redeyes For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 23rd, 2009, 06:06 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
Re: Seeking Arrow Test
Thanks for the feedback so far. Keep it coming
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redeyes
One of the problems with calculating afflictions from firing multiple arrows at a single province is the chance that the arrows will hit a survivor - where one arrow isn't guaranteed to kill a scout two are extremely likely to kill one. Killing power for two arrows fired against two scouts in one province is greater than the killing power of two arrows against scouts in two different provinces.
Those who survive (the afflicted) aren't likely to survive two, you regain hp when all arrows have been resolved. Though thinking about it, the effect would probably not be very significant on the results
From what I recall someone said that seeking arrows deal 8 AN Damage. That is: 8 damage + DRN - DRN per arrow.
|
Yes, there is the problem that a lot of the scouts probably died from getting hit with two arrows. I didn't check every message every turn (2100 messages ) but I did check enough to notice that a single successful 'Seeking Arrow' does 8 damage + 'A Bit More'. And at the moment 'A Bit More' could certainly be a single DRN roll (I also read this, so assumed it for my tests until I could prove differently). I chose scouts mainly because 'Seeking Arrow' is usually spammed against human type mages, with 10HP being the average.
Given time (and patience!) I'm looking to test more accurately with single castings against a single target (to avoid a double strike), and to test the Death Bless again against high HP targets. Since maybe the extra afflictions are getting added, but it's not showing in the results properly because the units are dying.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Calahan For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 23rd, 2009, 06:57 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Seeking Arrow Test
Very odd that in both "Death Bless" cases not only did fewer scouts get afflictions, but fewer died as well.
Unless the difference isn't statistically significant? Looks like it should be, but that's just a guess.
|
April 23rd, 2009, 07:20 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Seeking Arrow Test
Great stuff! If you want to give the Afflictions a more thorough test, I'd recommend using a larger target, like Starspawns, or Pans, perhaps give them all 10 Prot through a mod so standardize the damage.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JimMorrison For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|