|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
December 15th, 2008, 10:04 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
ERA Armour
So far in the game the only reactive armour I have noticed is on Russian tanks & IFVs plus I think some stuff scheduled for service.
I thought nowadays most tanks carried it or am I wrong in assuming reactive armour models explosive armour?
|
December 17th, 2008, 05:25 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: ERA Armour
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imp
I thought nowadays most tanks carried it?
|
No, they don't. The russians are the only ones who have used it extensively on their tanks and have done most of the development work. The israelis were actually using it before the soviets did but eventually dropped it (for the most part at least) in favor of composite armors. The US has used it sparingly (M60 refit, Bradley and more recently Abrams TUSK on top of my head).
There are many reasons for these different courses of action.
|
December 17th, 2008, 05:43 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kladno, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,176
Thanks: 12
Thanked 49 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Re: ERA Armour
In the West it is taken more like ad hoc uparmoring until Something New And Shiny(tm) comes.
Israel: Improvement of protection of Centurions and M60 series against RPGs until the Centurions went away and M60s received new passive armor kits.
Britain: Protection of lower front armor of Challengers against RPGs.
USA: Improvement of protection of Marine M60s until the Marines got fully on the M1 bandwagon. Protection of M1 sides against RPGs in urban combat. RPotection of Bradleys.
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
|
December 18th, 2008, 02:58 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: ERA Armour
Thanks for the replies gents thought I had seen it but more a stop gap measure than anything else
|
December 18th, 2008, 01:27 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ERA Armour
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marek_Tucan
Britain: Protection of lower front armor of Challengers against RPGs.
|
The British don't use ERA. Those are just blocks of extra armour. I managed to prove that to the game designers a few years back, and they included it in the game. Have a look at the challenger 2+
|
December 18th, 2008, 02:31 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kladno, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,176
Thanks: 12
Thanked 49 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Re: ERA Armour
Thanks for correction, seems I got wrong info (pretty dated, too) identifying these panels as ERA. So composite it is then.
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
|
December 19th, 2008, 04:23 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 358
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: ERA Armour
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marek_Tucan
Thanks for correction, seems I got wrong info (pretty dated, too) identifying these panels as ERA. So composite it is then.
|
Have a look here for the full thread, it was back in the Version 2 days of MBT:
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showt...llenger&page=3
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|