|
|
|
|
|
November 25th, 2003, 05:57 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Announcing the start of the Ratings Bash I
This will be a simple four round, invitational tournament. Players will be seeded according to their current standings in Slynky's Space Empires IV Ratings Page.
This tournament is by invitation to the top 16 players currently listed in the Ratings. If any of the 16 choose not to compete, alternates will be chosen in order from the remaining players after the top 16. If 16 of the players in the current Ratings are not interested in competing, unranked players will be seeded at the bottom on a first some first serve basis, but the tournament will not be expanded beyond 16 players.
Here are the current rankings. The Ratings change constantly as games finish, but for tourney purposes these will be the rankings used.
Tourney Seed | Current Ranking | Player | Rating | Games |
---|
1 | 1 | Asmala | 1047 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Bbegemott | 1032 | 2 | 3 | 3 | Primitive | 1030 | 6 | 4 | 4 | Slynky | 1029 | 4 | 5 | 5 | RexTorres | 1018 | 1 | 6 | 6 | Gecko | 1016 | 3 | 7 | 8 | Alneyan | 1015 | 3 | 8 | 9 | Baron Grazic | 1015 | 3 | 9 | 10 | Gandalph | 1015 | 1 | 10 | 11 | Parabolize | 997 | 4 | 11 | 12 | Joachim | 985 | 1 | 12 | 13 | Roanon | 985 | 1 | 13 | 14 | Steal Dragon | 985 | 1 | 14 | 15 | Georgig | 984 | 1 | 15 | 18 | Lord Chane | 984 | 1 | 16 | 16 | Gozguy | 984 | 1 | Ranked Alternates | 20 | Geoschmo | 974 | 6 | 21 | Chronon | 969 | 2 | 22 | Deccan | 953 | 3 |
Want's to play, Unranked, but in the rankings alternates: (first come first served)
00 Tesco Samoa
Want's to play, Unranked and not in the rankings alternates: (first come first served)
None yet
Unable to participate at this time:
7 Phoenix-D
17 GrandpaKim
19 Loser
Here's the current bracket: This is subject to change if any of the invitees choose not to compete.
Check the bracket here.
All games will be one on one, Koth style. Game settings can be tweaked if the players both agree to it, but I will encourage no changes that will cause the games to go on too long. The idea is to get through this in a reasonable amount of time.
All players will agree to have the results of their games used for ranking purposes.
I will contact everybody by email, but feel free to state here if you are not interested.
Geoschmo
[ February 13, 2004, 18:14: Message edited by: geoschmo ]
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
November 25th, 2003, 07:45 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Something I just noticed. The bottom of the rankings has a cluster of four players at 984 points. These are arbitrarily ranked alphabetically as:
15 Georgig 984 1
16 Gozguy 984 1
17 GrandpaKim 984 1
18 Lord Chane 984 1
This is fine for the rankings, but not really fair to leave someone out of the tourney based on the letters in their name. Probably at least two of the top 16 won't play and then it won't be an issue. But if it is I will take these four players in the order they respond either in the thread or by email to notify me they wish to play. The alternative would be to have a play in game, but I really don't want to add another round.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
November 25th, 2003, 08:18 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: seiv.pbw.cc
Posts: 115
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
count me in :-) and i really don't care who will kick by butt but i prefer not to face rextorres or asmala which will be humiliating :-P
what about grid expand? i mean losers to face each other so we all can play four games? and i will know that i am at.. say.. 19th place
__________________
'artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity'
|
November 25th, 2003, 08:29 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Quote:
Originally posted by georgig:
what about grid expand? i mean losers to face each other so we all can play four games? and i will know that i am at.. say.. 19th place
|
Yeah, we can do that.
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
November 25th, 2003, 08:34 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Georgig, how could you be 19th out of 16 players? I believe that will be a bit hard. (In the tournament that is, there can be only 16 players)
I support your idea though, it will be useful for us who do not stand a chance of winning more than one game. (Even if I do pass against Grazic, I will likely face Asmala. So. )
|
November 25th, 2003, 08:42 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: seiv.pbw.cc
Posts: 115
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
ahh i thought this is an 18 players tournament :-P
__________________
'artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity'
|
November 25th, 2003, 08:59 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
strange... i joined the Ratings system... and i am in a few rated games... but not on the page...
__________________
RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
old avatar = http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...1051567998.jpg
Hey GUTB where did you go...???
He is still driving his mighty armada at 3 miles per month along the interstellar highway bypass and will be arriving shortly
|
November 25th, 2003, 09:02 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Quote:
Originally posted by tesco samoa:
strange... i joined the Ratings system... and i am in a few rated games... but not on the page...
|
Unless you have completed a rated game you won't show up on the list. If you are interested I'll put you down as the 7th alternate. That's not as bad as it sounds. I figure you got a decent chance at making it in.
I have updated the bracket with consoloation brackets. Everybody gets four games now, win or lose.
Geoschmo
[ November 25, 2003, 19:03: Message edited by: geoschmo ]
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
November 25th, 2003, 09:05 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Quote:
Originally posted by tesco samoa:
strange... i joined the Ratings system... and i am in a few rated games... but not on the page...
|
Tesco, all the people with an uncompleted Ratings game start with a 1000 points. Since we don't "really" know their ability, it seemed unfair to list players with the starting 1,000 points AHEAD of those who had completed a game, yet lost. So, we have over 30 members, I think, and 22 have completed at least one game.
Since Geo started the tourney, I'd hate to step on his feet but he might consider letting those with no games completed yet a member of the Ratings system act as alternates. Just a thought.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
November 25th, 2003, 09:07 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
I'm in.
Now...REALLY back to yard work this time. .
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|