|
|
|
|
January 17th, 2008, 02:42 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 509
Thanks: 84
Thanked 44 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
LA Ctis strategy?
Just wondering if anyone has played this nation and has some advice. If you wanted to work the undead angle, it seems like LA Ermor is the (much) better choice. Tomb Guards are pretty nice heavy infantry but they're not powerful offensively and they have a mapmove of 1.
The undead synergize with the poison slingers nicely. Your mages are pretty good artillery platforms, but your research is kind of weak and you have to spend a lot of time summoning and ferrying undead.
So where is the true strength of this nation? Any suggestions on pretender and scale design?
|
January 17th, 2008, 02:56 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: LA Ctis strategy?
Banefire.
__________________
There was a time/When people were alight/Stop this cold black machinery/Before we kill this mystery
- Leæther Strip
|
January 17th, 2008, 03:28 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: LA Ctis strategy?
C'tis's major strength is strong mages out of non-capital forts - a rarity in LA. As mentioned, their mages are seem to be custom made for banefire, but even at a much lower research level just skellispam plus fireballs is pretty effective particularly as you mix in a few poison slingers. They've also got some pretty nifty cap only heavy infantry (I prefer the Desert Rangers to the Tomb Guards, much more versatile), and of course the free undead raising though as you mention that tends to be weak sauce as you compare it to LA Ermor.
So, what this says to me (admittedly without extensive C'tis experience) is that what you need is lots of castles. Gold and extra castles are even more important for C'tis than most nations because what you need to do is make lots of mage factories. Your research isn't subpar from that point of view, compare the sauromancers to other non-cap mages. Your (relatively) free undead are not the centerpiece of your strategy as they are with Ermor, they're just some disposable free chaff that is there to tie up the enemy while your superior artillery rains down on them. Ideally you want to minimize the amount of infantry you recruit so you can focus on maximum mage output, that's where the free undead come in. You don't need overwhelming undead numbers like Ermor does, you just need enough to keep the enemy archers busy while your skellispam shuffles up so your mages don't get hit.
Because of the AOE of the slingers and lack of stacking you just want a handful. Likewise you just want a handful of heavy infantry guarding your mages from flyer/flankers. Next, you've got to realize that a mage-centered army is just that, and you need critical mass of mages because you sure can't count on the longdead to carry much. If you focus tightly on getting mages you should have a lot more than your typical opponent, so don't feel bad about pulling some of them off of research much earlier than you usually would to rain down the pain.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
January 19th, 2008, 03:07 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: LA Ctis strategy?
Baalz, I disagree. A good strategy is fire arrows, animate archers, and tomb wyrms. And throw in some live units in the mix, too.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|