|
|
|
|
|
January 31st, 2004, 11:14 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Unit matchups
Hi, I'm sure this is a really dumb question, but I've looked around and haven't been able to find the answer.
Do units and / or weapons have inherent advantages against another? (Aside from weapon range and how it applies to repel attempts.) For instance, in other games I've played, all else being equal, pikemen have an advantage against cavalry but are weak against regular infantry. (I don't know if this is historically accurate. )
When I see that a province has 20 heavy infantry, for example, I really don't have any idea what it takes to defeat them.
I'd appreciate any help. Thanks.
|
January 31st, 2004, 11:38 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Unit matchups
Morningstars have an advantage agaist shields, in a sense that they ignore the defense (and maybe prot, I don't know about that one) that comes from a shield. Also, ethereal units can be hurt as if they were nonethereal with magic weapons. Some wepons do x2 or x3 damage to undead/demons/magic beings. Other than that, if you mean regular units, no.
|
January 31st, 2004, 11:43 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: twilight zone
Posts: 2,247
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Unit matchups
Quote:
Originally posted by moro:
Hi, I'm sure this is a really dumb question, but I've looked around and haven't been able to find the answer.
Do units and / or weapons have inherent advantages against another? (Aside from weapon range and how it applies to repel attempts.) For instance, in other games I've played, all else being equal, pikemen have an advantage against cavalry but are weak against regular infantry. (I don't know if this is historically accurate. )
When I see that a province has 20 heavy infantry, for example, I really don't have any idea what it takes to defeat them.
|
Not a dumb question at all.
I have not seen an inherent advantage in something like pike vs. cavalry. (It may be there, but I've not seen it.) The pike's advantage lay in that it was longer than the lance, so could reach the horseman (or his horse) before the lancer could strike. The pikeman would set the pike into the ground so that the earth, and not him, received the shock of impact when the pike hit the mass of the charging rider/horse. In Dom 2, it seems that the pike's only advantage is that it's longer. There does not appear to be the added bonus that a grounded pike would have vs. charging cavalry.
Some weapons do have advantages. Flails and morningstars ignore shield defenses, for example. This makes them better against things like HI, than swords or spears. Spears get the repel, but the high protection of the HI renders its weak damage fairly moot. Swords do more damage than flails/morningstars, but that damage has to be able to get past protection, hence the flail/morningstar's advantage.
If you have units with giant strength, then weaker but longer weapons become more useful because they can do enough damage to actually be effective on repel. Which is why I prefer spear-armed giants to axe-armed ones.
The best ways to counter HI are (IMO): magic, giants, lancers, your own HI, pikeman, and crossbows. In that order. (I don't claim this is the only way, incidently, just my prefernce.)
|
February 1st, 2004, 12:36 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Unit matchups
Unless specified, I don't think there is any hardcoded benefit for a weapon or weapon type against particular enemies.
AFAIK, only the properties of the weapons matter (ie : damage, attack, defense, range, and misc. specials like morningstar's shield bypassing ability, poison ...).
Unless I am mistaken, pikes are useful against charging cavalry, because you can repel the lance attack (pikes and long spears are longer), but that's it.
|
February 1st, 2004, 02:18 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Unit matchups
Quote:
Originally posted by Arryn:
The best ways to counter HI are (IMO): magic, giants, lancers, your own HI, pikeman, and crossbows. In that order. (I don't claim this is the only way, incidently, just my prefernce.)
|
Undead are good too - they don't fatigue, and HI do.
|
February 1st, 2004, 02:30 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 96
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Unit matchups
Quote:
If you have units with giant strength, then weaker but longer weapons become more useful because they can do enough damage to actually be effective on repel. Which is why I prefer spear-armed giants to axe-armed ones.
|
IIRC this is wrong. Repel if succesfull deals 1 point of damage regardless of the strength of the guy carrying the weapon.
Edit: The main strenght of repel is that if succesfull it forces a morale check to see if the attacker actually carries through his attack or if he is intimidated by the longer weapon.
[ February 01, 2004, 00:31: Message edited by: Bossemanden ]
__________________
EU2 1.08beta, HOI 1.06/CORE 0.81, Vicky 1.03 (and Beta), Dominions II 2.11
|
February 1st, 2004, 02:47 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: twilight zone
Posts: 2,247
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Unit matchups
Quote:
Originally posted by Bossemanden:
IIRC this is wrong. Repel if succesfull deals 1 point of damage regardless of the strength of the guy carrying the weapon.
Edit: The main strenght of repel is that if succesfull it forces a morale check to see if the attacker actually carries through his attack or if he is intimidated by the longer weapon.
|
Incorrect on the automatic 1 damage.
Step 1: The defender (with longer weapon) must overcome the attacker's defense rating. If successful, move on to step #2.
Step 2: Attacker must check morale. If successful, move on to step #3.
Step 3: Defender hits attacker. Resolve as normal, except that damage is capped at 1. It is possible to do no damage at all. (This is where strength does matter.)
Step 4. Attacker hits defender. Resolve normally.
Please note that if the defender has extras such as poison, decay, etc. that the attacker can be killed by a repel that does "only" 1 point.
[ February 01, 2004, 00:51: Message edited by: Arryn ]
|
February 1st, 2004, 10:24 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Unit matchups
Overall flails seem like the best weapon to use.
Aside from that though, the 'best' weapon seems to be very dependent on the unit you are facing.
olaf
|
February 1st, 2004, 10:27 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 500km from Ulm
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Unit matchups
Quote:
Originally posted by Arryn:
Please note that if the defender has extras such as poison, decay, etc. that the attacker can be killed by a repel that does "only" 1 point.
|
Shure about that?
I'm still waiting for a definite statement from the devs about it, or alternativly some "proofed statement" from a player, 'cause I haven't seen any poisoning from a repel so far.
[ February 01, 2004, 08:28: Message edited by: Arralen ]
__________________
As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
|
February 1st, 2004, 10:47 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 883
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Unit matchups
There is a one point dmg max from successful repell attempts, but this is not a regular attack (code-wise) and would probably not use any specials of a weapon such as poison or fire, perhaps even magic (vs ethereals). Not sure though.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|