Seasonal Change, and scale limits

[Saber Cherry]

Aside from some spells and heat scales, it appears that trees change color with the seasons... possibly! You decide:

http://www.shrapnelgames.com/Illwint..._jotunheim.jpg

I kind of think that all the scales should be changed to +-4, with nations still limited to choosing +-3. That way, a +3 cold nation would be +3 cold in Spring and Fall, +2 cold in summer, and +4 cold in winter. Otherwise, the nation will not get colder in the winter, which is very strange. Also, if random events or spells temporarily change a scale of a province, the effect will be felt even if the nation has the scale at the normal max or min...

It's not very realistic, for example, for a hypothetical "Cause Massive Laziness" spell to have no effect on a province, just because the people are naturally +3 sloth. They should go to +4

-Cherry

[Saber Cherry]

By the way, this thread isn't locked or anything, so you're allowed to comment if you so choose.

[Nerfix]

Originally posted by Saber Cherry:
By the way, this thread isn't locked or anything, so you're allowed to comment if you so choose.

"Silence of the thread", eh?


Nothing wrong with your idead, but i am fine with the current system.

[Saber Cherry]

I reread my original message and found it confusing. So allow me to clarify:

The nation design screen would be identical. Each scale would be specified from +3 to -3.

In the actual game, a province's scale could range from +4 to -4.

Thus, random events, seasons, or spells that tip scales would still effect a province that was under a dominion with maximal scale. For example, let's say Abyssia's nation design had +3 heat, and a strong dominion such that their home province was at +3 heat. Currently (in Dominions I) if a special event happened... for example, the hypothetical "Heat Wave", which normally increases the heat scale in the affected province... Abyssia would be unaffected, because their province's scale is already maxed. Which is unrealistic - "Wow, the ground just caught on fire, but it doesn't feel any hotter. Oh, yeah, this nation has a +3 heat scale, so it can't get any hotter, even when the ground is on fire. That's a relief!"

On the other hand, if a maximum of +4 or -4 were used for actual provincial scales, but +3 or -3 for nation design scales, a province in a +3 or -3 dominion could still be pushed over the normal maximum by special events. And with +-4 scales, invading Jotunheim in winter (when I assume it is normally +1 cold compared to normal) would be a bad idea, whereas if the scales max at +-3, winter in Jotunheim would be the same as fall and spring...

-Cherry

[st.patrik]

I guess I had always seen cold +3 provinces as places where it's always winter - places where it's about as cold as can be - all the time. I guess it might make sense for such a place to be a *little* bit warmer in summer, but pretty much as cold as it gets the rest of the year.

So your idea isn't bad - but I don't think seasonal change is enough of a factor to change the scales. Think about really really cold places on earth, where maybe it gets a bit warmer during the summer months, but not significantly so - pretty much its just always cold. Similarly with very hot places - seasonal variation is nowhere near as pronounced as in temperate regions.

[Saber Cherry]

Originally posted by st.patrik:
Think about really really cold places on earth, where maybe it gets a bit warmer during the summer months, but not significantly so - pretty much its just always cold. Similarly with very hot places - seasonal variation is nowhere near as pronounced as in temperate regions.

Um. Like Antarctica? It is cold there in the summer, but planes can land and people can go outside. In the winter, all travel is ceased, people stay inside their little reseach compound, and virtually all of the scientists leave. The pack-ice forms (ocean water actually freezes). Antarctica in the summer is completely different than in winter... the closer you get to the poles, the greater the seasonal variance is.

This is true in hot places too. There's a city in Siberia that gets up to 90F in the summer and -90F in the winter. And deserts like California's Death Valley are very hot in the summer - usually the hottest place in the US, often over 120F - and cold in the winter. Death Valley's records are 134F in July and 15F in January, while the average daily high and low for those months are 115F and 39F.

So, I hate to say it... but you're absolutely wrong, in this case. Seasonal variation is weak at the equator, which is mostly warm and often humid (I've lived at the equator for a couple years). The main equatorial seasonal variance seems to be rainfall (monsoon or non-monsoon). But places that are very hot or very cold almost universally have extreme seasonal temperature variations.

-Cherry

P.S. Death Valley weather: http://wrgis.wr.usgs.gov/docs/usgsnps/deva/weather.html

[ October 21, 2003, 21:13: Message edited by: Saber Cherry ]

[Mortifer]

Sorta OT but...I was in the Death Valley when I was in the US for a few weeks. Its a hella hot place, the wind is so hot like the air what is coming out from a hair dryer.
There is salt on the ground [not everywhere of course]. I guess it was a part of the ocean millions of years ago.

PS. If you ever go to LA or Las Vegas, you must visit the Death Valley, its a fantastic place..you have a feeling that you are walking on an other planet.

[ October 21, 2003, 22:44: Message edited by: Mortifer ]

[st.patrik]

Originally posted by Saber Cherry:

quote:

---

Originally posted by st.patrik:
Think about really really cold places on earth, where maybe it gets a bit warmer during the summer months, but not significantly so - pretty much its just always cold. Similarly with very hot places - seasonal variation is nowhere near as pronounced as in temperate regions.

Um. Like Antarctica? It is cold there in the summer, but planes can land and people can go outside. In the winter, all travel is ceased, people stay inside their little reseach compound, and virtually all of the scientists leave. The pack-ice forms (ocean water actually freezes). Antarctica in the summer is completely different than in winter... the closer you get to the poles, the greater the seasonal variance is.

This is true in hot places too. There's a city in Siberia that gets up to 90F in the summer and -90F in the winter. And deserts like California's Death Valley are very hot in the summer - usually the hottest place in the US, often over 120F - and cold in the winter. Death Valley's records are 134F in July and 15F in January, while the average daily high and low for those months are 115F and 39F.

So, I hate to say it... but you're absolutely wrong, in this case. Seasonal variation is weak at the equator, which is mostly warm and often humid (I've lived at the equator for a couple years). The main equatorial seasonal variance seems to be rainfall (monsoon or non-monsoon). But places that are very hot or very cold almost universally have extreme seasonal temperature variations.

-Cherry

P.S. Death Valley weather: http://wrgis.wr.usgs.gov/docs/usgsnps/deva/weather.html

---

I was thinking about the poles with cold, yes, and my point was not that there is no difference between summer and winter, but that summer is a warmer blip on an otherwise cold year - i.e. there's not a pronounced difference between autumn and winter, or winter and spring. Now I'll be the first to admit I've never lived inside the arctic circle , so if you, or anyone else for that matter, has any hard info on temperature change between, say october and february, I'm willing to be corrected. However, my impression from what I've heard is that if you get far enough north (or I suppose south) it's mostly just cold.

As far as warm places go, I was thinking primarily equatorial, where, as you point out, the seasonal variation is mainly between dry and rainy season. You're totally right that some places get very hot during part of the year and very cold during other parts. In fact I've personally experienced this, growing up in Ireland (which doesn't vary much in temperature), and at the moment living in midwest USA (where it varies much more!). Maybe IW should introduce a new temperature option, that gives you double points - that of extremes both ways, depending on the season

[st.patrik]

Originally posted by Saber Cherry:
the closer you get to the poles, the greater the seasonal variance is.

I forgot to respond to this: are you sure about this? it seems to me more like somewhere around the tropics of cancer and capricorn is where the most noticeable seasonal variations are.

[Saber Cherry]

At the poles, winter is night and summer is day. Seasons are caused by a difference in the length of day in the winter versus summer due to axial tilt. Poles have 24 hour days in the summer and 0 hour days in the winter, so their seasons are the most extreme... while the equator has daylength differences that are very small (maybe 11:30 in the summer/winter and 12:00 in the spring/fall). Deserts tend to not have plants, rain, or nearby bodies of water to moderate their climate, so they get big swings too - even from day to night. Here's the raw data:

http://www.coolantarctica.com/Antarc...le_mcmurdo.htm

Looks like a 30C (54F) swing in average daily temp from midsummer to midwinter. I'd say that's noticable

As for the difference being larger at the tropics of cancer and capricorn... maybe. The poles get so little sunlight that their highs never get very high, and their lows are limited by things like the freezing point of carbon dioxide and sea ice. So, while the seasons are not as extreme away from the poles (where the day and night are each 6 months long), the fact that there is more sunlight away from them allows greater highs, with similar lows during midwinter... yielding greater temperature variance potential.

[ October 22, 2003, 01:25: Message edited by: Saber Cherry ]