|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
If you google the authors of this article, for instance, it turns out that they are pretty conservative - so I could dismiss them as being slanted. So . . . I'm not sure what info from the news sources are suspect. Did Powell present fake evidence at the UN? He did! - If so what else is fake? Was the US one of the main suppliers of arms to Iraq in the eighties? Yes it was. Has Cheney given big post war contracts to his buddies at Haliburton? Yes he has. Did members of the Bush administration want to go to war before 9/11? Yes they did. BTW - There is this presupposition that the inspections aren't working - but the inspectors - who are supposed to be experts in this stuff - say they are. I trust the inspectors more than I trust W - especially now. (where's the resolution he promised to present?) Are you claiming that Blix is secretly working for Saddam? |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
As to the expertise of the inspectors, I would challenge their credentials in any court of law. They are not anywhere near the best people that could have been found and their leader was picked because of his manageability. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
I seem to get the feeling that anti-war means pro-sadam. It is not.
The pro-war side against Iraq has yet to proove a solid reason to attack Iraq. Every Iraqi Weapon of mass Destruction claimed by the US and Britan has thus far turned out , when inspected by the UN to be clean. The Cia and MI-6 claim they know Iraq is still hiding nerve gas. If so why not give these locations to the UN inspectors ? The germ making trucks " Winnebagos of Death" have turned out to be mobile food testing labs. The "Drones of Death" turned out to be model airplanes. General Hussein Kamel states that he personally supervised the destruction of Iraq's Nerve gas in 1991. Other experts state that their germ and gas weapons would have now deteriorated through age into inertness. The 150 km range al-samound missles may have exceeded their range by 10 to 15 km. So what. And their being destroyed. Unable to link Iraq to Osama bin Ladan the bush/blair shift gears. Now it is about liberation. WHy not in the 80's when these worst crimes were committed. Now the CIA Iraq desk chief has posted the question that the Halabja gassing of the Kurds may have been accidentally caused by Iran. I have yet to see any proof of a reason to go to war with Iraq. As one fact is prooven as a lie the propaganda machine pumps out two more. Their has not been one arguement presented that gives a single reason why this war must occur. All I see is that we have to rely on faith of the USA/Britan Gov't. Lets hope thier is not another gulf of Tonkin or Iraq build up on Saudi boarders, no doubt their will be. Perhaps 1 or 2 weeks into the war some WMD will be discovered. Funny in another thread faith is underattack, as it is here. To me it looks like a re-election winnable war. It has been done many times before in history. Dr. Hasan El-Attar states that "Those for war are quick to label those who oppose the war as Pro-Saddam. I am a dissident to the regime of saddam who left iraq in 1975. I oppose this war against the suffering Iraqi people while at the same time I look for the real punishement for the butcher of Baghdad." I do as well. I look for punishement against the butcher of Baghdad. Not, the butchering of Baghdad. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
I must say that many people are in ignorance of the carnage the U.S. has handed the country of Iraq.
It is estimated that 500,000 Iraqis will die from our "shock and awe" campaign. That's right, a cool half MILLION people in a little over a week! All in the name of getting those biologicals that the U.S. GAVE to Iraq...I've seen the CDC info that documents the transfers. It names West Niles, Bubonic Plague, Anthrax, and Smallpox. They were given to Saddam back when the U.S. was backing him during that Iraq/Iran war. If you search publications like Wall Street Journal, you will find articles from the 1980's stating what a stand-up guy Saddam is....our "Man Of The Year" for Christ's sake. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Wanna see what we are bombing Iraq with today?
http://globalsecurity.org/military/o...art-of-war.htm |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Hmm....
___________________________________ The Sunday Mail March 16, 2003 Iraqi Tyrant Prepared To Unleash Hell In-Depth Coverage By Steve Mckenzie SADDAM could deliberately provoke a nuclear attack on Baghdad in a doomsday scenario being scrutinised by US generals. They fear the Iraqi tyrant could launch chemical weapons at Israel to spark a terrifying retaliation on his own people. Thousands of Iraqis would die, but Saddam reckons the world would be appalled and demand an immediate cease-fire. British and US troops would also be targeted with al-Samoud missiles armed with chemical warheads. American military analyst John Pike said: "A nuclear attack against Baghdad would outrage world opinion. International and public pressure would be so great it would stop the war. "Saddam, of course, would be tucked away somewhere safe and nowhere near downtown Baghdad." America threatened to attack Iraq with a nuclear bomb if it used chemical weapons in the 1991 Gulf War. Pike said: "The Gulf War was an excellent example of how weapons of mass destruction work as a deterrent. "But this time the deterrent has already failed. The US are not deterred from attacking Iraq by what residual chemical and biological weapons it has." He added: "Saddam will use these weapons because he has nothing to lose." Pike, who heads security think tank Globalsecurity, warns that Saddam will launch a strike similar to Vietnam's Tet Offensive - but with weapons of mass destruction. The Tet offensive was a massive surprise attack in 1968,when 80,000 North Vietnamese and Viet Cong troops struck at towns across South Vietnam. Pike said: "Saddam will launch chemical attacks the moment he thinks the war will start. "He will strike at Kuwait with al-Samoud and fire Scuds on Israel. "Saddam will try to inflict large casualties on American and British troops in the style of the Tet Offensive. "I think America is gambling that Iraq's weapons are ineffectual and that the regular soldiers will stay in their garrisons and Republican Guard put up a fight for a few days." Experts say Saddam will resort to medieval tactics and use the environment against the hi- tech weaponry of America and Britain. Refugees who have fled Baghdad claim large ditches filled with oil have been dug around the city. They will be set alight to throw up a curtain of flames and thick black smoke. Land around the Tigris and Euphrates rivers could be flooded to bog down tanks. The tactic was used during the eight-year Iran-Iraq war and saw hundreds of Iranians trapped and killed. If he doesn't succeed in getting Baghdad nuked, Saddam is set to turn the city into a bloody battleground. Pike said: "Baghdad would become Grozny or Stalingrad - pick any urban warfare nightmare of modern times." Saddam, who uses body doubles, may have already fled Baghdad to go into hiding Pike said: "We don't know where he is. Maybe we will be hunting him like we are bin Laden. "But Saddam is also prepared to die rather than surrender because he thinks it will make him a leader who died in victory." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright � 2003, Scottish Daily Record & Sunday Mail Ltd. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar." -- Julius Caesar
People can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. Tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism. -HERMAN GOERING War is also a good way to win an election [ March 16, 2003, 19:53: Message edited by: rextorres ] |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
"I will give money to your family if you strap dynamite to your body and blow up innocent people." -- Sadaam Hussain
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
I've been reading with some interest this thread, because I believe on hearing other people's opinions, or better, actively LISTEN before voicing my own views.
With my country active envolvement today at the 3+1 Azores Summit, against the majority of Portuguese desire for peace, I believe the time is ripe to have a contribution to your discussion. FACTS: Saddam Hussein is a dictator, in control of 24% of the world oil reserves. His regime had weapons of mass destruction, and actively procured more, before the Gulf War. His regime is responsible for crimes against Humanity, namely gassing entire civilian populations. DOUBTS: Iraq may or may not possess weapons of mass destruction, though it is questionable if Iraq could deploy them beyond its close neighbours. Iraq has never been known to host terrorist Groups (like Kadafi's Lybia did), though this is arguable. Iraqi people have been suffering from their regime, though the propaganda states otherwise. Will this war against Iraq benefit anyone? CERTAINTIES: The world economy will suffer from an armed action against Saddam's regime, prolonging the economic crisis affecting the global economy. The Iraqi people will suffer (and die) from the impending war. Many citizens from the US, UK, and possibly UN forces, plus Spanish and Portuguese will die or be targeted. EVALUATION: Do I believe the world will be better after the war due next week? Not really. Sure, we'll rid ourselves of Saddam (unless he is as good a mover as Bin Laden), but what about China, North Korea, Israel, etc? Will also the Western countries like the US, UK, France, Russia, etc. dump their weapons of mass destruction? Will the next move against institutionalized terrorist regimes strike Israel, North Korea, and Lybia, to name but 3 will follow swiftly? Not likely. CONCLUSION: if you are religious, pray; if not, have hope that the Saddams, Bushes, etc. will never get to power in the future, because were all pawns in a game we cannot control. Whatever your beliefs are, let's all hope this dark period ends quickly, and Humanity learns to respect each other's life,( though I'm cynic about it). Thank you all for your attention, and please reflect on the consequences of the actions the people we vote for Power next time you vote (if you're allowed to do it). |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
For all those out there that are opposed to a war and are anti-Saddam I have one simple question. What do you propose to do about Saddam Hussein and his regime?
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Damn I had a nice answer all written out...
David G that is a hard question to answer. One noone here can answer. The standard responces will be special ops, assination etc... But one should not put in writing that they hope one man kills another. So I am going to pass on this question as it is too hard to answer But I ask you a question in return What is the Democracy that will be brought to Iraq ? Since this is why the west is going to war right http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif Surely not Kurdistan out of this ( I think they will be the future terrorists.... ) Surely not the majority ruling Iraq. Since their religous believes are too close to the ruling party in Iran. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
If the US is going to enforce the “Pax Americana”, be sure to apply the same treatment to the leaders of other countries that disregard human rights and kill thousands of their own people. Here are some countries from the top of my head which leaders deserve the same treatment as Saddam. North Korea China Indonesia Myanmar Israel Palestina Libya Sudan Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Colombia |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
Still, most of them welcome the war but they are aswell afraid of what the consequences might be. As I've stated before; Before the war no one knows for sure what the outcome will be. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
But this must be a made up quote. Saddam Hussein does not see any Isreali as innocent, quite the opposite. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
If the US is going to enforce the “Pax Americana”, be sure to apply the same treatment to the leaders of other countries that disregard human rights and kill thousands of their own people. Here are some countries from the top of my head which leaders deserve the same treatment as Saddam. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I agree 100% (although not completely with the list) but In my opintion this is a reason to encourage action against those other contries not to avoid taking action against Iraq. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
You are not believing all that stupid anti-Israeli propaganda, aren't you? Its funny how the only democracy in the middle east gets targetted by the west. Talk about double standards. I guess they can't forgive the existance of a jewish state. The Europeans love to see the jews as defenseless victims, but when the jews start kicking some *** in selfdefense........ Israel had nukes for the Last 30 years, can anyone tell how many times they have been used? None. Do you know why? Because Israel only uses its nukes as a deterrance to conventional warfare. If Israel didn't had nukes it would have been invaded and destroyed already. Just look at all the Arab media says about Israel, and how they discriminate Israelis for being jews!!! . |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Aloofi:
I recognize Israel’s right to defend themselves against outside aggressors. I put them on the list because some of their leaders (probably) are war criminals. Until Sharon is tried by an unbiased court regarding his role in the 1982 Sabra and Shatila massacre, Israel will be high on my list. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
[ March 17, 2003, 14:49: Message edited by: dogscoff ] |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
This is from the Jerusalem Post "Mourning the Death of Peace Alyssa A. Lappen February 23, 2001 I am a Jew. I am a poet. I am heartbroken. Next to God and Jerusalem, the thing most central to Judaism is peace. But my people's fervent prayers for peace - embodied for millennia in every Jewish prayer - every one - again go begging, when they seemed at Last so close to fruition. We find our homeland unwittingly immersed in another war, the sixth in Israel's short life. The United Nations years ago equated Zionism with the basest human emotion. Yet my most beloved friend, also a poet, was an Arab. Chris Khattar gave me priceless encouragement to renew the poetic voice I had lost for 15 years. Before he died of Hodgkin's in 1992, I gave him a poem. I am also fortunate to count among my neighbors, colleagues, fellow-poets, like-minded parents and friends, other Muslims and Arabs, Christians, African Americans, East Indians, Native Americans, Hispanics, Chine Japanese, and people who are disabled, sightless, gay - anyone, in short, open to mutual respect and willing to bless me with kindness, intelligence, wisdom. By this Jewish precept - respect - I strive to conduct all my affairs. Last spring I felt great pride in learning that my first chapbook, The People Bear Witness, would soon appear in a journal published by Catholic theologians along with work by a Palestinian poet. Honored to be in his company, I wrote him an email, kindly forwarded by our editor. I was heartened by his praise for my work, but disappointed by his failure to return my salutations - in Hebrew and Arabic - of peace. I had high hopes for the Camp David II talks then in progress; he signed note only, "Cheers." Months later as violence erupted, I extended a hand again - a small gesture I nevertheless felt necessary: Jewish theology requires small acts of goodness. These in turn can save lives - and each life is considered as an entire world. His reply pained me: On the one hand, he accepted my sincerity. On the other, he questioned it: "The Jews demand, rightly, apologies and compensation from those who wronged them. These are not part of Israel's negotiating discourse. That is why, to tell you the truth, I find your signature at the end (Shalom, Salaam) too casual." For every gain his people might make, he said, "we will pay a terrible price." I wrote our editor, "When even poets cannot talk, we have a problem in Jerusalem." I had no idea yet how big. A great deal more death and pain followed. I reconsidered the poet's reply. Towns, cities, a whole culture died with six million Jewish Holocaust victims. German and world debts incurred cannot be counted, much less paid. How unjust to compare a people - murdered throughout history simply for being Jews 1 - with one that intended in 1948 to conduct another genocide. In 1947, Arab League Secretary General Azzam Pasha prom "a war of extermination," "a momentous massacre" to be remembered "like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades." 2 Jerusalem Mufti Hajj Amin al-Husseini - who had spent World War II in Nazi Germany and was indicted for war crimes by Yugoslavia, though never prosecuted - declared a holy war. "Murder the Jews, murder them all," he cried. 3 Under Oslo, Israel negotiated in good faith to exchange recognition of a new Palestinian state for peace--despite the fact that Arabs already have 22 nations, including the de facto Palestinian state of Jordan, and 5.25 million square miles, roughly half again as large as the U.S. That is another reason I found the allegation--"Jews are not willing to pay"--offensive. Israel's offer of peace at Camp David II was so generous that most world leaders warmly congratulated Ehud Barak at the UN conference in September. How quickly memories fade. Barak's largesse afterwards grew--expanding under fire to include sovereignty over the most-cherished Jewish holy site--the Temple Mount. Several Israeli ministers resigned in protest and Barak's government collapsed. Still, bombers and gunmen took Israeli lives--adding to more than 3,500 Arab attacks on Israelis, averaging more than 30 a day since September and more than 438 murders of Israelis since the Oslo accords were signed. Arab terrorism and intransigence alone account for Ariel Sharon's landslide victory on February 6. Contrary to press reports, even Sharon supports peace: He served as a key negotiator at the 1979 Camp David Peace Accords with Egypt and as Defense Minister in 1982, dismantled two Israeli settlements - the first in Israel's history, against a backdrop of sharp criticism. Sharon supported peace with Jordan and negotiated increased water transfers to her. In 1998, Sharon was Israel's chief negotiator at Wye River. The result was the transfer, to full Palestinian Authority control, of 13 percent of Israeli controlled territories in Area C and 14.2 percent of joint Israeli and Arab lands in Area B. Shortly thereafter, Israel offered accelerated timetables to conclude negotiations within nine months. Then as now, the Palestinian Authority rejected the plan. In historical context, Israel has done little except give and pay. To understand how much, let us retreat into history. In the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th centuries, a litany of Christian travelers - Siebald Rieter and Johann Tucker, Arnold Van Harff and Father Michael Nuad, Martin Kabatnik and Felix Fabri, Count Constantine Francois Volney and Alphonse de Lamartine, Mark Twain and Sir George Gawler, Sir George Adam Smith and Edward Robinson - found Palestine virtually empty, except for Jewish communities in Jerusalem, Safed, Shechem, Hebron, Gaza, Ramleh, Acre, Sidon, Tyre, Haifa, Irsuf, Caesarea, and El Arish, and throughout Galilee towns - Kfar Alma, Ein Zeitim, Biria, Pekiin, Kfar Hanania, Kfar Kana and Kfar Yassif. They cannot all have been wrong. To stay, these Jews had submitted to innumerable conquerors, taxes, pogroms and degradation. But they stayed. But by 1799, Palestine was still so much in need of people that Napoleon Bonaparte championed a full-scale return of Jews. 4 By the mid-19th century, up to 100,000 people lived in Palestine, including a high percentage of Jews, whose forebears had lived there for thousands of years. In 1882, roughly 200,000 Muslims lived in all of Western Palestine. 5 By 1918, the situation had not changed much: That was why Hussein ibn-Ali, Sherif of Mecca, and his son, King Faisal of Iraq, both endorsed and extolled the Balfour Declaration. 6 Hussein wrote in Mecca's Al Qibla, in 1918, "The resources of the country are still virgin soil and will be developed by the Jewish immigrants. One of the most amazing things until recent times was that the Palestinian used to leave his country, wandering over the high seas in every direction. His native soil could not retain a hold on him.... At the same time, we have seen the Jews from foreign countries streaming to Palestine from Russia, Germany, Austria, Spain, and America. The cause of causes could not escape those who had a gift of deeper insight. They knew that the country was for its original sons [abna'ihi-l-asliyin], for all their differences, a sacred and beloved homeland. The return of these exiles [jaliya] to their homeland will prove materially and spiritually an experimental school for their brethren who are with them in the fields, factories, trades and all things connected to the land." 7 In early 1919, King Faisal, then the only recognized Arab leader in the world, executed a treaty with Chaim Weizmann adopting the understanding of the Balfour Declaration. It outlined relations between Palestine and the Arab state, recognizing the former as a National Home for the Jews, in which they should quickly settle. He wrote, "We Arabs, especially the educated among us, look with the deepest sympathy on the Zionist movement. Our delegation here in Paris is fully acquainted with the proposals submitted yesterday to the Zionist organization to the Peace Conference, and we regard them as moderate and proper." (emphasis added) 8 The 1919 Faisal-Weizmann treaty provided a firm foundation for League of Nations ratification of the Balfour Declaration at the San Remo Conference in 1920. The proposals covered Palestine - from the Mediterranean through the entire Galilee, up to the Litany River, hundreds of miles east of the Jordan River through all of current day Jordan, and into part of the Sinai. The League assigned Palestine Mandate administration to Britain, entrusting it to establish the National Home for the Jews Jewish state. 9 Instead, the British grossly corrupted the Mandate's enforcement, planting the seeds of the current conflict. By 1923, they had illegally and unilaterally lopped off the territory east of the Jordan River--75% of the original Palestine Mandate--as a new kingdom for Emir Abdullah. They tore the northern Galilee from Palestine and gave it to the French as part of Lebanon. The northern slice of the Sinai, which remained under British administration, they gave to Egypt. The Jewish people neither protested nor fought this whittling away of 75% of their Homeland. The Jews did not even raise arms when the British began in the 1920s to limit the Jewish immigration encouraged by the League of Nations Mandate, or when Britain instead allowed illegal Arab immigration from neighboring lands to benefit from the economic development of the Jewish communities. 11 What new land the Jewish people acquired, they bought - often in deserts or swamps. Hadera, for example, was the worst malaria-ridden swamp in Palestine when Jewish pioneers arrived from the coastal plain in 1891 - buying land at full price. 12 The British largely ignored their Mandate obligation to sell Ottoman state land to Zionists. This provided absentee Arab landlords a lucrative monopoly. Some 64% of Zionist land purchases through 1946 were from Syrians, Lebanese, Palestine Arabs or Egyptians - like the clan of Mufti al-Husseini, Yasser Arafat's uncle - who had bought it from Turkish sultans for a song. In 1944, Jews were paying $1,100 an acre for untilled land. Iowa farms then sold for less than $110 per acre. Another 27% of their land, Zionists bought from Arab farmers. 13 In 1921, the British appointed Jerusalem Mufti al-Husseini, who was already inciting hatred of Jews. A series of riots culminated in the 1929 massacre of 67 Jewish students in Hebron - and the expulsion of Jews from a town they had inhabited for 400 years. Husseini's vitriol ignited more anti-Jewish riots in 1936. Britain then turned League of Nations policy on its head. Its 1939 White Paper unilaterally cut Jewish immigration to Mandatory Palestine to a trickle - condemning six million Jew Nazi Europe to death. 14 The false idea that Palestine Arab farmers had been displaced, first adopted in anti-Jewish propaganda in 1909, took on a life of its own. 15 "In fact, every square inch of land acquired from Arabs was paid for," writes Samuel Katz. This included settlements at Kfar Darom and Gush Etzion, bought from Arabs in 1930. When Arab attackers won them in 1948, Jews there - like the 100,000 in Jerusalem - were murdered and expelled. 16 In 1947, 70% of Israel's land came directly to the new government, as transferred former Ottoman government holdings from the British Mandate. None had ever been privately owned. 17 Jewish history has been one of paying, and paying, and paying--in cash, in land, in blood. My poetic colleague forgets, along with the rest of the world, that the 1947 United Nations partition plan provided for two states--one Jewish and one Arab. But Israel's Arab neighbors begrudged her even the little that was left of the original Palestine Mandate. Rather than accept a tiny Jewish state to live peacefully alongside yet another Arab one, seven Arab nations attacked the fledgling Israel in 1947. That war, in which Britain encouraged and joined Israel's Arab foes, took 6,000 Israeli lives--more than 1% of her population--equal to half, proportionately, of the devastating 620,000 U.S. losses in the Civil War, and three times the 400,000 U.S. losses of World War II. I come back again and again to the history that brought us to this painful place, of which recent reports have been so devoid. As a woman with 25 years of experience on world class journals I find Middle East coverage Kafkaesque. Far from adhering to minimum standards of objectivity, reporters feed the flames of war. They almost ubiquitously refer to the West Bank and Gaza as "occupied territory," obliterating in those words many critical facts: First, they were part of the original Palestine Mandate. Second, UN Resolution 242 recognizes Israel's pre-1967 borders as indefensible thanks to a four-nation attack on her. Third, Jewish settlements were reestablished on land Jews had purchased, from which tens of thousands were illegally expelled in 1948. Fourth, the Palestinian Authority already governs 99% of the Arab population there. Fifth, the PA would soon govern 95% of West Bank land had it accepted a settlement. Sixth, previous Egyptian and Jordanian occupations were illegal under international law but earned no approbation. Seventh, Arab occupiers failed to establish the new Arab state the UN called for. Eighth, Israel was ready to cede huge areas to parties which have not demonstrated willingness to be peaceful. The press swallowed whole the claim that Sharon's Temple Mount visit provoked the conflict. Nevermind that Arabs began exploding bombs at Netzarim junction on Sun. Sept. 24--five days before. Or that David Biri, who died the day before, was an Israeli. (So was Ethiopian-born Yossi Tabaji, killed point blank by his Palestinian Authority patrol partner.) Nevermind that Sharon was investigating the Wafq' s removal and dumping of priceless artifacts from Judaism's holiest site--including a large stone fragment from the Triple Gate jamb dating to the Second Temple. While the PA had assured Sharon there would be no problem, at the Mount he was verbally assaulted by three Arab Knesset members, who egged rioters on. In fact, Arabs planned the riots - having earlier carted in rocks to hurl on Jewish worshipers below. Tanzim and uprising leader Marwan Barghouti admitted to The New Yorker (Jan. 29), "The explosion would have happened anyway. It was necessary in order to protect Palestinian rights. But Sharon provided a good excuse. He is a hated man." News reports let the error stand - and repeat it endlessly. More than 3,500 attacks on Israelis, averaging more than 30 a day and 350 attacks on Jews and synagogues worldwide since September, orchestrated by Muslims, have attracted little notice. Dozens of Israelis have been murdered by lynchings, sniper fire, ambushes, bombs and acts of war since September--and more than 438 Israeli citizens have been killed since the Oslo accords of 1993, at least a quarter more than Arabs have lost since September. Yet press sympathy for Israeli victims pales when compared with that Arabs, who are dying only because they fight. Columnists recognizing Arab aggression - like George Will, William Safire, Jeff Jacoby and Joseph Farah - are exceptions. Most reporters, though, effectively bless the war on Israel and Jews as an understandable result of "frustration." In its failure to examine a long history of Arab wars against Israel, 18 Arab claims - or even current evidence - the press promotes propaganda, making aggressors of victims, victims of aggressors. A recent column in Harper's, for example, reprinted from an Internet zine, makes the unsubstantiated claim that Israelis in 1948 marched Arabs out of their towns at gunpoint. No names, dates or specifics are cited. Readers are supposed to accept the assertion on its face. But in a fabulously well-documented book, Fabricating Israeli History, University of London Professor Efraim Karsh exposes such claims as largely baseless, malevolent alterations of fact. 19 Arab aggression created this tragic situation. Arab leaders long ago acknowledged that refugees' flight in 1948 was not the result of brutal Israeli policy, but of their leaders' own war and encouragement to leave - rather than recognize Israel. Emile Ghoury, an Arab commander and Palestine High Committee secretary, in 1948 told the Beirut Daily Telegraph, "The fact that there are these refugees is the direct consequence of the actions of the Arab states, in opposing partition and the Jewish State. The Arab States agreed to this policy unanimously, and they must share in the solution of the problem." (emphasis added) In 1948, acting committee chairman Jamal Husseini told the UN, "The Arabs did not want to submit to a truce.... They rather preferred to abandon their homes, their belongings, and everything they possessed in the world and leave the town. And this they in fact did." 20 Similarly, British General Glubb Pasha, who built the Transjordanian army, wrote in an August, 1948 London Daily Mail, "The Arab civilians panicked and fled ignominiously. Villages were frequently abandoned before they were threatened by the progress of war." Even a victim of the Deir Yassin massacre noted in 1948 in Al Urdun, "The Arab exodus from other villages were not caused by actual battle, but by the exaggerated description spread by Arab leaders t to fight the Jews." 21 British Palestine police in April, 1948 reported, "Every effort is being made by the Jews to persuade the Arab populace to stay and carry on with their normal lives, to get their shops and businesses open, and to be assured that their lives and interests will be safe." 22 Mass Arab flight from cities like Haifa began before the UN Partition and snowballed when fighting began. 23 Many Arab, UN and British sources sound the same themes: Refugees left to make way for invading Arab armies, which lost the war. Next, the number of refugees was wildly inflated, as the United Nations admits. Reporters routinely refer to "millions" of refugees. But in 1947, British figures show, only 561,000 Arabs lived in the part of Palestine that became Israel. After the war, 140,000 remained. No more than 420,000 Arabs can have fled Israel in 1948. Emile Ghoury then put the actual number at 200,000. 24 The inflation is akin to that -city welfare rolls in the 1970s and 1980s. Welfare reform curbed the latter. But the UN has no incentive to curb either its own employment, or the number receiving its largesse. 25 Certainly some refugees still live in camps in Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza. A large number also claim such status simply because it pays. Refugees are universally considered persons displaced from permanent residence by war. But in 1948, the UN recognized as refugees Arabs who lived in Palestine for only two years. Why? Before 1948, hundreds of thousands of Arabs from Iraq, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and even Morocco, migrated illegally into Palestine, unchecked by British police, who meanwhile blocked Jewish immigration into the land mandated to Jews by the League of Nations, with King Faisal's blessing. These illegal immigrants largely make up the people now ubiquitously called Palestinians. 26 Arafat himself is from Egypt. 27 Which brings us to the "right of return." Every Arab nation rejected UN Resolution 194, passed in 1948 to assist Arab refugees, because it excluded an automatic right of return. The resolution suggests that refugees may return - or obtain compensation - provided they accept Israel's right to exist and live in peace. This also covered 850,000 Jews expelled from Arab lands, leaving homes, businesses, land worth $30 billion, a point virtually everyone now ignores. 28 In any case, most Palestinians still fail to meet the UN criteria for return: More than 75% of those recently polled support armed conflict against Israel's "occupation" - meaning all of Israel - some, even by children. 29 The latter defies at least six UN resolutions condemning military exploitation of children. Most disturbing is the failure to object to state-sponsored Arab hatred of Jews. Arab religious, political and military leaders tell the West they want peace, but in Arabic call for Israel's destruction and wholesale murder of Jews. A Nov. 17 program broadcast by Al-Jazeera, the Qatar-based Arabic news channel, for example, hosted a debate on the future of the Intifada. PA Minister of Information Yasser Abd Rabbo, Deputy Hamas political bureau chief Musa Abu Marzuq and London- analyst Bilal Al-Hassan all argued for Israel's destruction, through war or negotiation (translated by MEMRI). Weekly sermons broadcast by the PA (also translated by MEMRI) show the bloody intentions of Palestinian clerics - ideological heirs to Arafat's uncle, Mufti al-Husseini - calling the faithful to "kill" Jews "where ever you find them," to cleanse Palestine of Jewish "infidels." Palestinian "experts" declare the Holocaust a lie. Palestinian textbooks teach that Jews are base - and it is good to die killing them. Their maps show only Palestine in Israel' place. 30 The equal of this can be found nowhere in Jewish theology or Israeli government policy. In fact, Israel outlaws political parties espousing hate. 31 Such mass hatred of Jews, rivaling that of Hitler's Germany, cannot be ascribed to deprivation, or even oppression. It existed long before Israel was established. 32 It is a common albeit unfortunate theme on Arab websites. An Internet search for The Protocols of Zion, for example, provides more than 5,000 hits, many at Muslim sites which promote it as gospel truth. 33 As Hitler proved, hate greases war. Arab calls for violence now mirror incitements of 1948, when Arab leaders hoped to soon wash Israel "into the sea." For true justice, the world must recognize this hate and warmongering - and pray for it to stop. As to oppression, Jews can speak with some authority. Deprived for centuries, ostracized, impoverished, forced to live in ghettos, expelled wholesale from numerous countries, murdered in the name of religion, murdered with no excuse, denied rights to vote, work, own businesses or land, Jews never spoke venomously against another people, or raised a hand of war. Not even now. Arabs have no right to do so, either. The tragic situation of Arabs still living in refugee camps, 53 years after their first war on Israel, must be addressed. But as Commander Ghoury said in 1948, "The Arab states agreed on this policy [of denying Israel] unanimously and they must share in the solution." I would like my voice to be part of a solution. I would like to offer a hand of friendship to my Arab colleague and have it warmly accepted. I am like all Israel in this. Each life is a whole world, and too many worlds have already been extinguished. We mourn for the deaths of others as our own. 34 We mourn the death of peace. Mourning, however, does not permit us to let our own light be extinguished. Israel, the Jewish state, is our home. Only when her Arab neighbors accept our state, can there be a just peace. Eliyahu (Elias) Sasson, the Damascus-born head of the Arab section of the Jewish Agency said it well, when in 1947 he begged Abd al-Rahman Azzam, then Secretary-General of the Arab League to say yes to peace: "You and us stand today at the crossroads of history. It depends on you whether you are going to hamper our path or accept us as we ask to be accepted, as sons of the East.... Our work of reconstruction will proceed whether our neighbors wish it or not, but it depends on them what part our new Commonwealth will take in the revival of the Middle East. The choice is theirs. Let me end by quoting a passage from our Holy Bible. 'I have set before thee life and death, blessing and cursing: se life, that both thou and thy seed may live'." 35 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alyssa A. Lappen worked on staff for 25 years for such publications as The New Haven Register, Forbes, Corporate Finance, Working Woman and Institutional Investor. Her poetry has appeared in more than 20 print and Internet literary journals, including International Poetry Review, Sow's Ear Poetry Review, Ruah, Blueline, Heart Quarterly, Out of Line, Touched by Adoption, ForPoetry.com, KotaPress.com, New Works Review, Kudzu and Neovictorian/Cochlea. Copyright 2001 - Alyssa A. Lappen -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] The worst examples of oppression, aside from the Holocaust itself, were the Crusades, the Spanish inquisition, Czarist and Stalin's terrors, and the forced Arab expulsion of 850,000 Jews from Muslim lands. However, through history Jews have been the target of malicious rumors and even theology. [2] Collins, Larry and Lapierre, Dominique, O Jerusalem, p. 400. [3] The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust; Collins & Lapierre, O Jerusalem, p. 400. [4] Katz, Samuel, Battleground: Fact and Fantasy in Palestine, pp. 90-115. Katz, an Israeli historian, makes wide use of Arab sources, as well as news reports of the day. This broad sourcing, from the Arabs, UN, British and other non-Israeli sources, makes his work particularly useful. [5] Katz, Battleground, pp. 90-115 (citing De Haas, Jacob, History of Palestine: The Last Two Thousand Years, New York: Macmillan, 1934), 123-127; Peters, Joan, From Time Immemorial, pp. 244-245, citing Dr. Carl Herman Voss, The Palestine Problem Today, Israel and Its Neighbors (Boston: Beacon Press, 1953), p. 13. Western Palestine (also then called Southern Syria) was considerably larger than the area that later became Israel. It is very misleading to cite their populations interchangeably, as Peters details. [6] Katz, Samuel, Battlegound: Fact and Fantasy in Palestine, 123-127. [7] Katz, Battleground, pp. 125-127 [8] Katz, Battleground, pp.125-127 [9] Katz, Battleground, pp.125-127 [10] Katz, Battleground, pp. 51-69, ; From Time Immemorial, pp. 341-343. [11] Katz, pp. Battleground, 51-69; Peters, Joan, From Time Immemorial, pp. 225-332. [12] Honig, Sarah, "For the Love of Hadera," Jerusalem Post, Dec. 8, 2000. [13] Sources; Aumann, Moshe, Land Ownership in Palestine, Government of Palestine Survey of Palestine, 1946, cited in Katz, pp. 231-232; Peters, Joan, From Time Immemorial, PP 200-359. Yasser Arafat's lineage: Shaykh Abdul Hadi Palazzi, co-Chairman, Root and Branch Assoc. [14] Peters, Joan, From Time Immemorial, pp. 333-350; Katz, Samuel, Battleground, pp.72-78; Encyclopedia of the Holocaust [15] Peters, From Time Immemorial, pp. 201-215. Later on, during British Mandate rule, a 1937 call for Arab claims of land dispossession produced 664 applications, and those proved displaced were given lands by the government, or the "declined the land offered on the grounds that they were accustomed neither to the climate of the new area nor to irrigated cultivation." p. 302 [16] Sources: a) Honig, Sarah, "For the Love of Hadera," Jerusalem Post, December 1, 2000; b) Aumann, Moshe, Land Ownership in Palestine; Government of Palestine Survey of Palestine, 1946, cited in Katz, pp. 231-232; c) Collins and Lapierre, Oh Jerusalem; d) Peters, Joan, From Time Immemorial, pp. 323-324. [17] Sources: Aumann, Moshe, Land Ownership in Palestine; Government of Palestine Survey of Palestine, 1946, cited in Katz, pp. 231-232; Peters, Joan, From Time Immemorial, pp. 200-359; Committee for Accuracy in the Middle East Reporting in America. [18] Seven Arab nations attacked Israel in 1947; Egypt against Israel in 1956, four nations attacked her in 1967, Egypt attacked in the 1970 War of Attrition; two attacked in 1973; and there was a prolonged Arab assault from Lebanon in 1982. Arab nations - even those at peace with Israel - routinely refer to Israel as the aggressor; but Israel has not once initiated war on another state. Even the 1982 invasion of Lebanon was to defend against ceaseless Arab bombardments of northern Israel by Katyusha rockets. [19] Harper's, "Readings", December, 2000; Karsh, Efraim, Fabricating Israeli History, Frank Cass, 2000; other sources include From Time Immemorial, by former newswoman and peace negotiator Joan Peters and Samuel Katz' Battleground: Shapira, Anita, "The Past is Not a Foreign Country," New Republic, Nov. 29, 1999; Teveth, Shabtai, "The Palestine Arab Refugee Problem and Its Origins," Middle Eastern Studies, April, 1990. [20] Katz, Battleground, pp. 15-20 [21] Katz, Battleground, pp. 18-19; see also Collins and Lapierre, Oh Jerusalem, pp. 274-281. The incident began with a battle in which virtually every Arab male carried a firearm. Although Jewish fighters insisted that the killing of scores was the result of Arab opposition, atrocities did occur. But the vast majority of Palestine's Jewish community condemned them as a violation of Jewish and Zionist ideals. Jerusalem Arab High Committee member Hazam Nusseibi later recalled that using the news of the events to shock Arab governments proved a "fatal error," which stirred panic and flight. [22] Katz, Battleground, pp. 18-19 [23] Karsh, Efraim, Fabricating Israeli History: The New Historians, Frank Cass, 2000, p 24 [24] Katz, Battleground, pp. 20-22 [25] Katz, Battleground, pp. 23-28; United Nations; Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America. [26] Peters, From Time Immemorial, pp 1-10, 137-171, 196-340; Katz, Battleground, pp. 231-233, citing Palestine Royal Commission. [27] Peters, Joan, From Time Immemorial, pp. 401-402, citing Thomas Kiernan, Yassir Arafat; Shaykh Abdul Hadi Palazzi, co-Chairman, Root and Branch Assoc. [28] Jerusalem Post, January 3, 2000 [29] United Nations; Bir Zeit University Poll as reported in Jerusalem Post, Nov. 14, 2000; Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America. [30] see: www.memri.org; www.edume.org; www.pmw.org.il. [31] New York Times, Jan 1, 2001 [32] Peters, Joan, From Time Immemorial, pp. 33-79; Katz, Samuel, Battleground, pp. 70-75 [33] www.alltheweb.com; The Protocols of Zion, also known as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, according to the Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, purports to be prove a plot of Jewish leaders to take over the world. It was circulated in Russia in 1905 by a Czarist secret policeman, in Germany in the 1920s and 1930s by Hitler's henchmen and in the Soviet Union by Stalin. Apparently forged in 1894 by the head of the foreign branch of the Russian secret police, it was taken from two 19th century sources - a satire by Maurice Joly, Dialogues in Hell, and the 1868 novel, Biarritz, by Hermann Goedsche (aka Sir John Retcliffe). It now circulates widely again - in the Arab Middle East, and in the US, where Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Borders are selling in volume over the Internet. [34] Many Jewish congregations now say Kaddish, the Hebrew prayer of mourning, for both our own and Arab dead. It is a blessing of God, of life and of peace, thereby renewing our fervent hopes for peace. [35] Sasson, Eliyahu, as cited in Karsh, Efraim, Fabricating Israeli History, pp 75-77. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Aloofi
It’s a nicely written piece, and nobody here denies the fact that the Jewish people have suffered (and still suffers) great injustice. That does however not justify all the things the state of Israel does (and have done). |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Aloofi - Nowhere in your article does it address Amnesty International's accusations of oppression, brutality and torture made against the israeli government. No matter what Israel and the Jewish people have suffered throughout history, they will never have the right to do what they are now doing. Furthermore, they will never bring about peace by antagonising the Palestinians in this way.
Read the second article I linked to, and then tell me that it's all (a) untrue or (b) justified. you would need to produce some pretty hefty evidence to bring me round to (a), and I will never accept (b). Finally, I want to acknowledge that the majority of israelis want peace and liberty for the palestinians. It is only a minority committing these crimes against humanity. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Anesty international?
They use as a source what the Palestinian tells them. Far too many times I've seen them telling outright lies . They forget that all those camps are the source of attacks on Israeli civilian population. just answer this question: Why are still refuge camps in there? They are all under the PA control, they ARE in Palestine, so what's the motive to keep them up? They are training camps. Period. They train their operatives there, surrounded by civilians as both the source of recruits and a human shield. Remember the Second Battle Of Jenin? A "refugee camp", britsling with terrorist, and then the western media clamied that there was a "massacre" there. When the "Massacre Theory" was proven wrong not even one newspaper or TV channel reported an apology, they left the "massacre" in the mind of their readers..... Tell me this, when was the Last time a western army went to battle without artillery or air bombardment as ground preparation? In Jenin the IDF went in on clean, like a WWI infantry charge without artillery support, paying with Israeli blood so the "media" wouldn't blame the IDF of firing on civilians that offer themselves willingly as a human shield and many times they are nothing more than terrorists posing as civilians. But of course, the first thing the Palestinians did, as always, was to claim that massacre was ocurring, and the western media dutyfully reported this, as always, as true without investigating. Answer me this, when was the Last time you saw an Israeli family mourning their losses on your TV? How about never!? When was the Last time you saw a Palestinian family doing this? Do you need a calculator? |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Aloofi:
Once again in this thread I am made speechless. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif There is obviously not possible to have a rational discussion here, so I withdraw from this thread until its back on topic. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
If you're not going to produce any evidence to deny what I've posted, then I'm going to leave this discussion again. All I'll say is this: I hope God is proud of his peoples, because I'm not. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
This is slightly off topic (actually, more on the original topic http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif ), but related. Has anyone else heard about Hussein putting parts of his Republican Guard in US uniforms and others in civilian clothes? This is almost sure to inflate the early estimates of "friendly fire" and civilian casualties.
In other news, it looks like it's time to hold on and wait out the ride. Maybe tomorrow it all starts? We can only pray it will be over quickly. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
..here's my 2 cents..
"Peace is not an 'Act' or a 'state of being', Peace is what's left when you remove hatred, violence, persicution, and yes even racism." "Before people can live in peace they must first learn to live without hate, to live without violence, to live without racism, and to live without fear." It is a hard lesson to learn, and one I feel people will never fully learn. Hate is most often born of jealousy, violence is most often born of 'the desire to control', racism is born of ignorance, and fear is the basis of most modern day economies. Don't wish your enemy dead, wish him a long life, it's a much crueler fate! someone once said.."I know the truth and even if I shout it at the top of my lungs, nobody will hear it. Why? Because to hear the truth you have to be willing to listen!" ..the end! |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
Another often heard reason is that the only reason we are going after Iraq is the oil. The flip side of the coin is that Saddam is the most dangerous because he is sitting on top of several billion (or trillion??) dollars worth of oil. I think it would be great if there were a way to get rid of Saddamn and his regime without a war. I just don't know what it is. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
I said I was leaving this discussion, but we seemed to have changed the subject, so...
Quote:
[ March 17, 2003, 16:56: Message edited by: dogscoff ] |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
[quote]Originally posted by dogscoff:
Quote:
What ever I post you will say its biased, from an Israeli source, and doesn't count. I've seen this trick before. Besides, you will always believe what you want to believe. When 850 000 jews were expelled from Arabs countries and all their properties confiscated nobody said a word, when the Jordanian and Egyptian govertments begun building settlements in the areas of Israel that they conquered during the 1948 war and kept under their control until 1967 nobody said a word. Nobody cared when the Jewish community in Gaza was massacred and expelled, and their houses occupied by Arabs. Nobody said one word when the Egyptian govertment ordered the UN troops in Sinai out so they could invade Israel, oh no, the whole world called it "Israeli agression". And when Northern Israel was bombed back to the stone age in 1982, with entire Kibbutzim being leveled and Israel invaded Libanum to kick them out of range it was called "Israeli aggression", and the whole world came together like one to vote a zillion UN resolutions against Israel. So you know what? Fck the world! I don't give a sht what anybody believe. Israel is there, and its a military power, and that's why everybody hate it. They want jews as victims, not as independent and sovereign human beings. And about the proud thingy you said, is pointless to reply, but you already know what I think. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Please tell me what attocities has Suddam commited since GW1.
a link to read http://praeter.org:8080/iraq_timeline_letter.pdf another http://thomasash.hypermart.net/curre...trocities.html http://www.counterpunch.org/du.html Please tell me why this is a proper war to fight. Its like I wish for Mayor Mel Lastman to be removed from power in Toronto so I flatten Toronto. 40000 people die... and maybe Mel is among them. Maybe not. If the US want a regime change why not a surgical strike. One can only hope that with this order of Democracy their is super sized freedom fries with it. Also what additional rights will the USA people have to give up in the coming days, weeks, years... to win the war in the middle east , far east and those other places inbetween, near and far away. I quote that bastard laden "freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people - and the West in general - into an unbearable hell and a choking life." P.S. Sorry for the swear word. but thats what i feel their and i feel it is happening. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
So. GloboCop George Bush and his Lords of Chaos say they want to attack Iraq because someday, maybe, Iraq might possibly attack us. But wait--aren't Dick Cheney and Colin Powell the same knuckleheads who fumbled the Last war against Iraq? Didn't they (along with George Bush I) tell us twelve years ago that the half a million soldiers we had poised in the desert south of Baghdad couldn't be allowed to finish off the dictator Saddam Hussein because keeping Saddam's regime in power was vital to the preservation of Iraq's territorial integrity and regional stability? And now they want to start the whole bloody mess up again? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Saddam goes to bed tonight and has a dream, first thing in the morning, he calls Bush.
�George, this is Saddam. Last night I had a dream and I think it might have been a vision. I was in Washington, and everywhere I looked there were signs praising Iraq�s great leader, Saddam! They were praising me. What do you think of that? Bush replied that the call had awakened him from a dream. �I was in Baghdad and everywhere I looked there were signs.� Saddam excitedly asked what the signs said, and Bush replied. �I couldn�t tell, they were all written in Hebrew.� http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif [ March 17, 2003, 23:31: Message edited by: Thermodyne ] |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Good one Thermo.
This discussion needs more smileys. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon7.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/blush.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon10.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/tongue.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon6.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/rolleyes.gif |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
By Rush Limbaugh (WAIT!!! it is still worth reading)
I think the vast differences in compensation between the victims of the September 11th casualty, and those who die serving the country in uniform, are profound. No one is really talking about it either because you just don't criticize anything having to do with September 11th. Well, I just can't let the numbers pass by because it says something really disturbing about the entitlement mentality of this country. If you lost a family member in the September 11th attack, you're going to get an average of $1,185,000. The range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000, all the way up to $4.7 million. If you are a surviving family member of an American soldier killed in action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half of which is taxable. Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse, you get $833 a month until you remarry. And there's a payment of $211 per month for each child under 18. When the child hits 18, those payments come to a screeching halt. Keep in mind that some of the people that are getting an average of $1.185 million up to $4.7 million are complaining that it's not enough. We also learned over the weekend that some of the victims from the Oklahoma City bombing have started an organization asking for the same deal that the September 11th families are getting. In addition to that, some of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for compensation as well. You see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and parcel of over fifty years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just really sad. Every time when a pay raise comes up for the military they usually receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the Middle East while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in low rent housing. However our own U.S. Congress just voted themselves a raise, and many of you don't know that they only have to be in Congress one-time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month and most are now equal to be millionaires plus. They also do not receive Social Security on retirement because they didn't have to pay into the system. If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7 you may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed you in harms way receive a pension of $15,000 per month. I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and daughters who are now fighting. "When do we finally do something about this ??" If this doesn't seem fair to you, it is time to forward this to as many people as you can. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Don't you realize how hazardous it is to be a US Senator? You can get booed! People could stop liking you, and call you bad names if you don't do what they want you to do. There is so much psychological trauma, that ex-Senators need tons of money so they can live a luxurious lifestyle to counter-act possible losses of reputation. http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/rolleyes.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/rolleyes.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/rolleyes.gif http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/image...s/rolleyes.gif {--- more smileys for ya primitive
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
What's small, white, fluffy, and has a really BAD ATTITUDE?!?!
http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/newup...1047948890.jpg |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Bad attitude! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon9.gif
French/U.S. relations are in the basement. So, it's war. Saddam will never leave! |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
"Akhmed, what time is it? 9 o'clock? Uh, I think I left something in my tent, I'll be right back..." |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
I wonder if the New Orleans city government will change Mardi Gras into Big Freedom Tuesday.
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Well in a few days the French will have to scratch one rich dictator off of their list of economic assets. Gas will cost more in Paris, and there will be a surplus of consumer goods. Consumer 155mm rounds, and consumer radars, consumer Roland�s and consumer heat seekers. But not to worry, as was once said in a popular movie �There is another�. They will just have to dust off the deals they had with Kadafi[sp]. I�m sure he would like to buy a breeder.
As a side note, there was an Israeli on the shuttle when it went down. First Israeli in space. Anyone know what his other 15 minutes of fame were. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
yep and add one rich dictator to america's list in about 2 to 3 weeks...
|
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
Quote:
If the Americans have major successes early in the war, I would think he will be assassinated. Or possibly he will take Hitler's route. |
Re: [OT] Another heated discussion about the Iraq siutation, war and politics.
sorry for being so rude the Last few Posts....
but we all know america can deliver a good war but the question one must ask. can america deliver a good peace. It is the answer to this question that is very important. Right now I would say no. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.