.com.unity Forums

.com.unity Forums (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/index.php)
-   Space Empires: IV & V (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Passive vs. Active Scanners (http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=6437)

WillyNilly June 22nd, 2002 08:17 PM

Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
I'm having trouble figuring out the difference between the Hyper Optics component and the Tachyon Scanner. They both can see cloaked ships at a lower level, but Hyper Optics are "passive" and Tachyon's are "active."

If anyone can help me out I'd appreciate it.

dumbluck June 22nd, 2002 08:20 PM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
There are (IIRC) 5 different types of cloaking/sensors. The default game treats them all the same (ie, level 2 in all 5, instead of level 3 in one type and level 1 in the other 4). There are a couple of mods out there that are splitting cloaking up between all 5 types.

CW June 22nd, 2002 08:45 PM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
Tachyon Scanner is a bit more research-expensive than the rest if I remember correctly, but in the un-modded game they are all the same.

I thought about splitting them in my own mod, but it will make stealthing your ships way too hard given that you need to put in 5 times the research to detection-proof your ship. Did you guys reduce the reserch points and sizes for your stealth devices?

dumbluck June 23rd, 2002 09:08 AM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
"You guys"???? I'm sure SJ will take offence at that!!! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/icons/icon12.gif I didn't have much of anything to do with creating the P&N mod, that was all SJ.

Suicide Junkie June 23rd, 2002 06:03 PM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
"Did you guys reduce the reserch points and sizes for your stealth devices?"

Well, for P&N in particular, I mainly increased the cost of sensor tech.
The stealth devices are also nearly all built into devices that you would already place on ships...

Cloaking is provided by: stealth & scattering armor, Master computers, tachyon diffUsers and hull size.

Tachyon diffUsers and master computers can be ignored if you're not facing a temporal or psychic race, and the remainder (armor and hullsize) are fairly easy to research.

80KT of stealthing on an escort or frigate is enough to get unbeatable cloaking for most races.
However, A frigate with only 120 KT for C&C, engines and a payload is quite weak.
Anything larger can be detected by a level 3, starbase-mounted grav sensor.

This system still needs to be balanced, of course.

Ed Kolis June 23rd, 2002 11:56 PM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
Is this the same P&N that we're playing on "P&N on PBW, take 2"? Grav sensors that detect ships based on their mass seems logical, though... gotta put that in my mod! ;-)

Baron Munchausen June 24th, 2002 12:01 AM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
There should be a different effect of 'active' scanners vs. passive not directly related to scanning. It should be impossible to be cloaked while using 'active' scanners. You're bLasting radiation (radar, lidar, whatever) around in order to 'see' things, right? So how can you be cloaked? Another little tweak, like scanner jammrs working in combat as well as the system screen, that we keep hoping for.

[ June 23, 2002, 23:03: Message edited by: Baron Munchausen ]

Suicide Junkie June 24th, 2002 12:36 AM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
No, its not the same as the currently running PBW game.

I'm hoping to get a Testing Game of the new Version going before I release it.

Cylapse June 24th, 2002 09:04 PM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
Quote:

I'm having trouble figuring out the difference between the Hyper Optics component and the Tachyon Scanner. They both can see cloaked ships at a lower level, but Hyper Optics are "passive" and Tachyon's are "active."
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I've often wondered this too - but this thread turned into a Mod Advertisement so fast I didnt see the question get answered *LMAO*

TerranC June 24th, 2002 11:25 PM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
I'd appreciate the Delete Posts option back again.

[ June 24, 2002, 22:26: Message edited by: TerranC ]

TerranC June 24th, 2002 11:26 PM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
Just an opinion:

Someone should make a mod to make:

Asteroids give protection for Passive
Storms give Protection for Active

Since Passive sonar just sends out a weak ping at all directions: the same principle could be used here and sends out weak pulses of some substance to detect ships without having to do intricate scans; and an asteroid field could give cover for the passive scans as a ship could pose as an asteroid or hide behind an asteroid from the Passive scanner's *Line of Sight*.

Active sonar keeps circling, but focuses on a specific viewpoint, and storms should have the scientific reasons to mess with an active scanner.

I'd do it, but I don't have any modding experience.

Baron Munchausen June 24th, 2002 11:29 PM

Re: Passive vs. Active Scanners
 
Quote:

Originally posted by TerranC:
Just an opinion:

Someone should make a mod to make:

Asteroids give protection for Passive
Storms give Protection for Active

Since Passive sonar just sends out a weak ping at all directions: the same principle could be used here and sends out weak pulses of some substance to detect ships without having to do intricate scans; and an asteroid field could give cover for the passive scans as a ship could pose as an asteroid or hide behind an asteroid from the Passive scanner's *Line of Sight*.

Active sonar keeps circling, but focuses on a specific viewpoint, and storms should have the scientific reasons to mess with an active scanner.

I'd do it, but I don't have any modding experience.

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">There is no specific cloaking type for stellar abilities. It's just ONE ability - 'sight obscuration' - and all scanning types can penetrate it. Also, asteroids given the 'sight obscuration' ability will not hide ships but will be invisible! Argh! I've often pointed out to MM that asteroids are the classic place to hide out in all SciFi but so far no action on this important issue.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.