.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
The Star and the Crescent- Save $9.00

 		   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page Search Results
Register Forum RulesChatAll Albums FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Page 20 of 20 « First 101819 20
Showing results 476 to 500 of 500
Search took 0.01 seconds; generated 103 minute(s) ago. Search: Posts Made By: narwan
Forum: WinSPMBT August 28th, 2005, 01:50 PM
Replies: 12
Views: 4,891
Posted By narwan
Re: what mix of forces do you use in PBEM?

My preferences are for no snipers at all or if the opponent insist on having some, at most 1 per infantry type company.
Also, I prefer no (gunship) helicopters. I personally feel that both snipers...
Forum: TO&Es August 28th, 2005, 01:26 PM
Replies: 7
Views: 2,067
Posted By narwan
Re: Missing french formations

Thanks for the replies but I do have to disagree I'm afraid. Now off course my information could be wrong but according to those the available formations don't cover everything. And by everything I...
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project August 28th, 2005, 12:09 PM
Replies: 6
Views: 10,148
Posted By narwan
Re: Playtesting comments (third-party scenarios)

Don't worry, I don't 'fix' things myself. I know very well that I know not nearly enough about the game to just go fiddling along by myself without making a mess!

Remco
Forum: TO&Es August 28th, 2005, 11:57 AM
Replies: 71
Views: 16,513
Posted By narwan
Re: obat44 - West Germany

Hi Andy,

I agree completely with you. I did and do consider the current discussion here one of finding out if and which improvements could or should be made, not concrete suggestions (not yet...
Forum: TO&Es August 27th, 2005, 11:28 AM
Replies: 71
Views: 16,513
Posted By narwan
Re: obat44 - West Germany

Actually, two out of the twelve HS brigades were at near full strength in peacetime and under operational control of the field army (one heavy brigade attached to the gebirgsdivision for example)....
Forum: TO&Es August 25th, 2005, 07:03 PM
Replies: 71
Views: 16,513
Posted By narwan
Re: obat44 - West Germany

There are no specific 'Heimatschutzen (HS)' cie's in the game. It looks like the game does cover the tank cie's though since the M48 remains available when it was only in service with the HS...
Forum: TO&Es August 25th, 2005, 05:49 PM
Replies: 71
Views: 16,513
Posted By narwan
Re: obat44 - West Germany

Alpha, thanks for the info. I haven't checked out your alternative obat (yet). It's one of many things on my mental 'to do' list! http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

DesertFox,...
Forum: TO&Es August 25th, 2005, 12:16 PM
Replies: 7
Views: 2,067
Posted By narwan
Missing french formations

The french obat misses many Foreign Legion formations. Besides the independent (mot) infantry cie's, the legion also is represented in the regular armed forces. The 2REI (Regiment etranger...
Forum: TO&Es August 25th, 2005, 11:49 AM
Replies: 71
Views: 16,513
Posted By narwan
Re: obat44 - West Germany

One error spotted:
Grenadier units 216, 217 and 218 have 6 HEAT ammo (at PEN 0) for their G3 rifles.

An OOB question:
Why are german regular rangers (unit 423) 19 points per squad (8/89) and the...
Forum: WinSPMBT August 22nd, 2005, 04:42 PM
Replies: 12
Views: 4,864
Posted By narwan
Re: reverse slope defence

Have you checked out the different warhead types? HEAT type warheads are excellent for longer ranges because their penetration value drops much less (if any at all...) at increased ranges, unlike AP...
Forum: TO&Es August 4th, 2005, 02:11 PM
Replies: 6
Views: 2,395
Posted By narwan
Re: Austria OOB part 1

Except for the 'recce company' all of the ones you mentioned are absent from the OOB and I'm familiar with none of them.

The Sicherungs and Landwehr formations are especially interesting since in...
Forum: TO&Es August 4th, 2005, 11:35 AM
Replies: 6
Views: 2,395
Posted By narwan
Re: Austria OOB part 1

I'm interested for sure!
Could you give a breakdown of those other formations too?

Thanks,
Narwan
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project August 4th, 2005, 11:24 AM
Replies: 6
Views: 10,148
Posted By narwan
Re: Playtesting comments (third-party scenarios)

Finished the scenario.

Final results were 3157 vs 369 (in favor of the USMC) with all VH's in USMC hands.
I did replay the first 3 turns once (due to crashes) so it wasn't completely a 'virgin...
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project August 4th, 2005, 10:41 AM
Replies: 29
Views: 21,817
Posted By narwan
Re: Trojan found

Hi, sorry for my absence lately. I figured I could keep in touch here during my 'holidays' but as you might have noticed that wasn't really the case.
Should be allright from now on.

Remco
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project July 14th, 2005, 03:20 PM
Replies: 12
Views: 4,915
Posted By narwan
Re: Scenario proposals

Wulfir, I made a thread for questions about scenario design and copied your question there.

Remco
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project July 14th, 2005, 03:15 PM
Replies: 4
Views: 3,156
Posted By narwan
scenario design questions

This thread is for questions about the actual design of scenarios' in WinSPMBT. If you're not sure if something is possible or how it works, this is the place to ask.


This question came up in...
Forum: After Action Reports July 14th, 2005, 12:29 PM
Replies: 12
Views: 9,109
Posted By narwan
Re: Retreat?...No, just redeploying in a tactical way!

I use retreats a lot for another purpose, to misdirect the enemy artillery. As a fencer, I know the value of feints and misdirections in a confrontation!

By making your opponent think you have...
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project July 14th, 2005, 12:16 PM
Replies: 12
Views: 4,915
Posted By narwan
Re: Scenario proposals

Some good ideas there. Looks like we need to get together on this scenario!

I can see merit in both approaches so we'll have to work out which one works best in practice.
Maybe you can work out...
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project July 14th, 2005, 12:05 PM
Replies: 6
Views: 10,148
Posted By narwan
Re: Playtesting comments (third-party scenarios)

Haven't finished the scenarios yet, it keeps chrashing whenever a Panther hits one of the NK tanks with its cannon. Not sure if this is because of the scenario or my set-up.

Some observations...
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project July 14th, 2005, 11:51 AM
Replies: 12
Views: 4,915
Posted By narwan
Re: Scenario proposals

The main reason why I left out transports in my proposal is that they serve other uses besides transporting units and can be easily abused.
By not using these you can greatly simplify the scenario....
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project July 14th, 2005, 11:34 AM
Replies: 1
Views: 3,272
Posted By narwan
Re: Mission schedule - progress tracking

This schedule is to keep track of Theatre's, Chapters and Missions.

Each code can be followed by a (Type) indication to show the desired type of mission (offensive, defensive, patrol, special)....
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project July 14th, 2005, 11:26 AM
Replies: 1
Views: 3,272
Posted By narwan
Mission schedule - progress tracking

T1

T1C1
T1C1S
T1C1P
T1C1B

T1C2
T1C2S
T1C2P
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project July 14th, 2005, 10:34 AM
Replies: 41
Views: 100,877
Posted By narwan
Re: 1st Cav, 1969-71 Operations

Looks good Boonierat!
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project July 14th, 2005, 10:16 AM
Replies: 12
Views: 4,915
Posted By narwan
Re: Scenario proposals

Somewhere someone came with the idea of using a crashed transport helicopter with a 105mm gun as the basis for a mission. Since I had some ideas on how to expand on this I went to look for the...
Forum: Vietnam Campaign Project July 14th, 2005, 09:56 AM
Replies: 12
Views: 4,915
Posted By narwan
Scenario proposals

This thread is for conrete scenario proposals. Not for general mission concepts, these you can post in the mission type threads.

As a concrete scenario proposal some specific parameters for the...
Showing results 476 to 500 of 500
Page 20 of 20 « First 101819 20

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 PM.

Contact Us - Shrapnel Games - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.