View Single Post
  #6  
Old July 9th, 2001, 11:27 AM
PsychoTechFreak's Avatar

PsychoTechFreak PsychoTechFreak is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bordesholm, Germany
Posts: 781
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
PsychoTechFreak is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Finally a full-Version owner... just a few questions

No, what I meant is this: even if you don't need Advanced military science then it is cheaper to research through this tree until HO III. This is a part of another thread which I have started a few weeks ago (with medium research costs):

1) Hyper Optics (255 K of RP):
-BTW you get some tech areas: Combat Support, Torpedo Weapons, PDF Weapons, Weapon Overloading Weapons, Ship Capture, Advanced Military Science
-and some Facilities: Ship + Fleet Training Facilities

2) Psychic Receptors (Racial Trait needed, 350 K of RP):
-Facilities: Psychic Ship/Fleet Training Facilities
-leads to Psychic Scanner Facility (any ship within system can be scanned in detail)

3) Temporal Sensors (Racial Trait needed, 350 K of RP):
-Facilities: Events Predictor Fac.(System Combat Bonus), Temp. Vacation Service (Happiness)
-leads to Temp. Spaceyard Fac.

4) Gravitic Sensors (450K of RP):
- Tech Areas: Stellar Manipulation, Tractor/Repulser Weapons, Stellar Harnessing, Gravitational Weapons, Null-Space Weapons

5) Tachyon Sensors (1100 K of RP):
-Tech Areas: Shields, Sensors, Energy Stream Weapons, Energy Pulse Weapons, Combat Sensors (attack bonus)

I think Tachyon Sensors are WAY too expensive to research, ok you need some of the tech areas of the basic research (e.g. shields), but the 750 K of Research Points at the end just to get Tachyon Sensor III is too much.

Edit: The research points in brackets are all accumulated points that you need to get the level 3 sensor, included Basic research like Military Science,...

You need 750K to research Tachyon I to III, this alone are almost 3 times more points than the complete military/advanced military research tree.

[This message has been edited by PsychoTechFreak (edited 09 July 2001).]
Reply With Quote