Thread: overrated ?
View Single Post
  #3  
Old July 20th, 2005, 06:53 PM
Arralen's Avatar

Arralen Arralen is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 500km from Ulm
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Arralen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: overrated ?

Quote:
PlasmaKrab said:
What for a figure do you exactly use for 12.7 penetration?
Is 20mm a conventional asserted value, and if so, for which ammo type?
12.7mm is rated with PenHE 1 generally in the game ...

Quote:
Besides, front slope is 10mm @80.5°, which makes 60.59mm of virtual steel, plus the bouncing effect, looks fine.
Front upper hull. Lower hull is about 30° ... .
According to eye witnessess, bouncing effects on front attacks must have been high.

Quote:
Now as good as I can recall from the various sources about this thing (pics, models, 3D...), the other plates you mention are at least inclined by some 45°, which gives 19.5mm on the lower front hull and 30mm on front turret, assuming the max armor thickness is on the front.
Inclined? The whole things is pretty much a big, paper-thin box, albeit slightly tapered!

Quote:
Additionally, if you take out 1 armor point you will end up with it being only 7.62mm AP proof, am I right?
And that's what I'm talking about - it is reported to have been penerated by 12.7mm from the side o.c..
So "1" at the side would be the right way to go, with 2-3 for the turret and front.

"Not surprisingly, the PT-76 is very lightly armoured, at no point exceeding 1/2in (14mm), and its side armour can be penetrated by shell fragments and even .50 calibre AP machine-gun rounds. PT-76s used in Vietnam were very vulnerable to air strikes." http://www.gruntonline.com/Order%20o...VN_armour6.htm
__________________
As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
Reply With Quote