[karnoza]

It seems that there is some misunderstanding between Ulm and Ashdod. Has been informed that Ashdod is sending away messages accusing Ulm of "violating a NAP, prior to its expiration".

But below is previous message from Asdod to Ulm which states conditions of breaking a NAP:
_______________________________
I regret to inform you ...

From: chrispedersen

That as of this turn(13) my ally requires me to nullify my nap with you.

I personally think it will all be over by the time the nap expires (hostilities could commence on 17), but I am honor bound to say something.

I propose to revisit the matter with you, then.

Best wishes.

____________________

So, on turn 18 Ulm attacked some Ashdod province by a single scout and this is not NAP violation in anyway.