Quote:
Originally Posted by namad
right now today or tomorrow someone should post a list of every vp
they are ALL WRONG on the map... it's not fair to have victory conditions no one is sure of... someone should compile a list of every capital and every noncapital yet "special" for
many vp's have no forts and many capitals have no vps
|
Yeah, I don't understand that. I fairly meticulously set all the VPs by hand, checking and double checking as I went that they belonged where I wanted them. Here is the list of where I put them in the map commands:
--VPs
#victorypoints 284 1
#victorypoints 182 1
#victorypoints 38 1
#victorypoints 69 1
#victorypoints 173 1
#victorypoints 192 1
#victorypoints 263 1
#victorypoints 311 1
#victorypoints 222 1
#victorypoints 133 1
#victorypoints 199 1
#victorypoints 88 1
#victorypoints 21 1
#victorypoints 47 1
#victorypoints 316 1
#victorypoints 256 1
#victorypoints 241 1
#victorypoints 113 1
#victorypoints 262 1
#victorypoints 102 1
#victorypoints 10 1
#victorypoints 258 1
#victorypoints 244 1
#victorypoints 122 1
#victorypoints 76 1
#victorypoints 245 1
#victorypoints 232 1
#victorypoints 140 1
#victorypoints 200 1
#victorypoints 23 1
#victorypoints 39 1
I have no idea why there would be VPs anywhere else. If someone could explain to me why, and how to prevent this in the future, I promise if there's another overlords game to stamp out this silliness.
Quote:
|
I don't really think that overlords should be able to accept provinces in trade and breach the rules... however maybe the rules should be more lax so that it is easier for them to make attacks?? perhaps god, or prophet, or gatestone (that's 3attacks per turn max all with unique irreplaceable risks?) or maybe just god or gatestone? or maybe just god OR gatestone equipped to prophet....
|
I'm not going to comment on all of people's suggestions right now. This will wait until the game is close to completion. But if there is an Overlords 2, I'm definitely going to look into ways to relax rules on how hard it is for overlords to attack people. Right now it's more than a bit excessive, and forces them to work a lot harder than they should have to.
Quote:
|
or maybe baalz and atul are doing so well that the overlords should just not have picked tein chi or machaka because tein chi and machaka are awful nations? (machaka is awful tein chi is mediocre....)
|
I'm reasonably aware of squirrel's problems, as of a few turns ago. I don't think being TC was necessarily a deal breaker in and of itself, though possibly it caused other nations not to take him quite as seriously as some of the others. But he was really hamstrung by a few of the rules, among other things. If he wants to talk more about this he can, but I don't want to get even close to giving away state secrets. As for machaka, I have no idea what dr p is doing.
Baalz has convinced me that it was a bad, bad, stupid idea to have water overlords :P. I'm pretty sure I'm not going to allow water nations period if we do overlords part 2, but I could maybe be convinced to take a water nation that wasn't an overlord. It is just too hard to balance them for this format, and early on the other water nations are fairly easy prey.
Quote:
|
wasn't pythium supposed to be the overlord instead of tein chi? what happened there? also DRP admitted to everyone he was picking a bad overlord nation to challenge himself intentionally
|
The player for pythium bowed out, iirc, and I don't remember the exact sequence of events but I think squirrel had already picked tc and just took them into the overlord slot when I asked if someone would move up. This was after I decided that it didn't really matter what nations I thought should be overlords, because whoever ended up playing one could probably make a decent run of it as just about any nation (since I was picking mainly from the most experienced players).