|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
    
        | Notices |  
        | 
	Do you own this game?  Write a review  and let others know how you like it.
 |  
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 2nd, 2014, 06:41 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Czech Republic 
						Posts: 50
					 Thanks: 42 
		
			
				Thanked 49 Times in 21 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Zhalanashkol Incident 
 To finish the Soviet/Chinese conflict, here's the last incident that happened during these border clashes.   
	Quote: 
	
		| Zhalanashkol Incident Date: August 13, 1969
 Battle Location: Near Lake Zhalanashkol, Kazakh SSR
 Battle Type: Soviet assault vs PRC defend
 
 Description: The battle takes place near the Soviet-Chinese border, few kilometers deep in the Soviet territory. On morning 13th several PRC infantry squads cross the border, achieve the Kamenaya and Pravaya peaks and start to fortify their positions.
 
 Short argument between the Soviet troops and PRC units doesn't solves anything and border guards leave the scene to wait for reinforcements. After arrival of Soviet BTRs and hard fight, overhelmed PRC troops retreat. One of the key factors that decided the out come of the battle was absence of AT weaponry on
 PRC side, since they didn't anticipated presence of Soviet IFVs in the region.
 
 Notes: If played against the AI the human player should take the Soviet side.
 
 Sources: A. Musalov, Damansky and Zhalanashkol, Moscow 2005.
 |  This is small and short scenario, as the actual incident involved only few units. Should be suitable for reasonable PBEM aswell.
 
Any comments, improvement ideas and so on are more than welcome.   EDIT: Final version is attached.
Changes: - Scenario is bit longer now (30 turns)
 - China tries to reinforce their positions (as it was historically)
 - Mi-4 instead of Mi-2 for Soviets
 - Fixed VPs
 - Some other minor stuff
                 Last edited by Tomas; December 8th, 2014 at 12:25 PM..
 |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Tomas For This Useful Post: |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 3rd, 2014, 08:11 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: I ain't in Kansas anymore, just north of where Dorothy clicked her heels is where you'll find me. 
						Posts: 878
					 Thanks: 584 
		
			
				Thanked 277 Times in 191 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Zhalanashkol Incident 
 Okay, I'll take a look at this one as well and report back promptly. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 4th, 2014, 06:33 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2005 
						Posts: 570
					 Thanks: 2 
		
			
				Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Zhalanashkol Incident 
 Thanks. 
 Btw, how about India/China war/skirmishes 1962 battles?
 |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Warhero For This Useful Post: |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				November 10th, 2014, 08:14 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: I ain't in Kansas anymore, just north of where Dorothy clicked her heels is where you'll find me. 
						Posts: 878
					 Thanks: 584 
		
			
				Thanked 277 Times in 191 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Zhalanashkol Incident 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by shahadi  Okay, I'll take a look at this one as well and report back promptly. |  I found this scenario of excellent scope requiring thoughtful battle planning. The terrain and balance of forces are consequential and required patience. Therefore, I used my vehicles in over watch positions to pound the Chinese mercilessly with suppression fires from multiple vehicles. Moreover, I left the roads immediately after plotting an approach to the Chinese positions that was clear of rough terrain and at an approach that limited the Chinese fire zones.
 
A few suggestions are in order:
 The Force HQ formation leaders on both sides are too high and should be no more than 2nd Lieutenants with a formation appropriate to that rank, say a Guards Platoon or something similar, rather than a battalion.
There were no flag values, I would have liked to have Victory Flag values.
Although, it is not required in our game, I prefer HQ units in my formations of say 3 men for a platoon and more for higher units. 
 
Overall, the scenario an entertaining experience.
			
			
			
			
				  |  
	
		
			| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shahadi For This Useful Post: |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 8th, 2014, 12:26 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Czech Republic 
						Posts: 50
					 Thanks: 42 
		
			
				Thanked 49 Times in 21 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Zhalanashkol Incident 
 Uploaded the fixed version! |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Tomas For This Useful Post: |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |