|
|
|
 |

October 26th, 2003, 03:26 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 858
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Devnull and Retrofitting
This can't be right!
I had some tech research completing in the next couple turns so I designed some ships with spaces left open for these improvements. Specifically, solar sail III, combat sensors III and ECM III.
When these became available I retrofitted to the new design. Now, this is a very simple retrofit: no components to remove, just the three to add. But something about the price to retrofit seemed wrong....
The costs for these components are:
Solar Sail III 400 mins 100 rads
Combat Sensors III 400 mins
ECM III 400 mins
Total 1200 mins 100 rads
Cost to retrofit 840 mins 70 rads !!!!!!
WTF!
So I checked settings.txt
SEIV default:
Retrofit Cost Percent For Comps := 120
Retrofit Cost Percent For Comp Removal := 30
Devnull:
Retrofit Cost Percent For Comps := 70
Retrofit Cost Percent For Comp Removal := 10
Sho' nuf! It is cheaper to retrofit in Devnull than to build from scratch!
Think about what this means. Resources are tight? Why, just retro build your ships; you'll save up to 30%! .... And build more ships faster!
This must be an oversight by the Devnull creators. I defy anyone to give me a rational reason for this oddity.
[ October 26, 2003, 01:38: Message edited by: Grandpa Kim ]
__________________
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, teach.
Those who can't teach, slag.
http://se4-gaming.net/
|

October 26th, 2003, 05:52 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Devnull and Retrofitting
Hmm... that is odd.
|

October 26th, 2003, 05:48 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Devnull and Retrofitting
I guess whoever set that option forgot that when you retrofit, you're not necessarily upgrading a component to a more advanced Version of the same component... hey, think about it, if you have an Anti-Proton Beam III, it should only take installation of a newer model flux capacitor and a higher powered containment magnet to make it functionally equivalent to an Anti-Proton Beam IV, right? You don't have to scrap the whole component!
edit: scrap, huh? even if you did, you normally get 30% back from scrapping... 100% - 30% = 70%... that might explain it!
[ October 26, 2003, 15:49: Message edited by: Ed Kolis ]
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|

October 26th, 2003, 07:24 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 858
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Devnull and Retrofitting
Ed, you make good points... but they are real world points. My concern is with game balance and playability. It now appears the cheapest way to build in Devnull is retro-series, despite the extra costs for more repair ships and bases. Add in the known advantages of retro-series building and standard construction is thrown out the window.
Now, I'm the micro-manager type, but the thought of full time retro series building makes my teeth ache. The majority of players try to minimize micro management and they simply will not do it! That gives a significant advantage to those who will.
For the good of the mod, I would like to see Geoschmo and Rollo change this back to SEIV defaults.
__________________
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, teach.
Those who can't teach, slag.
http://se4-gaming.net/
|

October 28th, 2003, 12:33 PM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kiel, Germany
Posts: 1,896
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Devnull and Retrofitting
hmm, I never knew these values were changed. You are right Grandpa Kim, this makes little sense.
I will raise the values in the next Version of DNM. Not sure about default, though. It seems the intention of the original authors to make retrofit cheaper. So I am likely to follow the spirit of the mod and offer a discount for retrofits as well.
Speaking of retrofits, how about raising the 'Retrofit Max Percent Difference in Cost'?
|

October 28th, 2003, 06:57 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Devnull and Retrofitting
Quote:
Originally posted by Rollo:
I will raise the values in the next Version of DNM. Not sure about default, though. It seems the intention of the original authors to make retrofit cheaper. So I am likely to follow the spirit of the mod and offer a discount for retrofits as well.
Speaking of retrofits, how about raising the 'Retrofit Max Percent Difference in Cost'?
|
If you want to make retrofitting cheaper than stock, but not make a loophole that can be exploited as much, the minimum settings I'd use are these:
Retrofit Cost Percent For Comps: 100
Retrofit Cost Percent For Comp Removal: 0
Retrofit Max Percent Difference in Cost: 50
I wouldn't make the Max Percent Diff larger - you'd lose a big part of the balancing factor (time).
[ October 28, 2003, 16:59: Message edited by: spoon ]
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|