|
|
|
 |

October 5th, 2006, 01:39 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Thoughts on Early Agartha
What do you people think of Early Agartha? I've been playing around with them.
They're very interesting, even though the vulnerability to missile weapons can be rather annoying at times. I've been using a W9/E4 Olm with them.
I can see them being powerful Magma caster but the lack of precision will propably hamper them.
I love making fiery armies with Rhuax Pact though, that spell must be my new fave spell. 
__________________

"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|

October 5th, 2006, 02:07 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Thoughts on Early Agartha
In the irc, some further weaknesses have risen up. They have low attack, defense and precision. I've been arguing that in some cases high strength allows them to deal damage even when a shield parry is succesful, but they don't believe me yet.
Even the smaller Agarthans are size 3, which is a bit of a disadvantage. Everyone seems to agree that Troglodytes are good.
|

October 5th, 2006, 02:12 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Thoughts on Early Agartha
Yeah I noticed that they are rather clumsy. =/ I wonder how some Fire would work for them...hmmmm.
I wonder what is a good research route them.
__________________

"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|

October 5th, 2006, 03:15 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Thoughts on Early Agartha
Just been playing early agartha, taking huge losses. The low protection in early age is a killer, u seem to lose forces at a far faster rate. Had indies on 9. Those boulder throwers looked interesting but I am finding they get involved in melee combat, rather than boulder throwing. The problem is they ony have a range of 6, str 20/3. Need to give them a strengh boost! I am sure they could be made good, when they hit with a boulder they r doing 20+ damage.
Going off topic slightly, played the apemen, excellent ranged weapons (longbows straight away), dirt cheap as well, but no real decent front line troops to defend them. Again the low protection hurts.
|

October 5th, 2006, 03:43 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Thoughts on Early Agartha
Kailasa gets Bandar Warriors with armor though.
__________________

"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|

October 5th, 2006, 03:57 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Thoughts on Early Agartha
Quote:
Nerfix said:
Kailasa gets Bandar Warriors with armor though.
|
Yea, but even those r only 10 or so protection. Playing Dom2 demo 9/10 battles I was only taking 0 - 10 or so losses, even battles I lost I was inflicting 3 times losses on the enemy. Dom 3 early age, taking 4 times the losses, also even with a priest to bolster morale, its a toss of the coin who runs 1st. The low protection is the reason why, any nations who can get high protection on there troops has a significant advantage early on.
Probably just need time to adjust. 
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|