|
|
|
 |

December 6th, 2006, 01:01 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm
Middle era Ulm is a difficult nation to play competitively. It has weak priests and weak mages, and since magics end up dominating the game, it has a hard time surviving. Notice also that it has no sacred troops, so no bless strategies. I have never played MP, but from what I gather (and someone please correct me if I'm wrong), Ulm is in the low end of the scale. I'd like to make three suggestions to improve the situation a little - no big changes intended.
1. Raise the chance of an extra magic pick for the smiths to 50%. Those extra picks are sorely needed but at 10%, even with smiths being relatively cheap (140g) they are hard to come by.
2. An additional *crossbow* unit. Ulm has arbalests which have lower precision - and Ulm units already have low precision to boot. The extra damage (14 vs 10) and extra range (45 vs 35) does not compensate for this. One *could* buy sappers, but it does not pay off: you can buy 2 arbalests for 1 sapper, which means that at the end of 6 rounds, the arbalests have fired 4 arrows while the sapper has fired only 3. So what I suggest is an extra crossbow unit, with a cost around 10g (possibly a *little* higher, like 11-12g), but with lower protection, that is, even less fitted for melee - an Ulm specific version of the independent crossbow unit.
3. This is not an Ulm-specific improvement, but it would help Ulm a lot. The Ulm smiths have a builtin forge bonus and with a dwarven hammer this bonus is even larger. So they are well fitted for a construction strategy: build lots of commanders (e.g. black lords, guardians) and deck them with trinkets. They can then serve as mini-mini-thugs in support of your armies. Of course, this is a micromanagement hell to pull off, so please, please, please, could we have a monthly forge command?
Best regards
|

December 6th, 2006, 05:11 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm
I still say ME Ulm should have national item forges,make them a bit more interesting to say the least. But the final one you ask sounds like something it needs
|

December 6th, 2006, 06:08 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA. USA
Posts: 220
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm
Or a national spell that perhaps evens out the magic differences. A battlefield wide "anti-magic" or somesuch which would make Ulm troops' martial superiority actually useful. The spell could either lower penetration, cause spells to randomly fail (or small chance to overload/kill the enemy mage), raise cost of spells like a mini drain dominion, or something of that type.
I love Ulm and I play them SP all the time. Don't think I'd MP them, but I'm not very good at MP so I'd probably lose with dual blessed Helheim.
|

December 6th, 2006, 06:54 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm
Quote:
Stryke11 said:
Or a national spell that perhaps evens out the magic differences. A battlefield wide "anti-magic" or somesuch which would make Ulm troops' martial superiority actually useful. The spell could either lower penetration, cause spells to randomly fail (or small chance to overload/kill the enemy mage), raise cost of spells like a mini drain dominion, or something of that type.
I love Ulm and I play them SP all the time. Don't think I'd MP them, but I'm not very good at MP so I'd probably lose with dual blessed Helheim.
|
Ulm does have one national battlefield-wide spell. It's called Tempering the Will. It takes an E3 mage (any Master Smith with one of: Earth Boots, Earth Power, gem), doesn't cost any gems, and gives +4 MR to any friendly unit that fails an easy magic resistance roll. Thau 5, though. The chance for spell to have an effect is from 18% (MR 10 (drain dominion) - penetrating bonus of 6 for an easy spell and E3 caster) to 24% (MR 9, or neutral dominion) to 30% (MR 8, Magic dominion). With two-three mages casting the spell, most of your army will get +4 magic resistance.
|

December 7th, 2006, 12:16 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA. USA
Posts: 220
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm
Whoops, sorry. I should have checked that before I posted.
Still think causing an enemy mage's head to explode when they cast a spell (even if only 5% chance or so) would be super cool.
|

December 7th, 2006, 03:06 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 133
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestions to the devs: improving ME Ulm
According to page 86, the penality for penetration with an easy spell is -4, not -6. Also, the caster wins ties, so unless I'm mistaken the MR 10 value is 24%, the MR 9 is 30% and the MR 8 is 38%. Not that it makes a very significant difference. If you have access to any astral, you can forge some penetration items (up to +3 penetration at con 4) for your smiths that would help the process. With both items you'd be up to 46%/54%/62% respectively.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|