|
|
|
 |

February 27th, 2007, 02:50 PM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
10 heavy cavalry vs some troops & mages
That should be simple enough scenario. What tactic would you use for your cavalry to kill some mages? My basic tactic would propably go like this.
6 at front on the side scripted hold and attack rear
2 little further back center scripted attack rear
2 little further back other side scripted attack rear
What do you think? You can do pretty complex tactics with these simple commands so please keep it to topic. And no you don't know anything more than this about the scenario. You absolutely definitely have no further intelligence on this scenario you don't know what troops there are, what mages there are, are you attacking, are they attacking etc.
|

February 27th, 2007, 02:59 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,050
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: 10 heavy cavalry vs some troops & mages
So you have the 10 cavalry? What is "some troops"?
I think would put all 10 in one group to either side with orders to attack rearmost (though they would still probably attack the main enemy troop formation), or if the number of enemies is very low, to the center with no orders. A larger group is less likely to rout.
__________________
Great indebtedness does not make men grateful, but vengeful; and if a little charity is not forgotten, it turns into a gnawing worm.
|

February 27th, 2007, 03:58 PM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: 10 heavy cavalry vs some troops & mages
"self censored"
|

February 27th, 2007, 04:08 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sweden, Ume�
Posts: 991
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: 10 heavy cavalry vs some troops & mages
probably 2 or so in center told to hold attack closest (hoping that these will get the attention of the "some troop", 4 to each side told to hold attack archers (have had better luck taking out commanders/mages with this one).
edit: all 3 groups would be somewhere in the front section
|

February 27th, 2007, 04:16 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: 10 heavy cavalry vs some troops & mages
You use a scout to attack and retreat the expensive heavy cavalry, because it's not exactly a brilliant move to waste ten expensive heavy cavalry unsupported at mages with troops -- given that they may smack into orb lightning, astral fires, magma eruption, nether darts, F9W9 lava warriors, et al. If they're a mix of summon-spammers and attackers, you could lose 'em all for no gain.
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|

February 27th, 2007, 04:24 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sweden, Ume�
Posts: 991
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: 10 heavy cavalry vs some troops & mages
I agree with you Taqwus, still it was not what the poster asked about...
|

February 27th, 2007, 04:39 PM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: 10 heavy cavalry vs some troops & mages
Yes little better. But still not good I think. I have rarely seen attacks from both flanks at the same time succeed. And remember in my tactic those decoys at center have a chance to get through if opponent has deployed all his troops to sides. Has happened. And if someone still deploys his mages in front of or in archer squads I suggest you stop it. Good for their health. I don't know what to say to those opinions about small heavy cavalry squads not being good against mages. Only that in my opinion they are almost THE best strategy against someone who likes to use mages with some troops. If you use those decoys effectively you can almost always draw their fire so those other heavy cavalry troops get close. But if you want to start that discussion please make another thread and know I won't be part of it.
|

February 27th, 2007, 04:49 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 247
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: 10 heavy cavalry vs some troops & mages
In my experience attack rear targets the rearmost unit of regular troops. I have not seen it attack lone mages, although I haven't tried it with such small numbers. Small units can potentially rout very quickly indeed, even with heavy cavalry's good morale. I've recently seen an AI unit of two elite knights (of the chalice IIRC) break without even suffering a casualty. I'd recommend keeping them together in one group. Set as far to the front as possible. Might try to attack rearmost but they'd probably attack the troops - I'd hope they'd break the enemy troops and then run down the mages.
When you say you 'have no idea' what you'll be facing.... unless you're attacking indeps it seems unwise to enter battle with such a small force. An enemy army could easily massively outnumber yours. Against a large force you'll never close with the mages.
|

February 28th, 2007, 02:12 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Nairobi, Kenya
Posts: 901
Thanks: 4
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: 10 heavy cavalry vs some troops & mages
Ah, you are all being too hard on yourselves. Clearly, given the vacuum of information regarding the commander of the heavy cavalry force, this is where the answer is. Put your fully equipped Wraith Lord in charge of the cavalry, then deploy the cavalry as an honor guard…
More seriously, I would add one thing to the discussion. I agree that this is possible, but that it is not a sure thing. I thinking having one or two troops in the center to hold the enemy troops is a good idea. But, the closer the troops running to the back are to enemy, the higher the chance they will turn and attack. As such, I would argue for splitting the cav into two troops of five and putting each of them at the front, at the extreme left and right. Hopefully, the enemy will move en masse to attack one of the two groups, leaving the other a straight run at the mages in the back. It would also increase the distance between the enemy and those running to the back. Often, the troop with the run at the back will turn and attack the main body of troops, but on those occasions they head straight to the mages is nice.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|