|
|
|
|
|
May 19th, 2009, 10:59 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 250
Thanks: 19
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Acashic records vs. separate spells
When playing a nation that gets reliable S3, do you rush Acashic Record, or rely on the separate searching spells?
Has anybody worked out which is actually optimised?
|
May 19th, 2009, 11:10 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 198
Thanks: 87
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Acashic records vs. separate spells
I believe Acashic Record is quite useful in SP, because you can simply build your defence and play the game beyond 100+ turns without feeling pressure.
In MP I always ignore it.
Maybe under the new cost introduced by CBM it deserves respect.
|
May 19th, 2009, 11:10 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,066
Thanks: 109
Thanked 162 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Re: Acashic records vs. separate spells
Akashic Record is much less than optimal, gem-wise. It's quite good in terms of mage time, though.
Separate search spells (or manual searching) are preferred as a rule, because 4xAkashic Record=1xWish later in the game.
Ooh, I missed the new cost in CBM... 20 pearls is definitely better, but still a lot.
|
May 19th, 2009, 12:32 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: Acashic records vs. separate spells
The other consideration to is that AR gives you magic diversity. It allows you to search in paths you otherwise couldn't, which will often yield indie mages with those paths. AR is an important way for ie EA R'yleh to get diversity both in terms of magic paths and in terms of land mages. It can also be quite useful when you have mages who can use the gems but not remotely site search - ie F1 mages who could crank out lightless lanterns. The economics also are quite different if you have, say, a completely unsearched wasteland/swamp with no magic sites showing vs a farmland with a farm of plenty. Not economical if you want to blanket all your provinces and just plan alchemizing random gemtypes, but with a bit of leverage it can be quite useful. All in all, AR is not a default "goto" spell, but there are plenty of cases where it's the spell you want.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
May 19th, 2009, 12:59 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In Ulm und um Ulm herum
Posts: 787
Thanks: 133
Thanked 78 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Acashic records vs. separate spells
Hmm, at 20 gems (unless you're counting pearls as two gems ) I'd say it is feasible on high gem settings.
Remote searching every path = 14 gems, so you pay 6 gems more. If you find a site earlier than with normal site searching it can pay off.
In high settings you are bound to find good indie mages/discount sites that way.
|
May 19th, 2009, 01:09 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 12
Thanked 86 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Acashic records vs. separate spells
I'm still a die-hard manual search fan myself. *shrug*
|
May 19th, 2009, 01:38 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: Acashic records vs. separate spells
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micah
I'm still a die-hard manual search fan myself. *shrug*
|
That's curious, even when you don't have mages well suited for it? I find some nations/strategies lend themselves much more to either manual or remote site searching for specific paths. D1/S1 mages are not very good manual site searchers, but can pop off the remote spells just fine, while some national mages have two strong magic paths and another one or two weak ones and maybe even holy, making great manual site searchers. Water is a bit of a special case because it's an inconvenient research placement unless you were already headed there, and of course you have to consider voice of tiamat and the over representation of W gems from random events. I find the choice varies greatly depending on the circumstances.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
May 19th, 2009, 01:09 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Treviso; Italy
Posts: 420
Thanks: 22
Thanked 19 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Acashic records vs. separate spells
pro
-increase magic diversity
-requires pearl and not specif gem
-requires only 1 mage
con
-high cost
-doesn't work for holy site( not sure here)
-require astral-2 mages
go for it in my opinon,especially if you are an astral nation.
|
May 19th, 2009, 01:57 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 773
Thanks: 2
Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Acashic records vs. separate spells
Akashic Record is a gamble.... much like all site searching. It's stupidly expensive, but when you are looking at a Mountain/Forest province that has been searched by the four paths you can scrape together you know there must be something there. Now, that may be a few supply sites or something even more lame like Arenas, but it can also be something awesome like a site making Wizards.
At the end of the day, you need to choose when the gamble is worth it and when is is not. Some sites produce signs that they are there like unrest, heat, cold, order, turmoil, etc..... and those are places you might want to search.
So use it to search key provinces..... or search when you have provinces that should have sites but don't.
|
May 19th, 2009, 03:00 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Acashic records vs. separate spells
I agree that in MP I rarely use it. The smaller maps puts a rush on you that makes extensive searches of every province a luxury I cant afford.
But there are times I consider it. Besides those mentioned, if a lab randomly pops up in a province where Ive found no magic sites then Im eager to see if there might randomly be a good use of it. It might not be smart use of gems but its far too tempting to quickly see how lucky I might be.
Or if Im about to build a castle in an important strategic location. I particularly love having a search give me a castle there. Sometimes I do acashic on two provinces next to each other where I want to build a castle but cant decide which to build on.
But the size of the game will often decide how many acashics Im willing to do.
Gandalf Parker
--
Due to strong suggestions by the Budget Manager
I am trying very hard to focus my work into areas where I receive compensation.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|