|
|
|
|
|
June 7th, 2010, 05:07 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Official Vanilla vs CBM debate thread
Hey everyone, I am opening this thread because the Noobs and Vets thread keeps getting spammed with CBM vs Vanilla arguments, and personally I think that's a bit silly. Such debates should happen where everyone can see them, and I'm quite sure that not everyone on this forum reads that one, particular sprawling and enormous thread. So you get this one. Now stop cluttering the MP threads with CBM vs Vanilla!
P.S. Try not to flame each other too much about gem gens.
__________________
"Easy-slay(TM) is a whole new way of marketing violence. It cuts down on all the red tape and just butchers people. As a long-time savagery enthusiast myself, I'm very excited about the synergies that the easy-slay(TM) approach brings to the entire enterprise." -Dr DrP
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rdonj For This Useful Post:
|
|
June 7th, 2010, 05:31 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
Re: Official Vanilla vs CBM debate thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdonj
... because the Noobs and Vets thread keeps getting spammed...
|
I think that's just called revenge isn't it?
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Calahan For This Useful Post:
|
|
June 7th, 2010, 03:50 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: Official Vanilla vs CBM debate thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calahan
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdonj
... because the Noobs and Vets thread keeps getting spammed...
|
I think that's just called revenge isn't it?
|
Likely, good sir!
__________________
"Easy-slay(TM) is a whole new way of marketing violence. It cuts down on all the red tape and just butchers people. As a long-time savagery enthusiast myself, I'm very excited about the synergies that the easy-slay(TM) approach brings to the entire enterprise." -Dr DrP
|
June 7th, 2010, 02:24 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Official Vanilla vs CBM debate thread
Vanilla is easier for newbies since there's always a "go to" choice that stands out above other choices. ie. Tarts, clams, Gorgons, etc. CBM is more enjoyable for vets since those "go to" options are nerfed to be more in line with other choices. Over all, unless one enjoys stomping players with the same strategy over and over, there's little reason not to upgrade to CBM once one gets the basics of the game down.
|
June 7th, 2010, 06:23 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Official Vanilla vs CBM debate thread
Gandalf calls it upon himself by making claims that are totally out of line with reality. Seriously: [paraphrase] '[Vanilla] frost fathers are one of the few chasses that can take a triple 9 bless, and have points to spare.' Just blatantly false by inspection.
|
June 8th, 2010, 10:10 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Official Vanilla vs CBM debate thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrelloid
Gandalf calls it upon himself by making claims that are totally out of line with reality. Seriously: [paraphrase] '[Vanilla] frost fathers are one of the few chasses that can take a triple 9 bless, and have points to spare.' Just blatantly false by inspection.
|
Wow. Well trained.
You might mention this was in response to your challenge to find a purpose for the Frost Father in vanilla dom3. It wasnt the rarity I was pointing out, but the use.
|
June 8th, 2010, 11:18 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Official Vanilla vs CBM debate thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf Parker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirrelloid
Gandalf calls it upon himself by making claims that are totally out of line with reality. Seriously: [paraphrase] '[Vanilla] frost fathers are one of the few chasses that can take a triple 9 bless, and have points to spare.' Just blatantly false by inspection.
|
Wow. Well trained.
You might mention this was in response to your challenge to find a purpose for the Frost Father in vanilla dom3. It wasnt the rarity I was pointing out, but the use.
|
Gandalf's Original Quote: "But I meant Frost Father. He is one of the few that can get 3x9 plus some left over (if you want to pay for it). And of the ones that could get there, he had some other features that could be worked to his advantage over the other choices."
From here. Emphasis added by me.
My specific response which addresses the veracity of the claim can be found here.
Note the following:
1) Gandalf claims he is one of the _few_ that can do it. Literally half the pretenders in the game (minimum!) can do it as well or *better*. (See my response for a brief listing)
2) Gandalf claims there is "some left over", i presume points. There are no points left over in any meaningful sense, you need to take 12 net negative scales and be imprisoned to do this, and you only have dom 5 at that point. Note that there's only 6 more scales left to sack, and most people aren't going to ever play worse than T3S3H3D3L3M1, which is only 8 negative scales.
3)Gandalf claims 'other features' that could be 'worked to his advantage'. See my response for disproof of this claim as well - you can do at least as well with titan chasses or better 3x9 bless suites.
Basically, Frost Father may be the worst possible chassis for a 3x9 bless who can do it with *only* imprisoned and -12 net scales or better. I mean, I won't deny some chasses can't do it even at that level of awful. But if you set that as your baseline for acceptable, nothing I've found is *worse* than the frost father. That makes it hard to claim a 3x9 bless as either a purpose or a use for the frost father, since no one is actually going to use him in such a way because he's so bad at it, disproving Gandalf's new claim on face.
|
June 7th, 2010, 06:31 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Me a viking
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 81
Thanked 122 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Official Vanilla vs CBM debate thread
CBM rocks your shorts out of tangent space cakes for real, capische?
Vanilla iz teh suxors wtf noob woot!
Just adding my 2 cents.
__________________
Voice of ***** and her spicy crew!
|
June 8th, 2010, 06:06 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Treviso; Italy
Posts: 420
Thanks: 22
Thanked 19 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Official Vanilla vs CBM debate thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fantomen
CBM rocks your shorts out of tangent space cakes for real, capische?
|
in italian is "capisce".
|
June 7th, 2010, 06:44 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Official Vanilla vs CBM debate thread
Short answer CBM version of the game is miles better than vanilla...
Longer version, newbies should play vanilla until they get bored (probably take a while), then switch to CBM for a whole new game to spice it up.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|