|
|
|
 |
|

September 4th, 2003, 08:05 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 464
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Rating System
Multiplayer game Ratings. Take the first looser and match them to the top winner, calculate rating for those two. Take the second person out and "team" him with the second place winner and caculate them to find a rating adjustment. If there are an odd number of players, the exact middle gets no change in score. This would make all multiplayer games equivalent to single player matches. (I think) It would be possible for the second place player to get more points than the first place player (Like if the first guy eliminated was really low rated, but the next guy out was a high rated player) But this sounds like it could still be fair and in the spirit of chess. What do you all think?
[ September 04, 2003, 19:11: Message edited by: Parasite ]
__________________
I thought of the sun as a big bright ball of something that produced an intense absence of darkness. Alan Dean Foster No More Crystal Tears
A++SeGdy$+-++Fr?C++++Cst+SfAi--Mm-MpTS---SsROPw++Fq++Nd++++RpG++Mm++Bb
|

September 5th, 2003, 01:25 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 809
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Rating System
The problem with this is, no-one would get any Ratings until the entire game is finished.
The first person could be kicked out at turn 20, while the game continues onto 200+ turns. Fine for quick games, but if the turn time is 3-7 days...
|

September 7th, 2003, 01:48 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Rating System
(bump)
Just letting you guys know I'm thinking still.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

September 7th, 2003, 01:53 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Rating System
Quote:
Originally posted by Geoschmo:
By playing the same number of lower ranked people in 1 v 1 games, he has the same potential gain <...>
|
That's not true, I think. You don't take into account that the more you win 1 v 1 games, the less increases your rating after each game. That's because of rating difference of players is taken into account (your opponents rating drops down). It will take more games to get the same increment than number of players in one multi-player game. And a single loss increases that number...
Yeh ganging up is a problem, but hasn't it been a problem before Ratings too? High rated players might gangup against lower rated if they feel a threat of early destruction of their empires.
I think SE4 rating System is good as it is.
|

September 7th, 2003, 07:00 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Rating System
SE4 Ratings Game I
BBegemott wins.
I was lucky that you divided your fleet into two parts- one was sitting on the warp and other- retrofitting(?). The outcome could be different at all, if you have kept your ships in one place, and protected the warp with sats and fighters.
After the warp deffence was penetrated, your inner planets became an easy target.
Thanks for the game Geo.
|

September 7th, 2003, 07:17 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Rating System
Just finished the yard. Gotta put groceries away and shower...THEN site update  .
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

September 7th, 2003, 09:17 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Rating System
Site updated:
Geo over Deccan;
BBegemott over Geo
Geo (verified) vs Gandalph (unverified...but I will list him for the game since it's kind of unlikely someone would join such a game and NOT count it as a rated game  );
Grandpa Kim (verified) vs Phoenix-D (unverified)
There, have I missed anything?
[PS: To Geo, I received both game results in the same message, so I did calculations based on the one listed first as the first one.]
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

September 7th, 2003, 09:33 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Rating System
You can consider the KOTH game verified.
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

September 7th, 2003, 09:39 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: SE4 Rating System
Quote:
Originally posted by Slynky:
[PS: To Geo, I received both game results in the same message, so I did calculations based on the one listed first as the first one.]
|
Anyway you want to do it is fine with me. As long as I am not in Last place anymore. Woo Hoo! 
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

September 7th, 2003, 10:03 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: SE4 Rating System
Quote:
Originally posted by Phoenix-D:
You can consider the KOTH game verified.
|
Tks, Phoenix. (asterisk removed)
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|