|
|
|
|
|
February 18th, 2004, 04:01 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 209
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Retrofit Question
I am trying to do a retrofit. The original design costs a total of 14.56k and the new design costs a total of 20.92k. This is less than a 50% increase in vessel cost. However the cost of the retrofit is more than 50% of the original cost.
The "failure notice" states that the there can only be a maximum difference of 50% of the cost. Does this mean the cost of the retrofit and not of the designs?
Thanks...Greybeard
|
February 18th, 2004, 04:43 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Retrofit Question
Is this in a mod? The max cost difference is just the difference in vehicle design costs. What are the exact costs?
|
February 18th, 2004, 05:08 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 209
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Retrofit Question
First ship: 11k , 1k, 1.56k
2nd ship: 18k , 1k, 1.92k
|
February 18th, 2004, 05:09 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 209
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Retrofit Question
Also, it's stock 1.84...
|
February 18th, 2004, 05:09 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 209
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Retrofit Question
Ooops...
[ February 18, 2004, 03:10: Message edited by: Greybeard ]
|
February 18th, 2004, 05:24 AM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Retrofit Question
Quote:
Originally posted by Greybeard:
First ship: 11k , 1k, 1.56k
2nd ship: 18k , 1k, 1.92k
|
11 + 1 + 1.56 = 13.56
18 + 1 + 1.92 = 20.92
13.56 * 1.5 = 20.34.
20.92 is greater than 13.56 * 1.5 which is why the retrofit is failing.
Slick.
[ February 18, 2004, 03:24: Message edited by: Slick ]
__________________
Slick.
|
February 18th, 2004, 05:25 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 482
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Retrofit Question
Uh huh. 18 / 11 = 1.63?
aaah... I see. Thanks for clearing that up Slick.
[ February 18, 2004, 03:27: Message edited by: Cipher7071 ]
__________________
The great tragedy of science...the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact. (T. H. Huxley)
|
February 18th, 2004, 05:26 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 209
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Retrofit Question
Thanks Slick.
I added incorrectly and got 14.56 for the first ship. Maybe that's why I dropped being a math major 27 years ago...Greybeard
|
February 18th, 2004, 07:34 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Retrofit Question
Quote:
Originally posted by Cipher7071:
Uh huh. 18 / 11 = 1.63?
|
It is total resource cost that can not differ by more than 50%, not each resource individually.
|
February 18th, 2004, 07:45 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Retrofit Question
so you can only *pulls out a tiny little calculater* add 16% to the ships value in each mineral? well, i suppose it cuts down on fast building. *tugs at a wisker* but it kind of makes retrofitting useless for some stuff.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|