|
|
|
|
|
April 28th, 2004, 05:54 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
I dont understand Serpent Cataphracts
When playing Pythium Default, why should one ever purchase a Serpent Cataphract?
They cost more than any other standard heavy cav unit around, and are slower, not sacred, are cold blooded but without any type of swamp survival or special resistances. "armored in the heaviest possible barding" my foot -- they have 18 protection, which is quite good but nothing to write home about.
Why 60 gold? More scary: why 58 resources?? I dont get it. I'd much rather wait to pounce upon Indy heavy cav. What am I failing to see?
thanks in advance
|
April 28th, 2004, 06:10 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,050
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: I dont understand Serpent Cataphracts
The lizard continues to fight after the rider is dead. Still not very good though, I don't think I've ever build any except for curiosity's sake.
[ April 28, 2004, 17:11: Message edited by: Teraswaerto ]
__________________
Great indebtedness does not make men grateful, but vengeful; and if a little charity is not forgotten, it turns into a gnawing worm.
|
April 28th, 2004, 06:18 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 790
Thanks: 7
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: I dont understand Serpent Cataphracts
The costs should be lowered. Hydra and Hatchling aren't sacred in 'Default' too and they are both cheaper then in 'Serpent Kult'.
|
April 28th, 2004, 06:35 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: I dont understand Serpent Cataphracts
Quote:
Originally posted by tinkthank:
"armored in the heaviest possible barding" my foot -- they have 18 protection, which is quite good but nothing to write home about.
|
That's as heavy as Pythium's armor gets.
|
April 28th, 2004, 07:51 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: I dont understand Serpent Cataphracts
They have a decent bite. Pythium is already a strong nation due to high protection, high attack, high defense soldiers (some with javalins). Making their cav equal to others would make them a dominant race (as if they aren't already).
|
April 28th, 2004, 08:55 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: I dont understand Serpent Cataphracts
Quote:
Originally posted by DeathDaemon:
Pythium is already a strong nation due to high protection, high attack, high defense soldiers (some with javalins). Making their cav equal to others would make them a dominant race (as if they aren't already).
|
Well put.
__________________
God does not play dice, He plays Dominions Albert von Ulm
|
April 28th, 2004, 09:50 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nuts-Land, counting them.
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: I dont understand Serpent Cataphracts
I dont quite follow you. If the rational is to give a crappy unit, that nobody will ever use, just so that we can say 'see Pythium has weak units too, so they are not overpowered', then I dont understand.
__________________
Currently playing: Dominions III, Civilization IV, Ageod American Civil War.
|
April 28th, 2004, 10:00 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: I dont understand Serpent Cataphracts
Personally I have found the cataphracts rather useful. But only in limited contexts. As the hydras and other pythium troops generally don't mix (unless you get flying hydras on attack rear), pythium is left with a bunch of slow moving troops that don't do any damage to the enemy until they reach javelin range. Cataphracts (standard not holy) can be build everywhere, and serve nicely on the flanks, where they are likely to resist a long while against heavy oposition, and do serious damage against light oposition, not to mention flanking possibilities. Of course, native knights are probably equally good and cheaper, but a lot harder to come by in numbers. Their additional size comes in as an additional bonus when facing annoying things such as iron boars, etc; which eat up size 2 troopers all too easily.
|
April 28th, 2004, 10:02 PM
|
|
Re: I dont understand Serpent Cataphracts
Quote:
Originally posted by Pocus:
I dont quite follow you. If the rational is to give a crappy unit, that nobody will ever use, just so that we can say 'see Pythium has weak units too, so they are not overpowered', then I dont understand.
|
The Serpent Capharact is usable, not neither is it cheap nor usable in every situation. That means that it can and will fill a gap, but it's not going to be a standard to be on par with every other nation because Pythium has no need for them to be powerful/strong.
If the Capharact was on the same level as Arco's cavalry I would say it's useless or weak and you would never have a reason to build them. But as they stand now, you don't really build them right now for the most part but you could if you needed it is not because they are weak, but because Principe's are very decent and more cost effective unless you need a cavalry charge.
NOTE: Now with Serpent Cult, it should be modified to be built at any Fortress that is one thing I think should be done with the Capharact.
|
April 28th, 2004, 10:06 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: I dont understand Serpent Cataphracts
Quote:
Originally posted by Pocus:
I dont quite follow you. If the rational is to give a crappy unit, that nobody will ever use, just so that we can say 'see Pythium has weak units too, so they are not overpowered', then I dont understand.
|
I'd prefer that to making Serpent Cataphracts powerful enough to match the knights of Man or Ulm. Anyway, they're not _that_ crappy. Until you find better independent cavalry, they're your fastest unit and may find a use as flankers. Or to raid C'tis/Miasma if you need to move fast and/or can't afford Hydras.
__________________
God does not play dice, He plays Dominions Albert von Ulm
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|