|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 12th, 2005, 02:08 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2005 
						Posts: 112
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Beams v Missiles 
 Yeah, those ducks are dangerous. 
Sorry, just the image of people throwing ducks at each other 'in earnest'.   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 12th, 2005, 04:34 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: USA 
						Posts: 15,630
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 31 Times in 19 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Beams v Missiles 
 Missiles suck period.  The moment you get Point defense weapons missiles become utterly useless. 
				__________________Creator of the Star Trek Mod - AST Mod - 78 Ship Sets - Conquest Mod - Atrocities Star Wars Mod - Galaxy Reborn Mod - and Subterfuge Mod.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 12th, 2005, 01:08 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Calgary, Canada 
						Posts: 858
					 Thanks: 2 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Beams v Missiles 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Atrocities said: Missiles suck period.
 
 |  I'll say it too:
 
Missiles suck period.
 
You can't say it too often.
				__________________ 
				Those who can, do. 
Those who can't, teach. 
Those who can't teach, slag.
 http://se4-gaming.net/ |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 12th, 2005, 01:18 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ohio 
						Posts: 8,450
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Beams v Missiles 
 About the only use I have for missles anymore is for early game scout frigates. People around here have developed a nasty habit of setting their colony ships to ram instead of waiting patiently for my DUC frigates to blow them away. I have a strict policy that any ship captain stupid enough to get himself killed by an unarmed ship gets his purple heart posthumously revoked.    
A missle frigate set to max range does a nice approximation of the missle dance in simultaneous games and about half the time in my experience will stay far enough away from the colony ship to not get rammed into oblivion. They also do nicely for glassing those border colonies before the other guy gets his mine fields up or his PDC WP's built.
 
Definetly an early game weapon only against a human player.
				__________________I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
 Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 12th, 2005, 02:45 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 
						Posts: 253
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Beams v Missiles 
 Interesting.... 
 I usually put 10-25 satellites up with 2 capital missles a piece to help defend important frontier planets. Its generally the first defense system I get into place. It seems to do fairly well for small fleets (20 to 50 missiles). Warfleets of course are another story but I dont expect my planets to initially be able to handle a warfleet.
 
 Again.. stock game.
 
 Has anyone else tried this? Satellites seem to be useless for anything else but spying.
 
 Rasorow
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 12th, 2005, 02:53 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Shrapnel Fanatic |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Southern CA, USA 
						Posts: 18,394
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Beams v Missiles 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Grandpa Kim said: 
 
	I'll say it too:Quote: 
	
		| Atrocities said: Missiles suck period.
 
 |  
 Missiles suck period.
 
 You can't say it too often.
 
 |  So play a mod like Adamant where missiles definitely do not suck.    |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 12th, 2005, 03:24 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ohio 
						Posts: 8,450
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Beams v Missiles 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Rasorow said: Interesting....
 
 I usually put 10-25 satellites up with 2 capital missles a piece to help defend important frontier planets. Its generally the first defense system I get into place. It seems to do fairly well for small fleets (20 to 50 missiles). Warfleets of course are another story but I dont expect my planets to initially be able to handle a warfleet.
 
 Again.. stock game.
 
 Has anyone else tried this? Satellites seem to be useless for anything else but spying.
 
 Rasorow
 
 |  I have, with mixed results. A lot of times I've found the enemy can get in and kill the planet before the sats can get to them. The missles might take them out anyway, if they don't have sufficent PDC, but trading a colony for a handful of ships usually is a bad trade.
				__________________I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
 Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 25th, 2005, 04:46 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: In your mind. 
						Posts: 2,241
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Beams v Missiles 
 Missiles are good early in the game. My first research project is usually DUC up to LvlV and use them (sparsely) on my early warships. As soon as my APBs surpass DUCks, (hahaha very funny Narf       ) I use them. I don't usually build much warships in the Early Times, but I usually start building them with APBs Lvl IV and later, in the End Times I use APBs as my main weapon. I rarely use HEDs, specially because WMGs have such a slow reload time. Missiles? Mostly in the Early Times, but also in the Middle Times. (Took these from Homeworld2 (Demo)) Missiles are useful for glassing planets early on and in the Middle Times, when forward colonies have no WeapPlats and I have no troops. I rarely capture planets btw    I usually just glass them and then recolonize them. Especially if I can't colonize them I just glass them.
				__________________O'Neill: I have something I want to confess you. The name's not Kirk. It's Skywalker. Luke Skywalker.
 -Stargate SG1
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 2nd, 2005, 07:16 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: In your mind. 
						Posts: 2,241
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Beams v Missiles 
 Is this post still alive? 
				__________________O'Neill: I have something I want to confess you. The name's not Kirk. It's Skywalker. Luke Skywalker.
 -Stargate SG1
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 2nd, 2005, 09:18 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Ohio 
						Posts: 8,450
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Beams v Missiles 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| StrategiaInUltima said: Is this post still alive?
 
 |  You might also check out this thread,  Beams v Missles  We ended up with two threads with the same name, and there are some possibly helpful comments in the other one.
				__________________I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
 Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |