|
|
|
 |
|

March 12th, 2006, 09:59 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 590
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Longdead Archery vs SC\'s/High Quality Summons
Wouldnt' a banelord with a shield be punching?
|

March 13th, 2006, 01:43 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Longdead Archery vs SC\'s/High Quality Summons
Machaka is a good nation... except for province defense. Machaka is one of the few which will have their province defense lose to call of the winds.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

March 13th, 2006, 01:57 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,606
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Longdead Archery vs SC\'s/High Quality Summons
Quote:
OG_Gleep said:
Wouldnt' a banelord with a shield be punching?
|
just give him a cheap weapon (even punching hed probably kill them  )
|

March 14th, 2006, 11:20 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Longdead Archery vs SC\'s/High Quality Summons
I thought longdead attacks caused decay, which did affect undead and did not cause fatigue, no?
|

March 14th, 2006, 11:39 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Longdead Archery vs SC\'s/High Quality Summons
My recollection is that decay simply adds poison and fatigue to the commander every turn. Undead are immune to both, so decay won't affect them. Bane venom is described as causing a fast-acting disease, only undeads can safely carry Bane Venom Charms; Banes (the source of Bane Venom) are undead and the Lord of Banefires is undead, and neither of them are affected. So there are various precedents for Decay to only affect the living, and they agree with my memory of the mechanics.
|

March 15th, 2006, 01:18 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 262
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Longdead Archery vs SC\'s/High Quality Summons
Based on a small sample, being baned by an archer does 0 to 15 points of fatigue per round and, since the victims were themselves longdead archers, does effect undead. The effect is not poision.
|

March 15th, 2006, 02:02 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Longdead Archery vs SC\'s/High Quality Summons
I think there's poison too, but with 100% poison immunity for undead, it would never be added to the poison pool.
|

March 15th, 2006, 02:05 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Longdead Archery vs SC\'s/High Quality Summons
also, it seems at least some troops die at the end of combat when decay is cast on them. probably the undead.
|

March 15th, 2006, 04:49 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Longdead Archery vs SC\'s/High Quality Summons
Troops only die from decay at the end of combat if their regeneration can't keep up with it. It's the same way troops die from poison at the end of combat. A Wyrm that gets hit by decay, and is at 256 HP in friendly dominion, won't die at the end of combat.
|

March 15th, 2006, 12:19 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Longdead Archery vs SC\'s/High Quality Summons
Decay/banefire seem to have the same effect (the banefire spell/shield/arrows also gives some initial damage). The troop gets a reddish glow and looses a small amount of hp per turn, but for the rest of the battle, even after they have won. It is possible for regenerating or really high hp unit to survive.
I have not seen any poison damage associated with decay or banefire. Undead are immune to both, though.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|