|
|
|
|
|
October 9th, 2006, 07:17 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 2,059
Thanks: 229
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Re: Population Question`
Quote:
Nerfix said:
Quote:
Foodstamp said:
"Yes, but it seems a lot of the players would like there to be growth. Giving an "Inherent population growth" option at the start of the game would be good."
You are given this, it costs your pretender 40 points at the creation screen.
|
We're also given the option to tweak the amount of gold, supplies and resources at the game setup! And guess what, these cost 0 points! And they apply for everyone.
Sure we can pay 40 points but with only 350 points to use it's more expensive than you make it to be.
Your argument is like saying "There shouldn't be a way to modify the gold generation in the world because you can always pay 40 design points and take Order"
|
Sounds good to me . Whats the point of having scales in the game if your just gonna counter them with those types of settings? Research is another I believe you can do that with.
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
|
October 9th, 2006, 07:30 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Population Question`
Well, we have been able to modify the amount of Gold in the world ever since Dominions 1. I guess it's that devs thought of giving the players a chance to play in a richer or poorer world.
In Dominions 3 we can change a lot of things at game setup that can be changed with scales. Gold, resources, supplies, even research. so why not population?
Give the players the option to do that. You don't have to use it.
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
October 9th, 2006, 07:58 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 2,059
Thanks: 229
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Re: Population Question`
I wouldn't use it. But, I understand alot of you guys would, so I am not against it.
But most of this thread has been about there being positive population growth with a 0 growth scale because people "naturally" expand in population without any outside influences.
And that is what I don't want. To log into version 3.01 and be like, oh well, growth 0 is really growth 1, GG shrapnel forums, gonna use my 40 points elsewhere.
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
|
October 9th, 2006, 08:06 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Population Question`
Quote:
Nerfix said:
Sure we can pay 40 points but with only 350 points to use it's more expensive than you make it to be.
|
Just as a small reference, it takes Growth+1 (+0.2% population, +2% income [and an irrelevant boost to supplies]) 49 turns in a province to bring in the same income as Order+1.
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|
October 9th, 2006, 08:19 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 2,059
Thanks: 229
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Re: Population Question`
Growth scale also seems to affect the types of "Something unexpected has happened in this province" messages I get in my games. I don't have any tested proof or references to back it up, but it seems the scales affect my random events.
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
|
October 9th, 2006, 08:28 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Population Question`
I think that terrain types should have an effect on population growth (say farmlands +0,2, plains/forest +0,1, swamp -0,1, waste -0,2, freshwater +0,1, with fort +0,1 ; or something directly based on supplies) as well as the actual population (something like province with 30k+ pop -0,1, province under 5k +0,1, province under 2k +0,2). Say you control a farmland province which has lost much of its population. The 1k remaining people have lots of rich lands to exploit, logically their number should grow fast. In the other hand I don't think that 35k guys trying to survive with the rare supplies of a waste should have an automatic growth.
But I don't really think it's worth the effort to implement this kind of system, and without it having just the effects of the growth scale is better than an arbitrary automatic growth.
|
October 9th, 2006, 08:49 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Population Question`
Quote:
Twan said:
Say you control a farmland province which has lost much of its population. The 1k remaining people have lots of rich lands to exploit, logically their number should grow fast.
|
Well, maybe their birth rate will increase, but bear in mind that babies are not productive at all, they don't work at the farms to generate supply, nor do they pay taxes, and they take many years to grow to be productive :O
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|
October 9th, 2006, 10:05 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Population Question`
Quote:
Foodstamp said:
Growth scale also seems to affect the types of "Something unexpected has happened in this province" messages I get in my games. I don't have any tested proof or references to back it up, but it seems the scales affect my random events.
|
Scales DO affect events. As an example, wealthy princes don't die in Growth dominion and immigrating people don't just suddenly decide to appear in a province with Death scale. Similarly, trolls under the bridge won't attack travelers in Drain dominion, but it's much more rare or perhaps impossible to find gems and magic items.
|
October 9th, 2006, 10:12 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Population Question`
The problem as I see it, is that (at least in Dom 2, I'm still waiting for my dom3 copy) if you want to take a God thematically connected to Life, you will have a very hard time - as far as I can gather from what I have read, in MP you would actually be signing your death. If you wage war with a death-scale nation, they wave wasted their provinces in such a manner that you have no way of repopulating them, so occupying them is just loading yourself with dead weight - literally. I don't know if the answer to this is natural growing population rates, but there should be *some* way for life/nature related gods to repopulate dead lands in a *feasible* way. As it now stands, the best thing that such a god can hope for is to win the dominion war on his own lands. Hardly a feat worthy of a would-be god.
|
October 9th, 2006, 11:27 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Population Question`
I think rituals or other ways to repopulate provinces should be considered, with effects proportionnal to growth scale to make it a good option, but limited to provinces under x population (to avoid to see these rituals chain used on the most populated provinces)
In example a nature ritual, "ritual of fertility" multiplying by 10 the effect of growth scale on the target province for the turn may be a good idea for this (and/or the same as global enchant, and/or, why not, an astral spell summoning population from a parallel plane, adding a number of pop proportionnal to magic and growth scales, or a "summer of love" fire global augmenting the effect of growth in hot seasons.
Even with this kind of rituals, repopulation would be far slower than killing people with a death dominion + tax at 200 and pillages, and cost a lot of gems.
Another possibility may be a demobilization order, making demobilized soldiers become normal citizen (but it would be a big advantage to order/productivity and luck dominions more than growth ones).
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|