|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 7th, 2007, 03:00 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2004 
						Posts: 559
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Research Costs 
 Deleted. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 7th, 2007, 08:38 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Sweden, Ume� 
						Posts: 991
					 Thanks: 5 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Research Costs 
 yes the system of costs for each level is like this (normal res):40 for first level, 60 for level 2...
 after that each level costs = two previous levels.
 
 so level 3 will be 100, then 160, 260 and etc.
 
 Think it's called a fibernacci series or some such.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 7th, 2007, 09:12 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Helsinki, Finland 
						Posts: 5,425
					 Thanks: 174 
		
			
				Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Research Costs 
 Fibonacci series. 
So, it'd be Easy: 20, 40, 60, 100, 160, 260, 420, 680, 1100, aggregate total 2840Normal: 40, 60, 100, 160, 260, 420, 680, 1100, 1780, aggregate total 4600Hard: 60, 100, 160, 260, 420, 680, 1100, 1780, 2880, aggregate total 7440Very Hard: 100, 160, 260, 420, 680, 1100, 1780, 2880, 4660, aggregate total 12040
 
Somebody had better verify that with a calculator, because I had to do that in my head and I might have made mistakes. Even so, those numbers aren't off by much.
 
Edi |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 7th, 2007, 11:32 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2006 
						Posts: 70
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Research Costs 
 I wish you could either mod the first two numbers of the series or scale the series. It's too easy to get to the end of the research tree on larger maps, even on "very hard." |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 7th, 2007, 09:26 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Rhode Island 
						Posts: 822
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Research Costs 
 If you want a super-slow magic game, try playing with very low gold and very low magic sites. You'll have a much harder time buying or summoning mages... |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 9th, 2007, 11:22 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2006 
						Posts: 70
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Research Costs 
 Ygorl, I always set the magic sites frequency very low, but I hadn't thought much about reducing the gold. I guess to balance things out between magic and armies I should probably reduce resources as well.
 Thanks for the suggestion!
 
 The more I think about it a generic Fibonacci series doesn't really seem a good match with the recruiting and research mechanics. Under normal game settings and assuming one does not purely concentrate or one or two paths of magic, the regular buildup of research points through recruiting combined with new fort building and finding mage recruiting provinces/sites make it often actually easier to research higher levels in a path than it was to research the earlier levels. If you added a geometric series component it would help. The cost for each level would be the Nth term in the Fibonacci series times (1+scaler)^(N-1).
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |