|
|
|
View Poll Results: When shall we start
|
Friday
|
|
2 |
40.00% |
Saturday
|
|
2 |
40.00% |
Sunday
|
|
1 |
20.00% |
|
|
March 18th, 2007, 08:36 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 290
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
ok - how long are we going to play tonight?
|
March 18th, 2007, 08:38 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 167
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
seems the server crashed, guess thats my queue, I got work in 6 hours.
If the rest of you really want to continue you can set me to ai or let me stale up to 4 turns.
|
March 18th, 2007, 08:39 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 290
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
its ok Methel - lest make a turn or two and lets finish it for today,. It's 1am here...
|
March 18th, 2007, 08:57 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 167
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
thats it for me guys, good night
|
March 19th, 2007, 01:49 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
Open letter to Jazzepi, god of T'ien Ch'i:
Greetings my friend,
I beg your pardon, but it seems that the massages on the forum are not red or understood by you, so I took the freedom to communicate with you thought this, rather formal way.
My concern is that you took too provinces that are very close to my capital. There is only 1 province separating them from my capital. Since we have a non agression pact I can't attack you, but your acts are somewhat hostile, as if you would only wait for the end of the before mentioned pact to invade my heartland. If we can't reach to some kind of mutually beneficial solution I'm terribly afraid that I need to cancel our pact, and this would somewhat affect our peaceful relations. I don't wish to mention the horrific possibility of a full scale war.
Thanks a lot for your kind understanding,
Your friend,
DreamSlayer, God of Man
|
March 19th, 2007, 02:12 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 290
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
Well, I understand that if you have choosen this kind of "communication channel" you expect that others will say something. In my opinion, which can be wrong of course, advancing and taking INDEPENDENT provinces is not a hostile action. No matter where those INDEPENDENT provinces are located. Unless of course, your pact was saying something about those INDEPENDENT provinces. Of course you may dislike his movments, but as far as I understand the situation, he makes everything according to the rules.
Also, as far as we used to play, Nations with NAPs CAN fight with each other, but ONly on the INDEPENDET's lands... Saying simply - atack those INDEPENDENT provinces also - there can be only one
Look - with Pangea, Arco has a very clear situation - we have war
ONE MORE THING TO THOSE WHO DONT READ EMAILS:
SERVER HAS BEEN RELOCATED, SO PLEASE, MAKE YOUR MOVES ONCE AGAIN FOR THIS TURN!!!!
|
March 19th, 2007, 02:21 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
*Out of Character*
I'm fairly sure you aren't allowed to cancel pacts for any reason, WSzaboPeter. Besides of course the other person violating it in same way. The NAP we setup didn't stipulate anything about invading neutral territories close to your capital.
You may be unhappy with Tein'chi's expansion, but that's part of the problem with making pacts! I made one with the lizard race in my newbie PBEM game and he's basically over-running the world right now. Even 3vs1 we might still lose.
Jazzepi
|
March 19th, 2007, 02:22 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
Kojusoki, that's wise. I will attack and take only those 2 offending territories and then if T'ien Ch'i wishes peace I will grant him peace.
|
March 19th, 2007, 02:26 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 290
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
If they ARE INDEPENDENT - sure.
If something is not "not-allowed", it means that it is allowed.
|
March 19th, 2007, 02:46 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 167
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Late Era - OPEN for players
Hmm, I think the diplomacy rules are a bit constraining, how about we use sheps rules of diplomacy instead, makes for a more interesting game imho.
Also I would considert taking a province bordering my capital a hostile move, about as hostile as when you attacked me koju
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|