.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

BCT Commander- Save $7.00
winSPWW2- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 3: The Awakening

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 22nd, 2008, 08:11 PM
cleveland's Avatar

cleveland cleveland is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: guess - and you'll be wrong
Posts: 834
Thanks: 33
Thanked 187 Times in 66 Posts
cleveland is on a distinguished road
Default Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion

Apparently, units defending a stormed fortress survive if they retreat from the battle.

This seems unthematic to me. I'm curious to know what the community thinks.

Should fort defenders - who otherwise couldn't leave the besieged fortress, and would die if retreating during a sally - survive if they retreat when the fortress is stormed?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 22nd, 2008, 08:22 PM

CUnknown CUnknown is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 947
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
CUnknown is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion

I kind of agree they should be killed, thematically speaking. I wouldn't mind if that's what actually happened.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 22nd, 2008, 08:42 PM
Meglobob's Avatar

Meglobob Meglobob is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,198
Thanks: 90
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
Meglobob is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion

But what about the secret escape tunnel every castle has?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 22nd, 2008, 08:45 PM
vfb's Avatar

vfb vfb is offline
General
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
vfb is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion

Fort defenders can survive if they retreat during a sally (break siege). They can retreat to any neighboring friendly provinces. They just can't retreat back into the fort.

Apparently nearly all forts have a secret escape passage in the rear. "To the tunnels!"
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 22nd, 2008, 09:05 PM

llamabeast llamabeast is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
llamabeast will become famous soon enoughllamabeast will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion

I was definitely envisaging a secret escape tunnel. If I had a fort, it would have a secret escape tunnel. Obviously the would-be gods of the Dominions world think similarly.
__________________
www.llamaserver.net
LlamaServer FAQ
My mod nations: Tomb Kings and Vampire Counts
A compilation of high quality mod nations: Expanded Nations Packs
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 22nd, 2008, 09:46 PM

Digress Digress is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 437
Thanks: 18
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Digress is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion

I think retreat from a besieged fort should either be impossible or at the very least fraught with danger.

Some percentage chance of escape after the castle has been stormed based on the patrol strength of the besieging army perhaps.

You could also argue that non-stealth troops/leaders should be able to withdraw before the castle is stormed, taking the risk that they will be discovered be the besieging army whilst making their escap. This would again be based on the patrol strength of the besieging army - perhaps with bonuses accrueing with the length of the siege.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 22nd, 2008, 10:33 PM
Jazzepi's Avatar

Jazzepi Jazzepi is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
Jazzepi is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion

I think it's fine as is. Historically completely surrounding a fortress was a difficult and time consuming practice. Sieging a castle was avoided if at all possible (there was actually an intricate system of parley where time lines for the siege could be established, whereby the occupants would surrender if help did not arrive in time, and/or time given for a vassal to ask his liege for instructions), and sieging involved spreading your forces thin to encircle the entirety of the castle's perimeter.

From a realistic perspective since your forces are clearly storming the castle from the front, whole hog, I see no reason why this should involve the death of all the occupants. Castles were built with the idea that one could retreat from one secure area to the next as they fell, allowing a small contingent of soldiers to inflict massive casualties on a relatively much larger force.

From a game play perspective I see no problem with the fact that once you've conquered all the territories around the fortress, your reward is that all the defenders die, and your punishment for not doing so is that some of the defenders might escape. By removing the escaping of the defenders, you remove an interesting choice that the seigers have to make.

I know, multiple times, I've made particular strategic moves to cut off retreat lines.

Ask Lazy Perfectionist. He was playing LA Atlantis against my LA R'yleh. I was able to corner his go, and attack both flanking provinces at the same time. Though none of my 300 + lobo guards could even damage his like 35 defense 23 protection God who also had Luck, they managed to kill enough other guys to force him to retreat.

Imagine the same scenario in a castle. It would be a lot less interesting from a gameplay perspective if all I had to do was pin him down and then route his forces. Instead I would have had to, quite literally, surround the castle.

I also think it allows for interesting scenarios. Maybe where you have two armies. One inside of a castle, one outside, and you conquer a single territory outside a castle, allowing your first army to attack the invaders, and then retreat back into that territory, thereby surrendering the castle, but preserving your forces.

Jazzepi
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 22nd, 2008, 10:37 PM
sector24's Avatar
sector24 sector24 is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 509
Thanks: 84
Thanked 44 Times in 14 Posts
sector24 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion

They just dial up the Stargate to an adjacent province.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old January 23rd, 2008, 04:41 AM
Endoperez's Avatar

Endoperez Endoperez is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
Endoperez is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion

Can they retreat if someone is still besieging? Or does that only happen when the besieger sent all of his forces to storm the castle?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old January 23rd, 2008, 10:53 AM
cleveland's Avatar

cleveland cleveland is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: guess - and you'll be wrong
Posts: 834
Thanks: 33
Thanked 187 Times in 66 Posts
cleveland is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Fort Retreat Survival --> call for discussion

Quote:
Endoperez said:
Can they retreat if someone is still besieging? Or does that only happen when the besieger sent all of his forces to storm the castle?
Just tested: yes, retreating defenders will survive even if the attacker leaves a commander on "Siege."

Quote:
vfb said:
Fort defenders can survive if they retreat during a sally (break siege). They can retreat to any neighboring friendly provinces. They just can't retreat back into the fort.
Page 69 of the manual, under Break Siege movement command: "Units which retreat are eliminated." If you're sure they aren't eliminated, then [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Bug.gif[/img]?

Quote:
Jazzepi said:
It would be a lot less interesting from a gameplay perspective if all I had to do was pin him down and then route his forces. Instead I would have had to, quite literally, surround the castle.
Then shouldn't the fort defender be able to freely move troops in & out of the fort? In my mind, whatever circumstance prevents defenders from leaving a besieged fort should also prevent them from safely fleeing it when stormed.

Quote:
sector24 said:
They just dial up the Stargate to an adjacent province.

It is the Fargate. We're not getting sued.



There's a larger strategic consequence here:
Intuitively, when an enemy force approaches one of my forts, I SHOULD face two choices:
(1) withdraw the defenders, sacrificing the fort but saving the troops
OR
(2) dig in, keeping the fort at the risk of the defenders' annihilation

Instead, I'm faced with no such choice: the smartest, most obvious option is to always dig in; if besieged, simply teleport in as many BagsOfWine needed to keep the troops full; when the walls are breached, retreat. I get to have my cake and eat it too: I deny my enemy the fort (and more importantly, his besieging army) for as long as possible, and STILL get to keep my defenders. Nonsense.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.