|
|
|
|
August 4th, 2008, 10:35 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 234
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
to hit %?
How are to hit %'s calculated?
|
August 4th, 2008, 11:16 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: to hit %?
Base + positive modifiers - negative modifiers.
<1 is treated as 1%, and >99 is treated as 99%
The SE4 Talisman forces accuracy to be 100% always at this point.
Unfortunately this means that if you have a 10% chance to hit, and add a sensor worth +10, it doubles your hit rate.
Therefore when modding, be sure to keep all your modifiers small, so that you do not stray too far from 50%. Thus ensuring that your modifiers continue to provide sane effect amounts in practice.
__________________
Things you want:
|
August 5th, 2008, 02:04 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 234
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: to hit %?
Thank you. And, for anyone reading this, Base = 100% - distance modifier.
|
August 6th, 2008, 08:42 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 3,070
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: to hit %?
Quote:
Suicide Junkie said: Unfortunately this means that if you have a 10% chance to hit, and add a sensor worth +10, it doubles your hit rate.
|
Why is that "unfortunate"? That's exactly the behavior one would expect from additive bonuses.
__________________
Cap'n Q
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
|
August 6th, 2008, 09:09 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: to hit %?
Exactly.
A "10%" additive bonus can mean anything from "no effect" to "11x the hit rate" to an actual 10% improvement.
__________________
Things you want:
|
August 6th, 2008, 01:32 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: to hit %?
Friends don't let friends add percents!
|
August 7th, 2008, 12:01 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 105
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: to hit %?
Quote:
Suicide Junkie said:Therefore when modding, be sure to keep all your modifiers small, so that you do not stray too far from 50%. Thus ensuring that your modifiers continue to provide sane effect amounts in practice.
|
Actually, I've been experimenting with huge to-hit modifiers and have seen some interesting effects. All things considered, I think some of them make sense.
Really...a Fighter a few feet away from a Worldship shouldn't miss. Ever. Meanwhile, the Worldship's 30,000mm cannon should have a higher chance of accidentally smashing into the fighter than actually shooting it.
__________________
I'm sewage flavored.
|
August 13th, 2008, 08:30 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: to hit %?
Oh, there are certainly some occasions when you want that, but they are not the general case, and you have to take care that you don't pollute your typical calculations with them.
In CBmod, for example, planets have a +999% ECM because DF guns are precision munitions and a planet is a pretty big place with tiny targets on it. For widespread nukings, you need some planetary bombardment missiles.
I suppose I should refine that suggestion:
- There should only be at most ONE medium to large modifier applying to any one object at any time.
A base value to set the standard to-hit, and then small modifiers, totaling to not more than about 15-20. 25 if you're keeping the base at 50%, but only 10 if you have base to-hits that range as far as 25-75%
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|