|
|
|
 |
|

February 4th, 2009, 08:14 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Madness - 24 players, MA+LA, CBM 1.4 (running)
I got hit with the "wrong turn number" llamaserver bug now. I have temporarily turned off quickhost and postponed the game by 12h, so llamabeast can take a look. If anyone has similar problems, just let me know via PM, so I can get things sorted out.
I think it's what chrispedersen reported too earlier. Did it happen in any other game for anyone before?
|

February 5th, 2009, 06:48 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Madness - 24 players, MA+LA, CBM 1.4 (running)
So, I don't really understand this. The game is on turn 11. Is the turn you're taking turn 11 Zeldor? What does the error message say? (It should say something like "The game is on turn 11 but you've sent in a file for turn 10).
I have a little script that tells me when game turn numbers are out of sync, but in this case it doesn't seem to think there's a problem so it must be a slightly unusual situation.
|

February 5th, 2009, 07:16 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Madness - 24 players, MA+LA, CBM 1.4 (running)
Er, so I took your turn for you Zeldor, and it worked just fine. Not sure what to make of that.
I recommend you retake it in any case, as I just hit "End turn".
|

February 5th, 2009, 07:56 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Madness - 24 players, MA+LA, CBM 1.4 (running)
It looks like I found the problem - .trn files I tried to use from llamaserver were probably corrupted. While they were for turn 11, they showed up as turn 10 in game. I downloaded a .trn file again and it showed up as turn11, I remade it and it got accepted. Hmm... it may be rather some dominions bug, not llamaserver.
|

February 6th, 2009, 06:49 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Madness - 24 players, MA+LA, CBM 1.4 (running)
We have 2 semifinalists already.
LA Mictlan defeated LA Ulm.
LA Bogarus defeated MA Man [he is AI].
We have few other nations on the way out too.
|

February 6th, 2009, 09:17 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 827
Thanks: 23
Thanked 27 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Madness - 24 players, MA+LA, CBM 1.4 (running)
LA Pangaea will probably beat me (LA Agartha) sooner than later. Darn dual-shield Gorgon 
|

February 6th, 2009, 11:23 AM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Madness - 24 players, MA+LA, CBM 1.4 (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeldor
We have 2 semifinalists already.
LA Mictlan defeated LA Ulm.
LA Bogarus defeated MA Man [he is AI].
We have few other nations on the way out too.
|
Whoever said Bogarus wasn't an awesome rusher nation! 
__________________
i crossed blades with the mightiest warriors of the golden age. i witnessed with sorrow the schism that led to the passing of legends. now my sword hangs in its scabbard, with nothing but memories to keep it warm.
|

February 6th, 2009, 11:32 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Madness - 24 players, MA+LA, CBM 1.4 (running)
A hard fought victory. Hats off to you sir Jazzepi! =) And yes, that extra fort would've made a huge diff! The minstrels shall sing of this war throughout the land. (AFter I root them out and put them in Russian prison for a bit but hey)
|

February 6th, 2009, 01:04 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Madness - 24 players, MA+LA, CBM 1.4 (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KissBlade
A hard fought victory. Hats off to you sir Jazzepi! =) And yes, that extra fort would've made a huge diff! The minstrels shall sing of this war throughout the land. (AFter I root them out and put them in Russian prison for a bit but hey)
|
*angry fist shake*
I guess I can't really feel that bad. My plan was to make a ridiculous amount of minstrels, and capital-unrest-rush whomever my neighbor was. I wasn't really planning on getting a dragon dropped on my capital that early. I also had unrest events in my capital on turn 2, and 3, meaning I couldn't capitalize on the mercenaries!
Good luck in the game.
Also, you have ballz of steel for dropping your dragon into my capital like that. I did that once with a wyrm, and he just got his proverbial butt kicked. Maybe dragons are considered more durable than I thought?
Jazzepi
Last edited by Jazzepi; February 6th, 2009 at 01:16 PM..
|

February 6th, 2009, 01:22 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Madness - 24 players, MA+LA, CBM 1.4 (running)
To be honest, I completely misread your scales. I saw early heat scales from opposing dominions and no real incursions with my scouts. As a result, I predicted that you were Bandar (crappy PD, no real defense against a dragon, which was awed + dual pathed to give some extra defense + quickness if need be save blessed sacreds which your scales looked too high to do) and made the air drop from there. You might also find it amusing that I jacked up the pd on a bunch of provinces because I was anticipating an atavi archer stealth raid. Imagine my surprise when I saw blessed wardens instead! (ouch!! I was pretty scared of those =) ) Thankfully my research priority was lightning bolt and regeneration so it was just a matter of stalling/harrassing till my mages + chaff were in place.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|