|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 28th, 2009, 03:46 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Modena, Italy 
						Posts: 192
					 Thanks: 27 
		
			
				Thanked 21 Times in 10 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.6 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| An alternative would be to keep it low cost and no research for LA, and make another version for EA and MA requiring research and some more gems. |  
	Quote: 
	
		| You could just #copyspell it and make it available for all ages but cheaper for LA Pan. |  That's pretty much what I was thinking about. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 28th, 2009, 04:58 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Private |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2009 
						Posts: 2
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.6 
 Hopefully we hear the conclusion from QM. If it is a bug then I'll love the new CBM but if it is a feature new version just killed my game   |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 28th, 2009, 09:58 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Alaska 
						Posts: 2,968
					 Thanks: 24 
		
			
				Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.6 
 A nerf was intentional, but not as drastic as it turned out (I forgot just how sucky it was unmodded). Next version it will probably go back as it was for LA, and +10 gems +1n/d needed for other eras. |  
	
		
			| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to quantum_mechani For This Useful Post: |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 30th, 2009, 12:59 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Me a viking 
						Posts: 1,012
					 Thanks: 81 
		
			
				Thanked 122 Times in 73 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.6 
 Now that sounds just about perfect. 
				__________________ Voice of ***** and her spicy crew! |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 30th, 2009, 01:21 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2006 
						Posts: 3,445
					 Thanks: 85 
		
			
				Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.6 
 Has anyone noticed how quantum_mechani is a genius? 
				__________________You've sailed off the edge of the map--here there be badgers!
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 1st, 2009, 09:44 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2008 
						Posts: 913
					 Thanks: 21 
		
			
				Thanked 53 Times in 33 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.6 
 I have a suggestion about buffs. Not a balance thing, but something that could improve battle scripting. Reduce range on some buff spells, so caster will cast them on the squad that you intended the spell for and therefore put the caster close by.
 Example: I had an army with two groups of centaurs that I placed on flanks with attack rear and a bunch of archers in the middle. I had two pans intended to cast haste on the two centaur groups. But, since haste has a range of ten and there were much more archers, pans chose to buff them, which is completely illogical. If the range for the spell had been five or less, I could have positioned them to cast on centaurs.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 1st, 2009, 12:46 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Me a viking 
						Posts: 1,012
					 Thanks: 81 
		
			
				Thanked 122 Times in 73 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.6 
 That might be a good idea! Not sure how it would play out but certainly worth trying.
 On the other hand there are many situation where I love the AOE buffs having some range. Like Earth mages casting weapons of sharpness on my frontline after their script has run out etc...
 
				__________________ Voice of ***** and her spicy crew! |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 1st, 2009, 04:12 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2009 
						Posts: 2,157
					 Thanks: 69 
		
			
				Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.6 
 Yeah, lack of range in AoE buffs leads to annoying situations.
 Like needing to risk your caster to archer fire to buff your front-line forces.
 
 Frankly, that just means you needed to place your casters farther back so only the centaurs were in range.  Surely there was *someplace* on the field where the caster was only in range of the centaurs.  (Otherwise, place units differently?)
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 1st, 2009, 04:41 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2008 
						Posts: 913
					 Thanks: 21 
		
			
				Thanked 53 Times in 33 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.6 
 No, there wasn't and I did not want to place them differently, why should I? Exposing casters to archer fire is a risk I am willing to take in order to get the needed buffs going. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				October 1st, 2009, 05:14 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Me a viking 
						Posts: 1,012
					 Thanks: 81 
		
			
				Thanked 122 Times in 73 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.6 
 I think it could be nice and thematic if you needed to risk putting mages in danger near your troops to buff them. 
				__________________ Voice of ***** and her spicy crew! |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |