|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 7th, 2010, 10:44 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2005 
						Posts: 3,327
					 Thanks: 4 
		
			
				Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Nations under CBM 1.6 
 As was hinted at above it seems really odd to me that the spiders (black and brown) have different bite damage depending on whether they have riders or not. That makes no sense. It's the same spider, it should be the same bite. 
 It won't make a big difference in terms of balance, but the riderless spiders getting the higher damage would be nice.
 |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to thejeff For This Useful Post: |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 7th, 2010, 12:41 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Finland 
						Posts: 827
					 Thanks: 23 
		
			
				Thanked 27 Times in 27 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Nations under CBM 1.6 
 Also on the MA Ulm issue, even making that 10% F/S/A random on master smiths a 100% one would be a good asset, compared to what they get now. In addition to reducing the cost/requirements of Iron angels.
 I know that QM is reluctant to add new content, such as spells, so reducing enc of the ulm blacksteel armors by 1 or 2 would create the same effect. Though that would make the ulmish full chains useless, so they would require some looking into also.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 7th, 2010, 12:48 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2007 
						Posts: 5,463
					 Thanks: 165 
		
			
				Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Nations under CBM 1.6 
 Could reduce enc on the blacksteels but increase resource cost even more. That would make the units distinct. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2010, 12:13 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Tel Aviv, Israel 
						Posts: 3,465
					 Thanks: 511 
		
			
				Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Nations under CBM 1.6 
 How fares MA Man in CBM 1.6?- In vanilla it is weak, has that improved? |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2010, 04:26 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Moscow, Russia 
						Posts: 1,045
					 Thanks: 177 
		
			
				Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Nations under CBM 1.6 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Sombre  Could reduce enc on the blacksteels but increase resource cost even more. That would make the units distinct. |  Agree. It seems like a logical way to do it. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 10th, 2010, 05:32 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jun 2009 
						Posts: 403
					 Thanks: 15 
		
			
				Thanked 28 Times in 21 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Nations under CBM 1.6 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by WraithLord  How fares MA Man in CBM 1.6?- In vanilla it is weak, has that improved? |  In CBM 1.6 they just got Wardens/Warden Lords recruit-everywhere, so they have a really stepped up stealth-raiding force. You still can't trust ever getting a Crone with E2 or W2, but the chances are way better than in vanilla. 
 
It's hard to tell if they're still weak, though. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 11th, 2010, 01:47 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Ellicott City, MD 
						Posts: 401
					 Thanks: 15 
		
			
				Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Nations under CBM 1.6 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by WraithLord  How fares MA Man in CBM 1.6?- In vanilla it is weak, has that improved? |  I would say they are certainly still one of the weaker nations in the game. Certainly recruit-everywhere wardens helps, but it's not quite enough.
				__________________¡Che Cthulhu! ¡Viva la R'lyehlución!
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 11th, 2010, 01:57 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Tacoma WA, USA 
						Posts: 1,314
					 Thanks: 103 
		
			
				Thanked 72 Times in 50 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Nations under CBM 1.6 
 Its debatable that CBM actually weakens Man a little, since it moved Flaming Arrows to ench 5. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 11th, 2010, 03:14 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Tel Aviv, Israel 
						Posts: 3,465
					 Thanks: 511 
		
			
				Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Nations under CBM 1.6 
 That's strange. I fired up a test game with MA Man under CBM 1.6 and didn't see wardens at all. Were they removed from the capital? |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 11th, 2010, 11:21 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: country of stinky fromages 
						Posts: 564
					 Thanks: 29 
		
			
				Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Nations under CBM 1.6 
 You must have had a mod conflict (or anything...) because I could swear (almost    ) I've seen them as recruit anywhere troops. 
 
I'm perfectly sure you can't have a troop recruitable everywhere but not in the capital !
				__________________10 times more numerous, by nigth and backstabbing.
 
 Senior member of the GLIN !
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |