|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
July 2nd, 2018, 05:35 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 365
Thanked 440 Times in 318 Posts
|
|
CIWS/VIRSS Vs ATGM/AGM
A couple of quick questions about the interaction of vehicle missile counter-measures and missiles / LGBs (neither is a huge problem...):
1. Timing/order of resolution - any chance to have the CIWS/smoke animation and the success or fail message play when the missile reaches it's target rather than on launch?
2. If a missile/bomb is successfully countered (especially if destroyed by active systems) should it still explode with it's usual area of effect? (I have had, on a number of occasions, another vehicle or even the original target destroyed by the HE burst!)
|
July 2nd, 2018, 06:24 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,955
Thanks: 464
Thanked 1,896 Times in 1,234 Posts
|
|
Re: CIWS/VIRSS Vs ATGM/AGM
It works as it works.
As to HE effect in the target hex - if VIRSS blinds it, it will still hit somewhere near the tank and go bang on hitting the ground or whatever. (I think VIRSS sometimes reduces hit chance to 1% but its been a decade since I looked at that code, or more).
If a CIWS destroys it it'll also tend to go bang, as the CIWS can be an explosive device as well (in fact I can't think of any vulcan type CIWS, though a rifle calibre one was experimented with for Chieftain in the 70s).
So not a good thing to be infantry near any tank being engaged with ATGM, or that's merrily popping off explosive charges to save itself. That is why tanks with ERA don't carry infantry as well - ERA firing would result in "people pate" for any tank riders.
cheers
Andy
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|
December 15th, 2018, 08:18 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 505
Thanks: 428
Thanked 148 Times in 104 Posts
|
|
Re: CIWS/VIRSS Vs ATGM/AGM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobhack
It works as it works.
As to HE effect in the target hex - if VIRSS blinds it, it will still hit somewhere near the tank and go bang on hitting the ground or whatever. (I think VIRSS sometimes reduces hit chance to 1% but its been a decade since I looked at that code, or more).
cheers
Andy
|
Just had an incident where an HJ-8 attacked a K-2. The message said that the EW defeated the missile, yet the missile struck home anyway and blew up the tank on a front hit (can't recall hull or turret). Is this supposed to happen once in awhile?
|
December 15th, 2018, 09:18 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,489
Thanks: 3,958
Thanked 5,693 Times in 2,812 Posts
|
|
Re: CIWS/VIRSS Vs ATGM/AGM
Yes it will. There are variables built into both the missile and missile defence code that can sometimes result in what was classed as a defeat of the attack turning into something more than that.......in a RL analogy from WW2 you may have shot down the Kamikaze in flames but it still hit the deck of the carrier. Or a board game / miniatures analogy you rolled a 10 for the missile defence then rolled snake-eyes or boxcars for the final result so even though technically you defeated the attack the missile still did damage but in this case enough damage to destroy the target vehicle.
Last edited by DRG; December 15th, 2018 at 10:43 AM..
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
December 15th, 2018, 09:53 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,955
Thanks: 464
Thanked 1,896 Times in 1,234 Posts
|
|
Re: CIWS/VIRSS Vs ATGM/AGM
There still is a 1% or so chance for the missile to hit - nothing is ever a cert.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|
December 15th, 2018, 10:43 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: CIWS/VIRSS Vs ATGM/AGM
You can indeed get a rare hit after it is defeated, as Andy mentioned says 1% chance.
Only difference I can see between the 2 systems is CIWS seems (not tested) to have a slightly better chance of stopping the missile.
Both seem to stop older (less accurate?) systems more frequently than new ones that can get through.
__________________
John
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Imp For This Useful Post:
|
|
December 17th, 2018, 08:08 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hellas->Macedonia->Thessaloniki->City Center->noisy neighbourhood
Posts: 1,359
Thanks: 307
Thanked 128 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Re: CIWS/VIRSS Vs ATGM/AGM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG
Yes it will. There are variables built into both the missile and missile defence code that can sometimes result in what was classed as a defeat of the attack turning into something more than that.......in a RL analogy from WW2 you may have shot down the Kamikaze in flames but it still hit the deck of the carrier. Or a board game / miniatures analogy you rolled a 10 for the missile defence then rolled snake-eyes or boxcars for the final result so even though technically you defeated the attack the missile still did damage but in this case enough damage to destroy the target vehicle.
|
I don't know why but this paragraph just made me feel warm and happy inside.
__________________
That's it, keep dancing on the minefield!
|
December 17th, 2018, 12:08 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,489
Thanks: 3,958
Thanked 5,693 Times in 2,812 Posts
|
|
Re: CIWS/VIRSS Vs ATGM/AGM
In the game, as in real life S**t happens. You could be the best-trained commando/ SF on the planet and a kid with a .22 could get lucky. If it happens too often ...well that's a problem that may need a tweak... but once in a while is perfectly normal game behaviour that has been coded to allow the occasional one in a million "who would have thunk it ?" result. I just related a story from SP1 to Andy in regards to a slight code change that I think I mentioned on the forums in the past but here it is again...
My one outstanding memory of playing a WW2 campaign in SP1 was one I played as the German ..... I had carefully upgraded my force so that by the end of 1944 I had all the "really good stuff" ( well as much of it as you could get in SP1 ).... The first battle of 1945 was January playing against the USA. About 1/4 way into the game.....feeling cocky and doing well....... the AI unleash a hell storm of fighter-bombers..... twin engine B-25's and lots of rocket firing P-47's etc etc.... by the time it was done with me, my carefully husband core was decimated... I was lucky enough to have a save so I played it out again twice more and twice more the flying monkeys from hell eviscerated my panzers..... I have never seen the AI do anything like that again since. It was a truly humbling experience and why I love the game
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
December 17th, 2018, 01:39 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 788
Thanks: 1,257
Thanked 576 Times in 313 Posts
|
|
Re: CIWS/VIRSS Vs ATGM/AGM
Quote:
flying monkeys from hell eviscerated my panzers
|
Vonderbar! Vonderbar!
Oh, that was excellent!
__________________
ASL
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|