.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPMBT
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 13th, 2020, 01:59 PM
Imp's Avatar

Imp Imp is offline
General
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
Imp is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Weapons accuracy

One I get caught on reasonably often is using to few units to herd & shoot up routing units as they are an easy kill. 2 squads & a MG can comfortably keep the suppression on a dozen routed units.
However if one suddenly decides its had enough and rallies things can get interesting, my squads are often close & fast moving to keep up so they might kill one of my men & suddenly there is a domino effect as more go enough & now I am in trouble.
When doing this I have learned do not let a nearby high value unit go bang that seems to restore their fighting spirit.
__________________
John
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old May 14th, 2020, 11:25 AM
zovs66's Avatar

zovs66 zovs66 is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 788
Thanks: 1,257
Thanked 576 Times in 313 Posts
zovs66 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Weapons accuracy

So I am building a 1987 Polish CG. In the first scenario both sides of air power (its a battalion sized CG). A few turns in much to my surprise (as the scenario designer/editor, I gave the AI a flight of WG fighters, but did not plot any moves, I set them to reinforce and gave them a reaction turn and wanted to see how the AI handled them), well they AI handled them pretty well. In fact in both my turn and the AI turn we both had mistaken air attacks.

The good news is that the AI correctly assessed the 'threat' and put his Fighters to good use, well at least one caused some havoc on my closing in Poles. The AI's other fighter bombed and strafed one of his own. I thought so gleefully, until my Polish pilot attacked my Polish FO Vehicle, lol.

Good great fun!

Here is turn screenshots.

This is the area where the AI sent his two fighters. Note that the VH is where one of the AI's fighter strafed and the section where the D0-PL is where the other AI's fighter bombed.


This is where I did not want my Polish fighter to attack (was suppose to go after some Milan puffs of smoke).
__________________
ASL
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old May 14th, 2020, 11:56 AM
Suhiir's Avatar

Suhiir Suhiir is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
Suhiir is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Weapons accuracy

Generally speaking I've found that if there's a friendly unit within about 1000m (20 hexes) of an enemy one the friendly target will get hit about as often as the enemy.

I ASSUME this has to do with visibility. Since an aircraft may not "see" the enemy unit and just attacks the one closest to it's designated target that it can "see".
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie

People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old May 14th, 2020, 12:47 PM
DRG's Avatar

DRG DRG is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,489
Thanks: 3,960
Thanked 5,694 Times in 2,812 Posts
DRG will become famous soon enough
Exclamation Re: Weapons accuracy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suhiir View Post
Generally speaking I've found that if there's a friendly unit within about 1000m (20 hexes) of an enemy one the friendly target will get hit about as often as the enemy.

I ASSUME this has to do with visibility. Since an aircraft may not "see" the enemy unit and just attacks the one closest to it's designated target that it can "see".



Quote:
DANGER CLOSE is included in the method of engagement when the target is (rounds will impact) within 600 meters of friendly troops for mortar and artillery, 750 meters for naval guns 5-inch and smaller, and 1,000 meters for naval guns larger than 5-inch. For naval 16-inch ICM, danger close is 2,000 meters.

I have not ( yet ) found a definition for Danger Close ( air ) but how much ya wanna bet it's 1000m ?


We have had brief discussions in the past regarding penalties for blue on blue but it would be a PITA to code
__________________


"You are never to old to rock and roll if you are too young to die".--- What do you expect to be doing when you are 80?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kWt8ELuDOc

Last edited by DRG; May 14th, 2020 at 12:55 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old May 14th, 2020, 01:13 PM
Mobhack's Avatar

Mobhack Mobhack is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,955
Thanks: 464
Thanked 1,896 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mobhack is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Weapons accuracy

The search radius for planes is 20 hexes - 1000 metres in other words.

Pilots are not that good at Identification Friend or Foe.

(The Operational Research guys found one halftrack positioned on a hill in the post falaise investigation, so it stood out somewhat. It had been strafed from multiple different directions with strikes from rockets, bombs, 20mm, 50 cal etc found all around it. The OR guys determined that one knocked out halftrack had probably been claimed as a "kill" by at least a dozen pilots, if not more)

They do tend to attack an identified enemy if there is an observer with eyes on to an enemy in that zone, but if they have to search for themselves, everything is fair game to the Air Farce...

Hence, not a good idea to have planes overfly your side on the way to the intended target as then it may pick one of your units as its target for tonight.

So planes should only be vectored onto targets well away from friends, unless you have a dedicated observer with eyes on the target at arrival. And they should not overfly friendlies near the target on approach if you can avoid that.

"Close" air support is relative - it means attacks on things at least a click away from friendlies, preferably more.

In Normandy the UK used "pink" strikes as one way to deconflict air from friends - artillery fired red smoke in a belt 2-3 km deep, planes were allowed to kill any vehicle in one direction and not to attempt strikes whatsovever on the friendly side of the pink line...
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
  #16  
Old May 14th, 2020, 03:40 PM
Suhiir's Avatar

Suhiir Suhiir is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
Suhiir is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Weapons accuracy

During Gulf I there were many tanks with multiple hits from coalition air, and undoubtedly reported as a confirmed kill each and every time.

I don't really blame the pilots for this, as Mobhack said, it's hard to be sure of anything from 20,000 ft at 600 MPH.

The USMC relies HEAVILY on air strikes and with an observer the "rule of thumb" is 1 yd per lb. So a 500# bomb within 500yds, a 2000# no closer 2000yds. But unlike the vast majority of pilots those of the USMC do little but ground support. I'm sure USAF A-10 pilots are just as accurate.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie

People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old May 15th, 2020, 06:48 AM
DRG's Avatar

DRG DRG is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,489
Thanks: 3,960
Thanked 5,694 Times in 2,812 Posts
DRG will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Weapons accuracy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suhiir View Post
The USMC relies HEAVILY on air strikes and with an observer the "rule of thumb" is 1 yd per lb. So a 500# bomb within 500yds, a 2000# no closer 2000yds.
1 yd per lb.is a good rule of thumb to remember in situations like that though taken to extremes it does not apply. Standing a yard away from an M67 will not brighten your day in a good way
__________________


"You are never to old to rock and roll if you are too young to die".--- What do you expect to be doing when you are 80?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kWt8ELuDOc
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old May 15th, 2020, 08:31 AM
Imp's Avatar

Imp Imp is offline
General
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
Imp is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Weapons accuracy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suhiir View Post
During Gulf I there were many tanks with multiple hits from coalition air, and undoubtedly reported as a confirmed kill each and every time.

I don't really blame the pilots for this, as Mobhack said, it's hard to be sure of anything from 20,000 ft at 600 MPH.

The USMC relies HEAVILY on air strikes and with an observer the "rule of thumb" is 1 yd per lb. So a 500# bomb within 500yds, a 2000# no closer 2000yds. But unlike the vast majority of pilots those of the USMC do little but ground support. I'm sure USAF A-10 pilots are just as accurate.
The Gulf War actually demonstrated modern guided weapons work brilliantly versus known targets but are not much use if you cannot find your target.
We all saw targeting a window on a building is easy however spotting a dug in camouflaged tank is still very hard hence the one that is poorly concealed gets hit several times.
Translates in game do not move your vehicles if an attack is incoming seek cover the turn before.
__________________
John
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old May 15th, 2020, 01:53 PM
Mobhack's Avatar

Mobhack Mobhack is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,955
Thanks: 464
Thanked 1,896 Times in 1,234 Posts
Mobhack is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Weapons accuracy

Or if you suspect air is coming, run some sacrificial trucks around in high speed circles as bait. Might work, if you are into gamey tactics..
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old May 15th, 2020, 02:10 PM
zovs66's Avatar

zovs66 zovs66 is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 788
Thanks: 1,257
Thanked 576 Times in 313 Posts
zovs66 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Weapons accuracy

In reality (I don't know about crunchies, i.e. grunts or the infantryman), but us tankers hated and feared jets, we could not shoot at them, and if they came over our ao we would go like mad into trees to hide from them (this was versus our own air in exercises in Germany with MILES equipment on).

Once in the desert we were doing maintenance ('cat napping') on our tank and an Warthog buzzed over the top of us (about 10 feet about us) and I think we all had to change our under garments, you can't hear those things until they are right on top of you, thank God they were on our side, I still can hear the Bbbbburrrpp and know that is 1k or so rounds ripping something to shreds.

Once our Earth Pig (FOO in a modified M113) called in a 'Shake and Bake' and they dropped 2k iron bombs on some Iraqi bunkers and followed that up with gas bombs (we could not use napalm).

Choppers you can shoot, with your 50 cal, but when they are hovering over your tank about 15 to 20 feet up your sure glad they are on your side as they are sending out their rockets of death.

Pretty crazy stuff.
__________________
ASL
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zovs66 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.