|
|
|
 |
|

October 22nd, 2002, 09:02 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Honestly winXP is the best OS I have ever used (lots of experience with 95, 98, some with 2000, and some with unix stuff)
The biggest problem that Ive ever had with XP was that SP1 downloaded crappy drivers for my GF4 Ti so I had to go to nvidia to get good ones so I could play NWN and others again. Other than that it is kicking *** for me. Every patch installed, and a good virus scanner on a kick *** machine, I am good to go.
Honestly, XP will crash, but so much less than 98 did for me that I do not care, and I do cause most of the crashes by doing dumb stuff.
But Windows Media player 9 beta sucks ***, it totally got ruined, the new features sound cool but mostly they dont work
__________________
When a cat is dropped, it always lands on its feet, and when toast is dropped, it always lands with the buttered side facing down. I propose to strap buttered toast to the back of a cat. The two will hover, spinning inches above the ground. With a giant buttered cat array, a high-speed monorail could easily link New York with Chicago.
|

October 22nd, 2002, 09:07 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Quote:
Originally posted by Captain Kwok:
Fyron - You can always change the desktop to look like previous windows editions...if that's you're only beef .
|
That isn't my only beef with XP. The fisher price comments refer to more than just the desktop theme. 
|

October 23rd, 2002, 01:15 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
My real beef with MS OS's is that if you want to run your software you have no choice but to get an MS OS. Now if MS had got to this lofty position by producing good quality software that the competition couldn't then fine. But they got there through ruthless (and I believe now proven illegal) practices.
|

October 24th, 2002, 12:30 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Uranus
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
I've been using XP, both Home and Professional editions, for about 6 months now. Previously, I'd used 98SE as well as ME on various office computers and laptops. I have experienced no problems at all with XP. It has worked fine for me and has been completely stable.
|

October 24th, 2002, 02:46 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Going from ME to nearly anything is a huge improvement!
If you haven't used 2000, you won't see the glaring problems with XP qutie as much, cause you won't know what to look for. 
|

October 24th, 2002, 05:27 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
I run 1 box with 98SE, 1 box with XP pro, 5 boxes with 2000 server, and 4 boxes with 2000 pro. They range from 200 MHz up to 2.90GHz, and all of them run 24/7 with no problems. Most lock ups and BSD’s are caused by poorly written software and drivers. Games are also a big problem; again this is do to poorly written code.
__________________
Think about it
|

October 24th, 2002, 06:08 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
"Most lock ups and BSD’s are caused by poorly written software and drivers. Games are also a big problem; again this is do to poorly written code."
I would argue that an OS that must be rebooted after a software crash is itself not written well. Unless the software is something like an installer that needs access to system files.
Now I just have to figure out why my laptop locked up today. With nothing opened but the pre-installed stuff (and not all of it, DIE messanger, DIE).
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

October 24th, 2002, 12:07 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Uranus
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Going from ME to nearly anything is a huge improvement!
|
LOL! No arguement there!
Regarding the XP VS 2000 issue, 2000 is fine if you're happy with it, I was responing more specifically to the "XP sucks" comments.
|

October 24th, 2002, 09:04 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
XP still sucks though. 
|

October 24th, 2002, 09:18 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Biddeford, ME, USA
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Quote:
Originally posted by Thermodyne:
I run 1 box with 98SE, 1 box with XP pro, 5 boxes with 2000 server, and 4 boxes with 2000 pro. They range from 200 MHz up to 2.90GHz, and all of them run 24/7 with no problems. Most lock ups and BSD’s are caused by poorly written software and drivers. Games are also a big problem; again this is do to poorly written code.
|
OT: So thats how you screamed past me....
Back on-topic: I've been using 2000Pro and it has been (as far as MS standards go) bulletproof. My machine I'm typing this on has been running crash-free for over 2 weeks without a reboot or logoff. And no, I don't just type on it - I do some relatively serious ASP / VB development most of the time and write SQL Server front-ends the rest of the time (and of course SE4!!!).
Reguardless of that, a lot of people love to bash MS. Of course, a lot of people love to bash the 'winner' of anything. Look at a car race: they take the winner's car and break it down to every Last bolt to see if they're cheating (noone gives a s#*t if the loser cheats!!). That goes for business, sports, you-name-it...
I'm not at all suggesting that MS is great and puts out the best product it can. ANd lets be real - marketing and 'strongarm' tactics can only take you so far in the real world. The reality is that most people and businesses voted (with their wallet) that Windows was the best OS around. That is NOT my opinion but pure fact....
LET THE FLAMES BEGIN!!!!
$.02>
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|