Is the price of Dominions II a deterrent?

[licker]

Originally posted by PhilD:

quote:

---

Originally posted by licker:


If you are willing to spend more the game is too cheap. That is as absolute a statement as you can get, if you don't like the absoluteness of it, don't blame me, blame the question, which I have twice... oooops now its three times

That is your interpretation of the question. Obviously, it's not the same for everyone here.

If Shrapnel's only intent was to make as much money as they could (not saying it is, but that's sometimes one of the goal of commercial companies), they should set the price at the level that will maximize that. Assuming the manufacturing costs are fixed (and yes, they could make it cheaper by offering a "download only" option, though I can understand if they are wary of the possible piracy consequences), the "best" price level is the one that maximizes "profit per unit" times "number of units sold"; increasing the price tag will mean less copies sold, and increasing it too high will undoubtedly mean less profit.

If the answer to "what should the price be" and "how much would you pay for the game" were supposed to be the same, then the question about "is the price right" would be meaningless - the question about how much you'd pay would be enough.

---

It is my interpretation of the question, as I said elsewhere. However, no where in the questions is there any mention of Shrapnel. And I've said (4 times now) that the only question of importance is the 3rd one, the 1st is misleading at best.

I don't know how to come up with a 'fair' price other than to wind up at a fixed one, there is no 'range' possible for an idividual, either the game is worth x or it isn't. There is no well today is tuesday so the game is worth more to me...

In reality there is because people are fickle, but that's not the *honest* answer, the game has a fixed value at any given point, so either the game is too cheap, or it is too expensive, unless it is just right. You still can't have it both ways!

If they were selling the game for $15 would you say it is too cheap? What about $5? You have a cut off where you will feel that the game is underprices (though you will be happy it is cheap). So if you answer that the game is worth more to you than what it is being sold for (everyone who answered that they'd pay $50+) then the game is underpriced! There is no other way to look at this, that's why I didn't like the wording of the 1st question.

Again, there is no element of how much Shrapnel should charge in this, that is an entirely different question (in my mind). The questions in this poll are about how much you as an idividual are willing to pay for the game, not about how much Shrapnel should charge, becuase none of us have any idea what that number should be.